Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nonsense from the Idiot Department
The Buffalo News ^ | 7/23/2005 | LEONARD PITTS

Posted on 07/23/2005 3:40:37 PM PDT by bayourod

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: TheCrusader
I totally agree with you. It's OK for FASCIST MUSLIM TERRORISTS to threaten. But making our position clear if attacked is a big NoNo.

I'm glad Puny Brained Pitts doesn't negotiate my deals. Idiot that he is.
21 posted on 07/23/2005 4:05:39 PM PDT by Chgogal (Congressmen who willfully...during war...damage moral...should be arrested, exiled or..." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

"A fuel-air bomb just to wipe out the big borg cube. That way we can savour the moment on camera."

I like that. And then we should go back and do it again the next day so they know we meant it.


22 posted on 07/23/2005 4:06:08 PM PDT by D.P.Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bayourod

For the most part, Leonard is a good boy but every now and then he fancies himself somewhat of a pundit and he unleashes his sling in the last-known trajectory of a soft target.

Most times he misses, his bosses move his desk a bit farther from the window and he goes back to his sandbox.

I doubt that Tancredo has ever been concerned with the perpetually disaffected and I doubt that he is any wiser of his own fall from popularity that Mr. Pitts is.


23 posted on 07/23/2005 4:08:13 PM PDT by Old Professer (As darkness is the absence of light, evil is the absence of good; innocence is blind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

"A fuel-air bomb just to wipe out the big borg cube. That way we can savour the moment on camera."

I like that. And then we should go back and do it again the next day just so everybody knows we meant it.


24 posted on 07/23/2005 4:08:33 PM PDT by D.P.Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
Image hosted by TinyPic.com

25 posted on 07/23/2005 4:08:46 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK (secus acutulus exspiro ab Acheron bipes actio absol ab Acheron supplico)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal
"It's funny how responding in kind to FASCIST MUSLIM TERRORISTS (who declared war on the US in the 1998) makes the US the "international pariah"

Responding in kind? Responding in kind to what?

Mecca hasn't bombed us.

If you want to exact revenge on people simply because they are Muslims, why don't you just go to your local convience and blow the head off the clerk.

26 posted on 07/23/2005 4:09:05 PM PDT by bayourod (Cowards taunt terrorists from anonymous keyboards while soldiers in Iraq face the consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Why would Bayou ever come up biased against Tancredo. I mean he stands for all the same things Bayou does right? Oh I forgot. Tancredo does not like unrestricted immigration from Mexico. Therefore Bayou does not like anything about Tancredo. Makes sense to me.


27 posted on 07/23/2005 4:09:14 PM PDT by Sterco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra
Seriously: I get tired of real "lets just nuke'em" posters - who doesn't? But Tancredo was discussing retribution - nuclear weapons are our ultimate (mortal) sanction against the Ummah. We cannot rule out use of Nuclear weapons at the last extremity. Pitts doesn't think self-defence is moral: we do.

I don't agree with pitt's rhetoric or tancredo's.

All tancredo had to say was to say to the question of, God forbid, a nuclear attack on the US by islamofascists is that the reaction would be quick and overwhelming, but no Mr. loudmouth cheap headline grabber tancredo, gives the islamofacists propaganda points.

28 posted on 07/23/2005 4:09:28 PM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
Mecca hasn't bombed us.

Bayourod you just don't get it....

29 posted on 07/23/2005 4:14:42 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bayourod

Old Leonard did have one good column in his career:

http://www.ornery.org/essays/2001-09-12-1.html


30 posted on 07/23/2005 4:18:31 PM PDT by groanup (shred for Ian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bayourod

Host Pat Campbell had asked how we should respond if U.S. cities are ever struck by terrorists using nuclear devices."

Kill them all


Muslims would hate us with renewed fervor

What muslims?

Actually, you don't need to give any thought to the ramifications of such an action, because they should be self-evident to anyone smarter than the average hamster."


Where does this leave LEONARD PITTS and bayourod?


31 posted on 07/23/2005 4:18:33 PM PDT by philetus (What goes around comes around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
Saudi Arabia supports the terrorists through charities and supplies spreads terrorism world wide through the building of Mosques and Muslims schools. My God man, where have you been?

Syria and Iran are in direct conflict with the US. Pakistan is playing both sides and supplied Libya with nuclear know how and is probably helping Iran.

Chicago to me is as much a holy site as is Mecca. If US cities/industrial complexes are hit with nuclear bombs the Saudis, Syrian, Pakistanis and Iranians better be shivering in their boots or sandals. If you want to coddle them than coddle them. I vote for a direct response. Do you have any idea what would happen if major cities and industrial centers were wasted? The world's economy would face a major depression. It would take years to rebuild our city and industrial centers. Would China offer us a Marshall Plan? Would France or Germany? My God, what are you smoking? They have a choice. They can control their fascist tendencies or attack us. If they decide to attack let it be known we will not go down alone.

32 posted on 07/23/2005 4:19:50 PM PDT by Chgogal (Congressmen who willfully...during war...damage moral...should be arrested, exiled or..." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: D.P.Roberts
It's interesting that everyone who says "it's wrong to upset the muslims",

is really thinking,

"please don't upset the muslims, they're crazy, vengeful and murderous, and I don't want them to kill me."

33 posted on 07/23/2005 4:20:53 PM PDT by dagnabbit (Vincente Fox's opening line at the Mexico-USA summit meeting: "Bring out the Gimp!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dane

I think we should walk around the world being very very careful not to piss off any islamic terrorists. sarc


34 posted on 07/23/2005 4:21:34 PM PDT by Sterco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Sterco
being very very careful not to piss off any islamic terrorists. sarc

Or any pro illegal immigration idiots.

35 posted on 07/23/2005 4:24:18 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Sgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
a religion practiced by one of every six people on Earth

One out of six is a pretty dismal performance for a 'religion' which removes your head if you don't join up and removes your head if you quit. My guess is that ninety percent of those whose misfortune it was to be born into Islam would walk away tomorrow if they did not fear for their lives and the lives of their families. Islam is a criminal enterprise tenuously held together by the preponderance of ignorance and the threat of violence.

36 posted on 07/23/2005 4:24:19 PM PDT by layman (Card Carrying Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sterco

Great post and great title for it Bayou.


37 posted on 07/23/2005 4:24:50 PM PDT by Sterco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Yeah..

You might have a Cultural Jihad.

:)


38 posted on 07/23/2005 4:25:44 PM PDT by axes_of_weezles (mainstream extremist (Ha))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
The first time terrorist sets of a nuclear device in the U.S., and there is a very good chance it's going to happen in one of our larger cities, attitudes will change. The first liberal who stands up and says we don't need to over react will probably shot on site. Liberals will be hard to find for a long, long time.
39 posted on 07/23/2005 4:31:59 PM PDT by kempo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bayourod

Capital idea!!!

1. They only understand force and power.
2. Maybe the "90%" of mohammedans who aren't pro-terror will get off their chicken-sh*t a$$e$ and reign in the kooks.


40 posted on 07/23/2005 4:33:37 PM PDT by msf92497 (My brain is "twitchy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson