Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An Image A Little Too Carefully Coordinated (Roberts)
The Washington Post ^ | 7/22/05

Posted on 07/21/2005 11:14:08 PM PDT by kingu

It has been a long time since so much syrupy nostalgia has been in evidence at the White House. But Tuesday night, when President Bush announced his choice for the next associate justice of the Supreme Court, it was hard not to marvel at the 1950s-style tableau vivant that was John Roberts and his family.

There they were -- John, Jane, Josie and Jack -- standing with the president and before the entire country. The nominee was in a sober suit with the expected white shirt and red tie. His wife and children stood before the cameras, groomed and glossy in pastel hues -- like a trio of Easter eggs, a handful of Jelly Bellies, three little Necco wafers. There was tow-headed Jack -- having freed himself from the controlling grip of his mother -- enjoying a moment in the spotlight dressed in a seersucker suit with short pants and saddle shoes. His sister, Josie, was half-hidden behind her mother's skirt. Her blond pageboy glistened. And she was wearing a yellow dress with a crisp white collar, lace-trimmed anklets and black patent-leather Mary Janes.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: confirmations; drivel; eastereggs; jellybeans; johnroberts; neccowafers; roberts; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-222 next last
To: bootless

She's too short-waisted and round-torsoed(not fat,just round) for that tight dropped-waist. But she should know that,she's an almighty "fashion columnist",LOL.


201 posted on 07/22/2005 10:55:39 AM PDT by mrsmel (Here lies David St. Hubbins... and why not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian

The clothing and hair styles say 'conservative'. They probably drive a Ford Explorer and have an investment quality Harley in their two-car garage.


202 posted on 07/22/2005 10:59:04 AM PDT by RightWhale (Substance is essentially the relationship of accidents to itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

Those shoes do NOT go with that dress,and somebody needs some lotion on their heels,LOL. The line of the dress is totally wrong for her,it makes her look dumpy. Line,ladies,line! THIS is the fashion columnist of The WaPo? That's pitiful-it's plain to see where they made some budget cuts.(This is fun,giggle).


203 posted on 07/22/2005 11:01:43 AM PDT by mrsmel (Here lies David St. Hubbins... and why not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: kcvl; jla; All
Hillary Rodham... should [not] be... pitied....

Fortunes are changing in fashion
Web posted December 30, 1998
By Robin Givhan
The Washington Post

Tell it to missus clinton, wudya?
retrograde feminist fraud positions herself as victim (again) in order to win White House
[FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!]


204 posted on 07/22/2005 11:02:29 AM PDT by Mia T (<B>Stop</B> Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel
I think the problem is the fabric of the dress, not so much the line. I'm long-torsoed myself, and I often wear low-waist dresses. But I choose heavier fabrics that hold their line.

If she insists on wearing "fluttery" fabrics, she needs a heavy silk underdress. Only the extremely thin can carry off a busy fitted waist like that in a lightweight fabric.

Meow!

205 posted on 07/22/2005 11:07:52 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (. . . Ministrix of ye Chace (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity

LOL! Well, there is her frumpy slip...wonder what the dress that should go with it looks like? Ha.


206 posted on 07/22/2005 11:12:49 AM PDT by LucyJo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother
I think dropped-waist dresses suit a long torso(like yours),not short torsos(like mine,and hers,to a lesser extent).I totally agree about the fabric-lightweight,but stiff-even worse for that figure(as you say,the lightness is puffy-bad enough-but the stiffness,especially in the pleated skirt,adds to the dumpiness/chunkiness of the line).As a short woman with short torso/long-legged figure, I have to pay a LOT of attention to line and where things are cut off,and things that don't add to the up-and-down visual that I need.

"MEOW" is right,LOL,but hey,she just begs for it:)
207 posted on 07/22/2005 11:14:40 AM PDT by mrsmel (Here lies David St. Hubbins... and why not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel
I wish I had long legs!

(Short legs and a long torso looks SO peculiar on a horse!)

208 posted on 07/22/2005 11:24:15 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (. . . Ministrix of ye Chace (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
"Slick Whiteys Dressed for Easter Sunday Mass"

LOL! (If only the people in my parish dressed that way for Sunday Mass... but I don't want to veer off-topic.)

209 posted on 07/22/2005 11:48:36 AM PDT by ELS (Vivat Benedictus XVI!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Thanks for digging those up. So it WAS her who trashed Katherine Harris. I'd recognize that poison anywhere.


210 posted on 07/22/2005 12:03:24 PM PDT by bootless (Never Forget - And Never Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel

Exactly. It looks like she was stuffed into that dress. Why, oh why, do some of the round fashion criminals not bother to buy something that FITS them? It would look much better. The size tag is never on the outside. If she's wearing a 10, and proud of it, that's too bad, because it looks like a 6. A 12 (or whatever) that fit her would look much better.

And those shoes. And the watch.

Don't DO that!


211 posted on 07/22/2005 12:06:10 PM PDT by bootless (Never Forget - And Never Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother
I wish I had a longer torso,it's so much more elegant for the line of clothes! I can be a lot of things in my style,but "elegant" isn't one of them,sniff sniff. I'm just not built that way-too short and busty(and the sprinkling of freckles across the nose isn't conducive to elegance).

Hmm,now that you mention it,that would be peculiar on a horse!
212 posted on 07/22/2005 12:25:26 PM PDT by mrsmel (Here lies David St. Hubbins... and why not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Eva
This article was nothing compared to the one in the NYT that was written to insinuate that Roberts was possibly gay.

Have a link? I need the laughs.

213 posted on 07/22/2005 1:35:28 PM PDT by Clemenza (JJesus CChrist MMade SSeattle UUnder PProtest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel

Yeah, the classic equitation figure is long legs, short torso. That's why I never rode equitation! Handy hunter, working hunter, conformation hunter, and most recently combined training - where they do NOT judge the rider, just the horse! < g > My horse is extremely pretty and a good mover, so if the judges overlook the rider, all is well.


214 posted on 07/22/2005 1:36:14 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (. . . Ministrix of ye Chace (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

No, I read through links that I was following from Michelle Malkin's site. She didn't link it directly, but one of the other sites did.


215 posted on 07/22/2005 1:40:44 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

Err, I thought you literally meant the the HORSE looks better with the proportions under discussion! LOL!

Then you're an equestrienne(is that the correct term?)? I didn't know that there were so many aspects to it-all those things that you just named.


216 posted on 07/22/2005 2:30:33 PM PDT by mrsmel (Here lies David St. Hubbins... and why not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Wishful image of the Roberts family from the Wash Post's hustling conjurer/fashion critic.


217 posted on 07/22/2005 4:12:41 PM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Clinton as cover girl: Hillary Rodham Clinton's
appearance on the cover of American Vogue forever
shook off her image as an unstylish first lady. More than
that, the cover, coupled with the pictures inside, revealed
a feminine, sexy and sophisticated woman who should be
neither pitied nor feared.

Web posted December 30, 1998
By Robin Givhan
The Washington Post

OK, I'm convinced. This Robin Givhan is certifiably...a kook.

218 posted on 07/22/2005 4:22:09 PM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel
Oh, absolutely, horsey stuff gets as complicated as you like. < g >

The ideal is for the rider to have a long leg lying close to the horse. Us short-legged folk lower our stirrups as much as we dare, but in my case that's not long enough!

The various hunter types I named are the different titles of classes in a horse show, all of which judge "hunters" - that is, a horse that is ridden to hounds. They are ridden in a ring, one at a time, over jumps built for the occasion. "Handy hunter" judges a horse on his ability to negotiate obstacles nimbly - have a lot of tight turns, difficult stride distances, etc. "Working hunter" judges a horse on his suitability for the actual hunting field - steadiness, pace, and smooth jumping. "Conformation hunter" judges the horse primarily on his physically meeting an ideal standard (usually after being ridden over fences, conformation hunters are shown in hand with saddle removed.) Combined training is a different kettle of fish - a horse is tested for his ability in three different disciplines: dressage on the flat, cross country jumping, and jumping in the ring.

Here we are cross country jumping:

You can see that my legs are just too short. But at least I'm still physically active at 50!

219 posted on 07/22/2005 4:22:17 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (. . . Ministrix of ye Chace (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

You don't look 50 from here,or rather your 50 look good from here,and that's a very graceful horse too,the way the front legs kind of curve is lovely.I like horses,but the couple of times I tried to ride,the horse tried to scrape me off on the fence. I guess they can sense that I'm not "the boss" with them,:0 I better stick to swimming,hehe.But it looks like fun!


220 posted on 07/22/2005 4:40:33 PM PDT by mrsmel (Here lies David St. Hubbins... and why not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-222 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson