Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supremely Qualified Judge Roberts Deserves Up/Down Vote in Senate (JudicialWatch endorsement)
JUDICIAL WATCH.ORG ^ | JULY 20, 2005 | TOM FITTON, PRESIDENT, JUDICIAL WATCH

Posted on 07/21/2005 11:08:16 AM PDT by CHARLITE

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton offered the following statement today regarding President Bush’s nomination of Judge John Roberts:

“President Bush promised to nominate someone in the mold of Justices Scalia and Thomas, someone who would refuse to legislate from the bench. With his nomination of John Roberts, the president has apparently kept his promise. By almost all accounts John Roberts is a brilliant, thoughtful conservative justice who will remain faithful to the U.S. Constitution and the rule of law. Moreover, Judge Roberts seems to have the experience and the strength of character to help lead the court away from judicial activism and towards a more conservative, restrained jurisprudence. We look forward to hearing more from him about his judicial philosophy in the weeks ahead. We hope this confirmation process can provide a useful forum for an examination of the role of the courts in our nation’s public life.”

“Democrats have recklessly promised to ‘go to war’ against President Bush’s nominee, but they will have a difficult time against someone as qualified as Judge Roberts. A filibuster of his nomination would do the U.S. Constitution grave harm. He deserves an up-or-down vote, and each United States Senator should now make a commitment to that core principle.”

Judicial Watch a non-partisan, educational foundation organized under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue code. Judicial Watch is dedicated to fighting government and judicial corruption and promoting a return to ethics and morality in our nation's public life.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; bush; endorsement; johngroberts; johnroberts; judicialwatch; nominee; scotus; tomfitton; updownvote

1 posted on 07/21/2005 11:08:21 AM PDT by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

BTTT!


2 posted on 07/21/2005 11:11:06 AM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Judicial Watch has endorsed Roberts. I believe his chance of confirmation has now been cut in half.


3 posted on 07/21/2005 11:18:29 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord

They just endorsed him, so that they could sue him later.


4 posted on 07/21/2005 11:28:24 AM PDT by horse_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
Pardon me if I'm not impressed. JW has been a hugh disappointment.
5 posted on 07/21/2005 11:57:22 AM PDT by upchuck ("If our nation be destroyed, it would be from the judiciary." ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson