My Rage Over the Nick Berg Killing - (important never to forget Nick Berg...May, 2004 article!)

CHRONWATCH.COM ^ | MAY 13, 2004 | BARBARA J. STOCK

[CHARLITE]

Last week I was outraged at the behavior of a handful of reservists and disgusted by the pictures that have been plastered all over every media source around the world. I am no longer outraged. Arrest those guilty, give them a fair trial, and put those found guilty in jail--end of story. No more apologies; no more hearings; no more embarrassment over what happened.

The hideous butcher of an American citizen by faceless terrorists and the video put out by creatures I used to refer to as ''animals'' has changed all that. As they held up this young man's severed head for the camera, I decided I will no longer call these sub-animals anything but ''things.'' Calling them animals and putting them in the same class with pigs, is an insult to pigs so I hereby issue a formal apology to all the pigs of the world. The swine of the world are far more ''human'' than these ''things'' that can cut an innocent man’s head off in a most gruesome fashion. They can’t even kill a helpless man--with his hands tied behind his back--with four ''things'' holding him down--in an efficient manner.

No, they hacked at his throat as he screamed in agony for 30 seconds before his misery was finally ended. What brave ''things'' these butchers are to kidnap a man who was there helping to rebuild Iraq. He was not a soldier. Nick Berg didn’t shoot anyone. He didn’t humiliate anyone and take pictures of the event. No, he just went there to work. As they ended this young man’s life, they were shouting, ''God is great!'' May Allah design a special place in hell for these ''things.''

These ''things'' are afraid of real soldiers. They can only butcher men with their hands bound. They can only blow up children and execute babies and pregnant women. They are cowards.

''Things'' hide in holy places and defile them with their evil. A ''thing'' bravely covers his head so no one can see his evil face as he murders. This ''thing'' doesn’t want anyone to know how much he enjoys what he is doing. That’s why he does it. He likes doing it. He doesn’t care about the Iraqi people--he never has and he never will. He just enjoys killing. He is a soulless creature who exists on a different plane from humans. If there are such things as demons, these ''things'' are they.

The ''things'' say it is punishment for what happened in the Abu Ghraib prison to Iraqi prisoners. What is the excuse for the butcher of Danny Pearl? What was his crime? For what was he punished? There were no humiliating pictures being flashed around the world when Danny had his throat slit by some Islamic guardian of the gates of hell.

The American outrage over the treatment of the Iraqi prisoners was immediate and loud. Where is the Muslim outrage as these ''things'' butcher in the name of their God? Where is the anger over the image that has become the face of Islam? Islam has become a faith of death, hate, and murder in the eyes of the civilized world.

When the war on terror began on September 11, 2001, I didn’t blame Muslims for the carnage. Last week I didn’t blame Muslims as a whole for the butchery seen now around the world. My opinion is changing, however.

Three thousand people were murdered on 9/11. Several hundred were murdered in Spain. Last week a woman who was eight months pregnant and her children--including a two year old--were gunned down in Israel. Two ''things'' dressed as women tried to wreak havoc at a memorial for this woman just a few days ago. Israeli soldiers sent them to their fate. Their fate is to stand before Allah and try to explain the killing of babies in his name.

Islam has brought death and destruction to every continent on the face of this planet. Where does it end? When does it become so much mindless killing that Islam will rise up and destroy the evil within? A terrorist is a terrorist whether in Iraq, here in America, Spain, or Israel. All are killing in the name of your God--killing in the name of Allah--but when will Muslims become outraged? Will Muslims ever become outraged? Does Islam quietly rejoice at the actions of the ''things''? Muslim silence is speaking volumes. Either Islam approves of the killing or it is afraid of the ''things'' that have stolen the Islamic faith and refuses to stand up to them. If Muslims do not reclaim their religion, it will be forever lost, strangled to death by the blood of innocent people.

If the Muslims of the world do not step forward and demand that the killing ends, the bloodbath will go on and on. As Muslims allow their sons and daughters to be indoctrinated into a climate of hate, where the throat-slitting of innocents and the killing of babies is cheered as a great victory for Allah, the hate will grow, but not as Muslims expect. The hate will come from our side.

Americans will no longer care if we blow up a mosque. If the ''things'' are hiding there, blow it up. If terrorists hide in Islam’s holy shrines, they are no longer holy but black holes that lead straight to hell. Any Muslim that houses them as guests becomes the enemy and will die as a terrorist and Allah will judge silent Muslims as harshly he judges the terrorists. If mainstream Islam does not speak out against terrorist acts and take steps to condemn such acts and stop the killing, the blood of thousands will be on their hands as much as it is on the terrorists’ hands. The dead are crying out for justice. The only justice for these ''things'' is death. I doubt that Allah will have any mercy on their souls.

As to Americans, we have been reminded of what the enemy really is--a ''thing.'' Terrorists are faceless, soulless creatures that must be exterminated from the face of earth. ''Things'' and all who harbor them must cease to exist. If terrorism is not stopped, it will corrupt all and evil will win. Satan is joyous this day--his minions have made him very proud.

About the Writer: Barbara is a registered nurse who enjoys writing about politics and current events. Her website is at http://www.republicanandproud.com and she receives e-mail at:
dickens502003@yahoo.com.

[CHARLITE]

When this Barbara J. Stock article was posted on CHRONWATCH.COM on May 13, 2004, it went on to receive 19,957 Google hits.

[aynrandfreak]

My rage over Nick Berg's father's reaction.

[CHARLITE]

Another big SLERT ALERT!

Char (:

[Jazzman1]

yes but the LIBERALS still think these savages are the victims...

[SmithL]

When the war on terror began on September 11, 2001,

No, the war actually began in February 1993, when terrorist bombed the World Trade Center, but we didn't become combatants until after September 1001.

[backhoe]

The Berg Beheading- some links
various FR links | 05-12-04 | The Heavy Equipment Guy
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1133927/posts

[CHARLITE]

"No, the war actually began in February 1993, when terrorist bombed the World Trade Center, but we didn't become combatants until after September 1001."

You're absolutely right. In fact, it really goes back to the day in 1979 when President Jimmy Carter sat back and allowed that foul smelling old "f$#t" to fly from Paris to Tehran, overthrow the Shah of Iran and begin what has been a 26 year reign of terror, heavily funded by Iran, Saudi Arabia and Syria (not to mention Libya until Khaddfi saw the light).

Thanks for your clarification. Consider that we may not have had to suffer a 9/11 attack, had Billary Klintoon been taking care of this country's interests, rather than fiddling with cigars in the Oval Office.

Char

[CHARLITE]

Thanks, backhoe. I just heard Bo Dietl on CAVUTO (FNC) at the top of this hour. He said some interesting things. First, that our soldiers have reported having found syringes and crystal methamphetamines all over "safe houses" which had been used by the "insurgents" and foreign fighters in Fallujah.

Bo then suggested that we start doing what General Pershing recommended for battling Muslim extremists: let them know that every one of our bullets has been dipped in pigs' blood before loading into our boys' weapons.

Believe it or not, these fanatics believe these things. If they are killed by a bullet befouled with pigs' blood, they are denied entry into Allah's harem with the 72 virgins. They can't get to Islam's promised land!

Sounds so primitive to us, but that is exactly what we are fighting here...............a barbaric, primitive lunatic cult from the Dark Ages.........and many of them are jazzed up on methamphetamines!

Dip bullets in pigs' blood! . . . and let them know it. Make videos, showing the process!

Thanks for the Berg links, backhoe.

Char

[backhoe]

Thanks for the Berg links, backhoe.

You bet, and I agree with you.

Unless and until we hammer these characters so hard that they whimper in their sleep when they dream of us, we are going to see such barbarity at home. Schools, day-care centers, malls, and so on.

We will almost certainly see some of it anyway, so be prepared, and stay strong.

There will be no second-place winner.

[redhead]

"Dip bullets in pigs' blood! . . . and let them know it. Make videos, showing the process! Thanks for the Berg links, backhoe. Char"

We wouldn't even need to really dip them, just SAY we had. Unless we have a problem with lying to the b*stards, of course...

[mosquewatch.com]

"No, the war actually began in February 1993, when terrorist bombed the World Trade Center, but we didn't become combatants until after September 1001."

This war started 1400 years ago when a mad man named Mohammed was born. They (Muslims) have been at war with everyone else and themselves. Our war against the islamic idealogy started on 9-11, their war has been advancing to the West for years.IMHO.

Jeff

[CHARLITE]

"We wouldn't even need to really dip them, just SAY we had. Unless we have a problem with lying to the b*stards, of course..."

They are the ones who are enamored and fascinated with videos, so we should make thousands of videos and air drop them throughout known jihadist population centers. These would show our military being outfitted with pigs' blood-dipped bullets as "standard issue."

Then, wait and see how they react. Of course, the disturbing facts reported by Bo Dietl about these "fighters" being high on crystal meth would change the equation, since it removes any and all reasoning processes entirely. . . . not that the ones they rely upon without drugs aren't just as bizarre, unrealistic and deadly.

Thanks for your comments, redhead!

Char (:

[Mia T]

The time has come to address the real root cause of suicide bombing: incitement by certain religious and political leaders.

In Love With Death
(Dershowitz Explicitly Nails Islamofascism As "A Culture of Death")
The Guardian (UK)| 6/4/04 | Alan Dershowitz

The dernier cri of seditious and corrupt Leftists everywhere, pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic renders the Left, irrespective of policy, no less dangerous to Western civilization than the terrorists they aid and abet.

pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic
WHY THE LEFT IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA
Mia T, 5.15.04

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

 

pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic
WHY THE LEFT IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA

by Mia T, 5.15.04

As long as you've got a rich man on your arm, you don't need a big bag.

--Elizabeth Rickard

 

The $100 billion Iraqi Oil for Food program was by far the largest relief operation in the history of the United Nations. By extension, it's rapidly becoming the U.N.'s largest-ever scandal....

Those included rewarding friends and allies world-wide with oil allocations on very favorable terms, as well as extracting large kickbacks from oil traders and suppliers of humanitarian goods....

There can be little doubt that U.N. mismanagement contributed greatly to the negative perception of the anti-Saddam containment policy. There is also little doubt that the reward and kickback scheme--as well the possibility of exposure--was a factor as some countries weighed whether to back U.S.-led regime change in Iraq. There is even reason to suspect that some of the Saddam friends and allies who benefited may have been members of the U.N. Secretariat.

Oil for Scandal
The Wall Street Journal Editorial Page
Thursday, March 18, 2004 12:01 a.m.

 

eave it to the French to make pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic all the rage.

They and their moneygrubbing, Oil-for-Food defrauding cohorts abroad, and their power-hungry would-be terrorist sympathizers here, are all sporting "THE LOOK."

(How many of those oh so trendy Kerry-clinton-Kennedy hate-America, blame-America-first sound bites will Al-Jazeera broadcast today?)

The trusty triad's half-truths, exaggerations and outright lies, confounded by fog of war, vagaries of peace and uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds, remind us that things are not always what they first seem. The UN Oil-for-Food scandal, for example, has shown us it was not "going to war with Iraq" that was "all about oil," but rather, "not going to war with Iraq." The Left, we now see, had that one, (as they have most things), exactly backward.

The dernier cri of seditious and corrupt Leftists everywhere, pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic renders the Left, irrespective of policy, no less dangerous to Western civilization than the terrorists they aid and abet.

ALSO:
As long as you've got a Rich man on your arm, you don't need a big bag
MARC RICH BECOMES OIL-FOR-FOOD MIDDLEMAN JUST ONE MONTH AFTER CLINTON PARDON

[jjmcgo]

There were too many weird aspects of Berg's life before he died for me to believe the story as presented. Spy? Islamic sympathizer? Four different colleges, contacts with Bin Laden supporters in the U.S.?
Just an all-around weird story.