Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

KRISTOL: Bush Rises to the Occasion The Roberts pick is courageous and important.
The Weekly Standard ^ | 07/19/2005 | Bill Kristole

Posted on 07/19/2005 8:20:10 PM PDT by tellw

WITH THE SUPREME COURT PICK of John Roberts, George W. Bush rose to the occasion.

The occasion was an opportunity to reshape the Supreme Court. Bush seized the opportunity, in two ways: He moved the Court a solid step to the right (to speak vulgarly), and he elevated its quality. It's true that Roberts is a Rehnquist, not a Scalia or a Thomas. He'll be a little more incremental, a little more cautious, than some of us rabid constitutionalists will sometimes like. But he is a conservative pick, and a quality pick--and, to my surprise, a non-PC, non-quota pick.

I had expected Bush to choose a woman. Indeed, I pointed in last week's editorial to several competent and qualified conservative woman. But in preemptively yielding to gender quotas, so to speak, I made a mistake--and earned a well-deserved and well-argued rebuke from Charmaine Yoest at National Review Online, who said I (and others) had "conceded too easily" to the pernicious claims of identity politics. She was right. And the president, weighing a truly important decision for the country's future, agreed with her. By simply going for the best person, by not worrying about walking out to the podium last night accompanied by a white male, Bush did something important and courageous. He showed that he knows that on really significant matters, one has to ignore political correctness and political pandering, and even political convenience. For this lesson, as well as for an intellectually impressive and politically sound choice, Bush deserves a lot of credit. I unreservedly give it to him.

William Kristol is editor of The Weekly Standard.


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: bush43; johnroberts; kristol; roberts; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

1 posted on 07/19/2005 8:20:11 PM PDT by tellw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tellw

This is a preview of a longer editorial Kristol is writing.


2 posted on 07/19/2005 8:20:44 PM PDT by tellw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tellw
to my surprise, a non-PC, non-quota pick.

That, too, was my very first reaction. A white man? Who'da thunk it?! Not me.

3 posted on 07/19/2005 8:22:39 PM PDT by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tellw

Hmmmm. If Kristol is happy, I'm a little worried. Maybe this is one of those rare times when he might actually see beyond his own ego and be satisfied with a decision that he didn't have a direct influence on.


4 posted on 07/19/2005 8:26:49 PM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

I went to the du to see what the crazies were saying and man are they going nutzo. Every foul word known to man is posted and re-posted, which is what they do when they are upset. I don't know too much about Roberts, but it is making the nuts over at du even nuttier {if possible} and that works for me.


5 posted on 07/19/2005 8:27:36 PM PDT by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

Bush picked great people for his administration. No surprise he'd do the same for the SCOTUS.


6 posted on 07/19/2005 8:28:28 PM PDT by tellw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tellw
Dubya tricked all of us! :D
He really is a good poker player!
Thank you President Bush!
7 posted on 07/19/2005 8:29:15 PM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rokke
Hmmmm. If Kristol is happy, I'm a little worried.

Me too. Actually I am more than a little worried.

8 posted on 07/19/2005 8:31:00 PM PDT by A. Pole (For today's Democrats abortion and "gay marriage" are more important that the whole New Deal legacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tellw
Roberts is a hit into the gap in right/center field- whether it ends up being a double, triple or a long single waits to seen.

Luttig and Brown would have been home runs off the right side edge of the right field foul pole. Brown would have eviscerated the Dems politically.

Dubya compromised with the Dems. He wouldn't swing for the fences, in exchange the Dems accepted the "gapper" into right center. How far Roberts goes round the bases will be the ultimate factor in determining who got the best of the trade.


TAGLINES

Pzifer: “Viagra won’t cause dementia or blindness". (Except if one wears a Black Robe)

Clean your muskets and sharpen your pitchforks and get ready to ride to the sound of the guns.(KELO) :o}-

Dems, hello??? We could get out of Vietnam; we can’t GET OUT of terrorism.

9 posted on 07/19/2005 8:32:08 PM PDT by sirthomasthemore (I go to my execution as the King's humble servant, but God's first!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rokke
"Maybe this is one of those rare times when he might actually see beyond his own ego and be satisfied with a decision that he didn't have a direct influence on."

Kristol seems to follow McCain's lead, and McCain and most of Washington is estatic at GWB's nomination of Judge Roberts...which is to say, most of Washington is trying to warn the Dems to not get slaughtered in this fight. Roberts is untouchable.

Moreover, most of Washington knows that President Bush picked this fight deliberately; the Prime Time announcement of a young White male gives that fact away. The radicals may still take the bait, of course, which would give us an end to the filibuster...because Judge Roberts *will* be confirmed.

10 posted on 07/19/2005 8:35:22 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tellw
"This is a preview of a longer editorial Kristol is writing."

Who cares. Kristol was wrong about who the President would as Homeland Security Chief, and he was wrong again.

Kristol is a has-been.

11 posted on 07/19/2005 8:35:34 PM PDT by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tellw
Having followed Bush's career from the start, he's always done what he thought was right regardless of what the conventional wisdom expected him to do.

I don't know him well enough personally to know whether he delights in confounding the press. My hunch is that he doesn't. I think he just doesn't care what they think at all.

12 posted on 07/19/2005 8:36:19 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Good post, Southack.

I think Roberts has two attributes in particular that make him an intriguing selection: 1) he's got an exceptional legal background but hasn't been a judge for very long; and 2) he's earned a reputation for his legal career arguing cases successfully before the U.S. Supreme Court.

13 posted on 07/19/2005 8:38:49 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

You're worried about everything Bush does. We know.


14 posted on 07/19/2005 8:39:05 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska
Every foul word known to man is posted and re-posted, which is what they do when they are upset.

They love to talk dirty, don't they? I guess they've never gotten over the stage where publicly using bad language was seen as a sign of liberation.

15 posted on 07/19/2005 8:39:14 PM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sirthomasthemore

"Roberts is a hit into the gap in right/center field- whether it ends up being a double, triple or a long single waits to seen."

Sure.... but whats important here is if Roberts stays true to his conservative convictions and originalist interpretations. There is no reason to doubt that at this point. So whether a base hit or a home run brings in the win is less important. JUST RESULTS in the end.


16 posted on 07/19/2005 8:45:49 PM PDT by tflabo (Take authority that's ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
he's earned a reputation for his legal career arguing cases successfully before the U.S. Supreme Court.

That's a good point. I think I read on another thread he has about a 70% win rate before the court.

17 posted on 07/19/2005 8:47:44 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tellw

This is one of Pres. Bush's finer moments, and I believe this decision will leave a good legacy for the nation.


18 posted on 07/19/2005 8:48:59 PM PDT by tomahawk (Proud to be an enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

Heheheh. They were so busy guarding the windows and the back door, they left the front door wide open.


19 posted on 07/19/2005 8:49:14 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tellw

Military record? Dirty Dan needs to know.


20 posted on 07/19/2005 8:49:57 PM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson