Skip to comments.
Reactions to the Supreme Court Nomination of John G. Roberts
The Associated Press ^
| July 19, 2005
| The Associated Press
Posted on 07/19/2005 7:04:12 PM PDT by LucyJo
Reactions to the Supreme Court Nomination of John G. Roberts The Associated Press Published: Jul 19, 2005
Reactions to President Bush's nomination of John G. Roberts to the Supreme Court:
"The president has chosen someone with suitable legal credentials, but that is not the end of our inquiry. The Senate must review Judge Roberts' record to determine if he has a demonstrated commitment to the core American values of freedom, equality and fairness." - Senate minority leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.
"Judge Roberts is the kind of outstanding nominee that will make America proud. He embodies the qualities America expects in a justice on its highest court: someone who is fair, intelligent, impartial and committed to faithfully interpreting the Constitution and the law." - Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn.
http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGBIV8JVCBE.html
(Excerpt) Read more at ap.tbo.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: johnroberts; reaction; roberts; scnomination; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-114 next last
1
posted on
07/19/2005 7:04:18 PM PDT
by
LucyJo
To: LucyJo
2
posted on
07/19/2005 7:06:10 PM PDT
by
RockinRight
(Democrats - Trying to make an a$$ out of America since 1933)
To: LucyJo
Here is DU's Reaction..
AHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
3
posted on
07/19/2005 7:06:14 PM PDT
by
cmsgop
( Bong Hits, Fraggle Rock Reruns and DU is no way to go through Life....)
To: LucyJo
What are the SC justices saying?
4
posted on
07/19/2005 7:08:14 PM PDT
by
WinOne4TheGipper
(It's going to be a hoot to see the Swimmer judge ANYONE'S character.)
To: LucyJo
My hope is the Repubs stick with this guy. It seems he is what is needed on the court.
Now prepare for the Spanish Inquisition.
5
posted on
07/19/2005 7:08:48 PM PDT
by
Burf
To: LucyJo
Let me add to the list Paula Zahn (CNN) - She looked like she was going to cry tonight. She said the Administration had $18MM to spend on the process. Yes, the Administration.
To: LucyJo
Dollars to donuts they had this quote in the can no matter who Bush chose ...
"We are extremely disappointed that President Bush has chosen such a divisive nominee for the highest court in the nation, rather than a consensus nominee who would protect individual liberty and uphold Roe v. Wade." - NARAL Pro-Choice America.
... another group who opposes a nominee because they are not liberal judicial activists.
7
posted on
07/19/2005 7:09:42 PM PDT
by
WOSG
To: LucyJo
On FNC, Bill Kristol speculated that Roberts is really the one who will eventually replace Rehnquist as CJ and Bush will appoint a REAL conservative to the vacancy created when Roberts moves to CJ.
That is a very exciting prospect and would really cement the conservative leaning of the SCOTUS.
8
posted on
07/19/2005 7:10:33 PM PDT
by
randita
To: cmsgop
No, here is DU's reaction...
That mean (f word) Chimpy McBushitler* invaded the (d word) SCOTUS just because of oil.
9
posted on
07/19/2005 7:11:35 PM PDT
by
WinOne4TheGipper
(It's going to be a hoot to see the Swimmer judge ANYONE'S character.)
To: LucyJo
"Oh joy, oh rapture, oh bliss." to paraphrase Gilbert and Sullivan.
10
posted on
07/19/2005 7:12:00 PM PDT
by
jimfree
(Freep and ye shall find.)
To: LucyJo
NOW is having palpitations.
http://now.org/
It's too bad that since they failed to turn the presidential election, and blew their wad in a spectacular failure trying to turn the the California governor's election, everyone now knows they have no political power.
11
posted on
07/19/2005 7:14:43 PM PDT
by
Fido969
("The story is true" - Dan Rather)
To: jimfree
We are so screwed. This guy is no Scalia. Watch the reaction from the Dems. Some liberals will make a big stick to provide political cover, but this is Souter II, and the Dem reactions will be the proof.
To: LucyJo
This is one time where I agree that this is Bush's fault.
13
posted on
07/19/2005 7:16:07 PM PDT
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: WOSG
"We are extremely disappointed that President Bush has chosen such a divisive nominee for the highest court in the nation, rather than a consensus nominee who would protect individual liberty and uphold Roe v. Wade." - NARAL Pro-Choice America. Tough cookies. A host of NARAL's graying harridans will have passed to their eternal reward when Justice Roberts is stripping the bogus penumbras and emanations from the Constitution.
14
posted on
07/19/2005 7:16:50 PM PDT
by
rhema
To: cmsgop
Here is DU's Reaction.. AHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
More like...
AHHHHHHHHHH....THUDDDDDDDDDDD!!!!!
15
posted on
07/19/2005 7:17:14 PM PDT
by
KStorm
(The Original "I Didn't Do It" Boy since 1967!)
To: LucyJo
<< "Who knows about this guy?" - Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa. >>
LOL
16
posted on
07/19/2005 7:17:15 PM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: LucyJo
Fair, fair, fairness, fairy.
What do Blue Senators from Red States have to say?
I'm thinking they approve - or they'll be "retired" from their no-job gravy train.
Senator must be peeing in his white sheets.
17
posted on
07/19/2005 7:17:32 PM PDT
by
mabelkitty
(Lurk forever, but once you post, your newbness shines like a new pair of shoes.)
To: LucyJo
The only issue here is whether we are going to let liberal pressure groups choose our Supreme Court Justices.
To: bahhumbug
Kinda like how Schumer planned in his cell phone call? Schumer went on to say how hard it was to predict how a Supreme Court justice would turn out: Even William Rehnquist is more moderate than they expected. The only ones that resulted how they predicted were [Antonin] Scalia and [Ruth Bader] Ginsburg. So most of the time they've gotten their picks wrong, and that's what we want to do to them again. Yeah, right.
19
posted on
07/19/2005 7:18:30 PM PDT
by
mabelkitty
(Lurk forever, but once you post, your newbness shines like a new pair of shoes.)
To: LucyJo
Lack of hysteria on the left makes me a bit worried.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-114 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson