LIVE THREAD 2 : SCOTUS Announcement at 9 PM (EDT)

Thread One ^ | July 19, 2005 | Me

[Mo1]

New thread time

Thread One

[OXENinFLA]

PAT AND CHUCIKE SITLL LIVE ON C-SPAN2....

[Redleg Duke]

LOSER!

[TeleStraightShooter]

I must hand it to Chuckie in his moment of candor: "Roberts will be in position to write law."

Chuckie just admitted the SCOTUS is acting extra-constituionaly.

[BibChr]

I understand.

I, on the other hand, looking down the barrel of the big 5-0 this September, am DIGGING on how everyone's saying what a YOUNG man he is! Yeah, baby, yeah!

Dan
(c8

[silent_jonny]

As stupid as it may sound, he seemed humble and has a kind face

That's not stupid at all. It's exactly what I thought, too. Such a contrast to the nasty, snarling dems.

I say:

BRING IT ON!!!

[JediForce]

This must be an excellent pick if turbin Durbin hates him.

[hole_n_one]

Prsident s/b President

[RobFromGa]

I dread we have been 'Bushed' again.

You are wrong.

[ohioWfan]

I can 'move on' because the President showed the imagination to appoint a young, white, conservative man when everyone was expecting a moderate woman.

You said you'd like to be wrong about who he'd pick. You WERE wrong.

But I guess grown men who call themselves 'dude' have problems with admitting those kinds of things.

Moving on now, dude...........surf's up. :)

[RightWhale]

one of the brightest conservative minds

Not just one of the brightest legal minds?

[Howlin]

"Bush has guaranteed a 'more controversial' confirmation process".

Let's see what our side of the Gang has to say about that.

[Michael Barnes]

What tickles me; the dem's now furiously releasing "statements" had them drawn up for a while..They all had in them "Insert name here"..

Doesn't matter who was nominated; vilify, destroy, and lie.

Oh the coming days are gonna be fun.

[Protect the Bill of Rights]

If I wasn't so lazy I would start a thread--
"Dem's word for the day."
Today is a tough one for the dems...2 words actually
"Free Pass"

[kcvl]

And CHuckie want to know "PERSONAL VIEWS".............

Which Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg REFUSED TO ANSWER (as she should)!!!

"Ginsburg Rule".

They're screwed again! lol!

[BlessedByLiberty]

Tee-hee - FOX leaves Chuckie blabbering on. Like how Brit Hume used the phrase "Schumer's list."

Okay: already against Judge Roberts are Kennedy, Schumer, Durbin. Proving once again that you can judge the honor of a man by his enemies. Judge Roberts must be near a saint!

[djf]

I keep hearing about an energy crisis, Doesn't old Chuckee blow enough hot air to solve about half of it?

[JFC]

Dims have gone to the dark side

[b4its2late]

Extraordinary circumstances no doubt.

[Republican Wildcat]

Yes - and they did not demand Roberts' papers when he was confirmed to the same court that Estrada was nominated for. Their motivations in that case against Estrada were obviously racist because of that - as McConnell and Hatch point out at the time during floor debate on Estrada's nomination.

However, now that you mention it, they will use that old card since he is now nominated to the SCOTUS.

[FaithintheRight]

Reproductive Rights. s a Deputy Solicitor General, Mr. Roberts co-wrote a Supreme Court brief in Rust v. Sullivan,1 for the first Bush administration, which argued that the government could prohibit doctors in federally-funded family planning programs from discussing abortions with their patients. The brief not only argued that the regulations were constitutional, notwithstanding the Supreme Court's decision in Roe v. Wade, but it also made the broader argument that Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided - an argument unnecessary to defend the regulation. The Supreme Court sided with the government on the narrower grounds that the regulation was constitutional.