Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Source: Clement Not Bush's Choice for High Court
ABC News ^ | July 19, 2005 | n/a

Posted on 07/19/2005 3:03:17 PM PDT by Checkers

Source: Clement Not Bush's Choice for High Court Source Tells ABC News Much-Discussed Potential Candidate Isn't the White House's Choice for Supreme Court Jul. 19, 2005 - Judge Edith Clement -- perceived by many observers as a potential frontrunner for the Supreme Court seat vacated by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor -- is not President Bush's choice for the high court.

An informed source told ABC News they had spoken with Clement and said she received a phone call from the White House this afternoon. According to the source, Clement was thanked for meeting with the president and sharing her views on the Supreme Court, but that the administration has decided to go in a "different direction."

The White House said Bush will announce his selection tonight at 9 p.m. ET.

A U.S. Court of Appeals judge for the 5th Circuit, Clement was nominated to her current position by Bush and was confirmed by the Senate in November 2001.

Speculation has swirled about the nomination since O'Connor announced her retirement on July 1.

O'Connor, 75, was the first female justice to serve on the High Court, and many speculated that Bush would choose a woman to replace her.

Clement was considered a leading candidate to replace her, along with her colleague on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit in New Orleans, Edith Hollan Jones.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS: baitswitch; edithclement; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: Heartofsong83

"That is who I am thinking too...I keep getting the two Ediths mixed up...Clement is the more libertarian one and Jones is the more social-conservative one?"


If they get on the Court, ask me in a couple of years!

lol


41 posted on 07/19/2005 3:36:14 PM PDT by Checkers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: montag813
A Janice Rogers-Brown nomination would electrify the nation, inspire women and minorities, and humiliate Democrats if they try to fillibuster a nominee they had formerly declared as fillibuster-proof.

You may be right, but I can just see the Democrats and their "moderate" lapdogs telling us that "She has not had enough years on the appeals court."

Because they delayed her confirmation for two or three years.

42 posted on 07/19/2005 3:37:09 PM PDT by Montfort (Many liberals hate Bush more than they love life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Heartofsong83

"Of course, the hard liberals like Boxer and Kennedy would likely still attempt a filibuster even if it is a suicidal one (if they aren't even close to the required votes)..."

La-oo-oo-oo-oosss-ssss-ssers!


43 posted on 07/19/2005 3:37:48 PM PDT by Checkers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

"Call forwarding?"


44 posted on 07/19/2005 3:41:20 PM PDT by MizSterious (Now, if only we could convince them all to put on their bomb-vests and meet in Mecca...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

"cell phone"


45 posted on 07/19/2005 3:42:26 PM PDT by Checkers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Checkers

Anyone here following tradesports? I shorted Edith Jones at 54 and she's down to 36. I bought Miguel Estrada at 0.50. If he gets picked my $2.00 becomes $400!


46 posted on 07/19/2005 3:45:29 PM PDT by aynrandfreak (When can we stop pretending that the Left doesn't by and large hate America?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Checkers
Luttig and Roberts fit the bill.

They definatly do, I prefer Luttig, in that he is 50 years old I think and in good health, and a solid conservative, I'm not as sure about Roberts yet.

47 posted on 07/19/2005 3:58:04 PM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M

Luttig is 51; Roberts is 49.


48 posted on 07/19/2005 4:02:02 PM PDT by Checkers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: tflabo
OK Dubya.....pick a STRONG CONSERVATIVE.... ex-Judge Roy Moore gets my vote. That would be a fireworks explosion with the leftists however. Screw em... they foisted Ginsburg on us and she is RADICAL left as we know. So Nuke the libs on this one.

Edith Clement has written on the subject of abortion rights that Roe is settled law. If that's what her current views are now, there will be hell to pay if Bush nominates her..

Sadly, Ginsberg was "foisted" on us by one of our own conservatives, Orrin Hatch (friend of mine sent me this):

http://thinkprogress.org/2005/07/01/how-clinton-treated-hatch/

49 posted on 07/19/2005 4:19:56 PM PDT by podkane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson