Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Source: Clement Not Bush's Choice for High Court
ABC News ^ | July 19, 2005 | n/a

Posted on 07/19/2005 3:03:17 PM PDT by Checkers

Source: Clement Not Bush's Choice for High Court Source Tells ABC News Much-Discussed Potential Candidate Isn't the White House's Choice for Supreme Court Jul. 19, 2005 - Judge Edith Clement -- perceived by many observers as a potential frontrunner for the Supreme Court seat vacated by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor -- is not President Bush's choice for the high court.

An informed source told ABC News they had spoken with Clement and said she received a phone call from the White House this afternoon. According to the source, Clement was thanked for meeting with the president and sharing her views on the Supreme Court, but that the administration has decided to go in a "different direction."

The White House said Bush will announce his selection tonight at 9 p.m. ET.

A U.S. Court of Appeals judge for the 5th Circuit, Clement was nominated to her current position by Bush and was confirmed by the Senate in November 2001.

Speculation has swirled about the nomination since O'Connor announced her retirement on July 1.

O'Connor, 75, was the first female justice to serve on the High Court, and many speculated that Bush would choose a woman to replace her.

Clement was considered a leading candidate to replace her, along with her colleague on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit in New Orleans, Edith Hollan Jones.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS: baitswitch; edithclement; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

1 posted on 07/19/2005 3:03:21 PM PDT by Checkers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Checkers

A little slow on the draw, aren't ya?


2 posted on 07/19/2005 3:05:34 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Checkers
Uhm, let's start a list of people who are Not Bush's Choice for High Court. Revolting cat! isn't!
3 posted on 07/19/2005 3:05:45 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Hey, I posted the article.


4 posted on 07/19/2005 3:06:22 PM PDT by Checkers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

Commish Isn't either. I love how the administration is putting names out there and then pulling them back after the media gets all frenzied up. hehehe


5 posted on 07/19/2005 3:07:07 PM PDT by commish ((Montgomery, AL) Freedom Tastes Sweetest to Those Who Have Fought to Preserve It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Checkers

Zell Miller, if for no other reason than he wants the state legislators to elect members of the U.S. Senate.


6 posted on 07/19/2005 3:08:08 PM PDT by Ilky Hucktar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Checkers

Yeah... after it had already been posted twice.


7 posted on 07/19/2005 3:08:38 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Checkers

"Source: Clement Not Bush's Choice for High Court Source Tells ABC News".....

OK Dubya.....pick a STRONG CONSERVATIVE.... ex-Judge Roy Moore gets my vote. That would be a fireworks explosion with the leftists however. Screw em... they foisted Ginsburg on us and she is RADICAL left as we know. So Nuke the libs on this one.


8 posted on 07/19/2005 3:10:27 PM PDT by tflabo (Take authority that's ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

Hugh Hewitt says Luttig is walking around a hot DC in "dress-up" clothes.


9 posted on 07/19/2005 3:10:32 PM PDT by Checkers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Did either of them post the article?


10 posted on 07/19/2005 3:11:48 PM PDT by Checkers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Checkers

Doesn't everyone in DC walk around like that, all the time?

No way this pick's going to be a dude.


11 posted on 07/19/2005 3:11:54 PM PDT by Dolphan (God Bless our Military and their families)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

It won't be Zell or Roy Moore.


12 posted on 07/19/2005 3:12:39 PM PDT by Checkers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Checkers

That would be sweet if it's Luttig.


13 posted on 07/19/2005 3:12:44 PM PDT by tflabo (Take authority that's ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Checkers
But was the phone call to Clement made to her in Washington, D.C.? Pajama-clad Freepers said she skipped work, and took a flight to Washington this morning. So, if the source says she was called in New Orleans, somebody's lying.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "The Fry Cook Rule for the Supreme Court"

14 posted on 07/19/2005 3:13:09 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Will President Bush appoint a Justice who obeys the Constitution? I give 95-5 odds on yes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dolphan

The other Edith?


15 posted on 07/19/2005 3:13:24 PM PDT by Checkers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dangus

I think "W" is having a grand old time teasing the MSM. :)


16 posted on 07/19/2005 3:13:53 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Checkers
Hugh Hewitt says Luttig is walking around a hot DC in "dress-up" clothes.

That don't mean nothing -- there's a lotta drag queens in DC!

17 posted on 07/19/2005 3:14:26 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dolphan

Luttig had his family in court with him today also.


18 posted on 07/19/2005 3:15:16 PM PDT by Texas Federalist (No matter what my work/play ratio is, I am never a dull boy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

Good. The MSM have been yanking him around unfairly for too long. Twist em in knots like their devious minds deserve.


19 posted on 07/19/2005 3:15:31 PM PDT by tflabo (Take authority that's ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: tflabo

Nuke 'em.

(The Dems, not Mecca...:>})


20 posted on 07/19/2005 3:16:20 PM PDT by Checkers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson