Skip to comments.
Senate Judiciary Staffers 'Steering' Media Away from Edith Clement (only in the final three)
Red State.org ^
| 7/19/05
Posted on 07/19/2005 1:51:09 PM PDT by gopwinsin04
White House reporter John King at CNN says he is getting 'pushback' from those closely involved in the selection process that he 'should not go there' with Edith Jones Clement.
Update: Within the past hour staffers on the Senate Judiciary Committee have begun steering people away from her.
(Excerpt) Read more at redstate.org ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: edithclement; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
A gentle head fake this morning in the wrong direction?
To: gopwinsin04
Clement, good. Jones, even better. Brown, better still.
2
posted on
07/19/2005 1:52:44 PM PDT
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of news)
To: LS
To: LS
diane sykes!
He better have not changed the balance of the WI supreme court from conservative to liberal for nothing!
To: flashbunny
FR Beats ABC/Hannity by 30 seconds!
To: gopwinsin04
To better steer people away from her I'd put out a table with free refreshments and set up an extra spiked punch bowl.
6
posted on
07/19/2005 1:59:56 PM PDT
by
GSlob
To: gopwinsin04
My top 3 choices are Michael Savage, Janice-Rogers Brown and Mel Gibson
7
posted on
07/19/2005 2:01:56 PM PDT
by
montag813
To: flashbunny
8
posted on
07/19/2005 2:02:04 PM PDT
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of news)
To: LS
Folks, I'm a tellin ya all that our president is mind fuc*ing the libs and the lamestream media. I believe he despises them (rightfully) as much as they despise him (wrongfully).
He knows he is in the cat bird seat with this Rove nonsense and that in the end the moron tin foil hat types are going to once again be forced to extract their foot from their collective mouth. he knows he can get any nominee passed he proposes because the need is for only 2 or 3 of the gang of 7 to bail on the agreement and they have the nuke optiopassed if needed. I believe that required number has already said they would not allow filibustering based on ideology alone. I also think Rehnquist was asked by the president to hold off a bit on his announcement since the court is out of session anyway and a week or 2 or 3 won't matter. I'm sure Bush knows exactly who is other nominees are to be for Rehnquist and the other 2 who may retire before '08.
To: montag813
10
posted on
07/19/2005 2:02:55 PM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: montag813
"My top 3 choices are Michael Savage, Janice-Rogers Brown and Mel Gibson Are you nuts? What about Clint Eastwood?
To: BibChr
12
posted on
07/19/2005 2:04:58 PM PDT
by
deport
(If you want something bad enough, there's someone who will sell it to you. Even the truth your way.)
To: Eagles Talon IV
He has to be having fun with this.
13
posted on
07/19/2005 2:05:02 PM PDT
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of news)
To: LS
diane sykes, former WI supreme court justice.
For some reason, bush picked her for federal appeals court. Her replacement was picked by by liberal governor jim doyle, which turned the court from a conservative marjority to a liberal majority.
She is also the ex wife of conservative author and radio show host charlie sykes.
To: gopwinsin04
Wait a sec..didn't Rove do the same thing for the TIME correspondent?
15
posted on
07/19/2005 2:08:09 PM PDT
by
ken5050
(Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
To: montag813
I'm still holding firm on re-nominating Robert Bork.
To: flashbunny
Be fun to watch Kohl & Feingold go apoplectic, after they both supported pulling her from Wisconsin's high court.
To: gopwinsin04
I think the media and congressional staffers just got the news of the "short list" of Edith Borwn, Edith Clemens and Maura Corrigan, and started speculating it would be Clemens... and speculation turned to rumor.
18
posted on
07/19/2005 2:12:29 PM PDT
by
dangus
To: gopwinsin04
I'm still holding firm on re-nominating Robert Bork. Imagine how the last 20 years would have been different had Reagan not misjudged Senate opposition to Bork. Rehnquist-Bork-Scalia-Thomas--a wall of Conservative power. ah, what should have been. (and Edith Jones instead of milquetoast Souter as #5)
To: gopwinsin04
I still say Ann Coulter is the best choice.
20
posted on
07/19/2005 2:15:10 PM PDT
by
Hugin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson