| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 07/19/2005 5:18:23 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
new thread http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1446387/posts |
Posted on 07/19/2005 9:23:04 AM PDT by Howlin
Edited on 07/19/2005 5:12:12 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
TICK TOCK...............
Gosh, you're a moron. Rove went out of his way to motivate religious conservatives to vote in 2004. And, it WAS the gay marriage issue that was one of the great motivators in getting many that did sit out in 2000 to the ballot box.
No powers at all, just a simple freeper :)
They did, among tons of other "She's not the right one" drivel that was posted.
That ought to tell us something; people here are actively working against our agenda.
Foreshadowing the filibuster.
Excellent :)
unlawfully administers to her, or advises or prescribes for her, or causes any poison, drug, medicine or other noxious thing to be taken by her or, with the like intent, unlawfully uses any instrument or other means whatever, or, with like intent, aids or assists therein, shall, if she dies in consequence thereof, be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not less than five nor more than twenty years; and, if she does not die in consequence thereof, by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than seven years and by a fine of not more than two thousand dollars.
Please, point out for me where this law makes abortion a felony in the state of Mass.
The ONLY way to do that is to overturn Roe and let the people decide the issue. It's called democracy. Overturing Roe will restore the democratic process and end judiciary tyranny.
Ditto! Just look at the Catholics we have on the Supreme Court now...er Scalia, Thomas, and Kennedy. Then there is Rehnquist, a Lutheran, who I consider the closest denomination to Catholics than any other.
http://www.adherents.com/adh_sc.html
Cool, but I think the battle on our side is over now, we have to sit and wait. I think the President likes watching everyone meltdown! LOL, He has a mean streak!
He sure did -- and as Michael Barone said in U.S. News & World Report, they STILL didn't turn out in any significant larger numbers; they voted in the same numbers they did in 2000.
It was the Hispanics.
Please stick to the facts. That statement implies no more, no less, than she is not an activist. To state action otherwise in official capacity as an appelate court Judge would denote activism. Some may welcome activism in the Judiciary, I do not.
The question that needs to be answered is not how she views established precedent as an appelate Judge. The question that needs to be answered is how she views precedent as a Supreme Court Justice.
Look at Boxer's comments. It's Jones. It has to be.
Keep your fingers crossed and hope Bush nominated Edith Hollan Jones. Then, we won't have anything to worry about.
You try to make it sound as though anyone that disagrees with you about tactics is pro abortion. Not true. I'd support Jones without hesitation. I just don't believe that overturning Roe is good politics. I want to preserve the pub majority AND do away with abortion. The best way to do that is to chip away at it until there is no constituency left.
"Its all going to come down to 'Does Edith Jones like Ruth's Chris and did she attend the Freedom Concert?' Here only saving grace may be if she sent a lobstergram."
Thank you for your brilliant insight into the fate of millions of innocent lives.
I saw it in post 57. It came from a Yahoo News report.
I asked you in Freepmail not to reply to me again; I deleted your last Freepmail to me. Take a hint.
Are they worth saving???????????? this from a AF medic and emt.......
As if Boxer has a clue. Please!! You think she has inside information? You think she knows more than the rest of us? BOX-O-ROX?????
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.