| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 07/19/2005 5:18:23 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
new thread http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1446387/posts |
Posted on 07/19/2005 9:23:04 AM PDT by Howlin
Edited on 07/19/2005 5:12:12 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
TICK TOCK...............
How many votes will the pubs lose if you and Pat Robertson start running the country?
Not makin' that mistook again....
By what legal method could this be done?
second hand, but a Texas Fed Soc member says that they heard from someone who works at the court in New Orl.
Hopefully somewhere someone got something wrong...or they do to her what they did to Judge Jones back in the Souter days....bring her up and then trot out someone else.
This is my problem. You think and you fear. You have no proof to validate either. I'm not interesting in feelings. I want facts.
I understand the source of the fear, but I have no use for it.
From what I've seen the question isn't whether she is a solid Judge in rulings but whether she is opposed to overturning bad precedent set by the Supremes if she becomes a member of that court. That is the direction to take this inquiry.
No question there are other Judges that the base would know this answer to on hearing their name. But, so far, Clement is leading the possible replacement stakes and I want to know how she feels about this. Anything else is a distraction.
If that's true, this is a bigger outrage than Alberto Gonzales being nominated.
check this out
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1446135/posts
Sen. Boxer Calls Nomination of Supreme Court Justice " an Extraordinary Circumstance"
Fox News
Posted on 07/19/2005 2:33:16 PM EDT by fedupjohn
Senator Barbara Boxer appearing on Fox News this afternoon was asked about the 'Gang of Seven' deal not to Filibuster nominees unless it is Extra-ordinary circumstances; declared that "with the right to privacy and Roe v Wade on the table this is an Extra-ordinary circumstance and the Filibuster is on the table".
Well people they just moved the goal posts.
Bush doesn't care about who has their name out there in the rumor mill. He cares about who he wants.
AGREED!
If anything, having her be the only name floating might make Bush LESS likely to pick her.
What? I need the background of that remark.
From your lips to God's ears!
Why would he do this to his nominee? Naming the person this early is going to mean they have to endure a long pounding.
Can anyone take a look at tradesports.com com and see who is winning their Supreme Court futures contracts?
Can't check that site at work right now.
Ted Kennedy and John Kerry are Catholics. Saying she is a catholic is not reassuring.
I'm shocked, SHOCKED that the DemonRATs would act like demons.
Comments?
Back off the incendiary statements. We can all disagree without losing composure.
Well, wonders never cease. I loathe that toad of a woman.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.