Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why would you assume nobody crosses over? (Help us, we've been zotted!)
Register Guard ^ | June 26, 2005 | James Chaney

Posted on 07/17/2005 7:46:15 AM PDT by joe_oak

June 26, 2005

Guest Viewpoint: The party's over for betrayed Republican

By James Chaney
As of today, after 25 years, I am no longer a Republican.

I take this step with deep regret, and with a deep sense of betrayal.

I still believe in the vast power of markets to inspire ideas, motivate solutions and eliminate waste. I still believe in international vigilance and a strong defense, because this world will always be home to people who will avidly seek to take or destroy what we have built as a nation. I still believe in the protection of individuals and businesses from the influence and expense of an over-involved government. I still believe in the hand-in-hand concepts of separation of church and state and absolute freedom to worship, in the rights of the states to govern themselves without undo federal interference, and in the host of other things that defined me as a Republican.

My problem is this: I believe in principles and ideals which my party has systematically discarded in the last 10 years.

My Republican Party was the party of Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, Dwight Eisenhower, Barry Goldwater, and George H.W. Bush. It was a party of honesty and accountability. It was a party of tolerance, and practicality and honor. It was a party that faced facts and dealt with reality, and that crafted common-sense solutions to problems based on the facts as they were, not as we wished them to be, or even worse, as we made them up. It was a party that told the truth, even when the truth came hard. And now, it is none of those things.

Fifty years from now, the Republican Party of this era will be judged by how we provided for the nation's future on three core issues: how we led the world on the environment, how we minded the business of running our country in such a way that we didn't go bankrupt, and whether we gracefully accepted our place on the world's stage as its only superpower. Sadly, we have built the foundation for dismal failure on all three counts. And we've done it in such a way that we shouldn't be surprised if neither the American people nor the world ever trusts us again.

My party has repeatedly ignored, discarded and even invented science to suit its needs, most spectacularly as to global warming. We have an opportunity and the responsibility to lead the world on this issue, but instead we've chosen greed, shortsightedness and deliberate ignorance.

We have mortgaged the country's fiscal future in a way that no Democratic Congress or administration ever did, and to justify the tax cuts that brought us here, we've simply changed the rules. I matured as a Republican believing that uncontrolled deficit spending is harmful and irresponsible; I still do. But the party has yet to explain to me why it's a good thing now, other than to say "... because we say so."

Our greatest failure, though, has been in our role as superpower. This world needs justice, democracy and compassion, and as the keystone of those things, it needs one thing above all else: truth.

Republican decisions made in 2002 and 2003 have killed almost 2,000 of the most capable patriots our country has to offer - volunteers, every one. Support for those decisions was gathered through what appeared at the time to be spin and marketing, but which now turns out to have been deliberate planning and falsehood. The Blair government's internal documentation only confirms what has been suspected for years: Americans are dying every day for Republican lies first crafted in 2002, expanded and embellished upon in 2003, and which continue to this day. This calculated deception is now burned into the legacy of the party, every bit as much as Reagan's triumph in the Cold War, or Nixon's disgrace over Watergate.

I could go on and on - about how we have compromised our international integrity by sanctioning torture, about how we are systematically dismantling the civil liberties that it took us two centuries to define and preserve, and about how we have substituted bullying, brinksmanship and "staying on message" for real political discourse - but those three issues are enough.

We're poisoning our planet through gluttony and ignorance.

We're teetering on the brink of self-inflicted insolvency.

We're selfishly and needlessly sacrificing the best of a generation.

And we're lying about it.

While it has compiled this record of failure and deception, the party which I'm leaving today has spent its time, energy and political capital trying to save Terri Schiavo, battling the threat of single-sex unions, fighting medical marijuana and physician-assisted suicide, manufacturing political crises over presidential nominees, and selling privatized Social Security to an America that isn't buying. We fiddle while Rome burns.

Enough is enough. I quit.

James Chaney is a Eugene attorney who has been in private practice for more than 20 years, and who has been a registered Republican since 1980.

GUEST VIEWPOINT


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: 1i; 2; 3topost; 4thiscrap; 5becauseim; 6an; 7insane; 8liberal; banned; bannedonsight; barfalert; bombmeplease; bravosierra; catchow; ciakitty; crapforbrains; du; dumbdumbdumber; dumbest; dumdems; dutroll; fbikitty; gotzot; herekittykitty; ibz; idiot; indymediatroll; ir; joepine; karlrove; kerryvoter; kittychow; kittyfood; livinlavidazoto; moron; oopsididitagain; oopsizottedagain; ozone; rateatroll; rino; roadkill; rove; seeya; seeyajoe; signedup; signeduptopostthis; troll; vikingkitties; vk; wheresthenuke; wwwaaahhh; yeahright; zot; zotalot; zotarama; zotatroll; zotbait; zotmebaby; zotmebabyonemoretime; zotmedaily; zotmehard; zotmeharder; zotmeharderbaby; zotmeimaliberal; zotmeplease; zotmetillipuke; zotmeweekly; zotmezotmezotme; zotsfortots; zotted; zottilludrop; zotty; zotzotzot; zuluoscartango; zzzzzzzzzzz; zzzzzzzzzzzot; zzzzzzzzzzzzzzot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-186 next last
To: Tijeras_Slim
My Republican Party was the party of Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, Dwight Eisenhower, Barry Goldwater, and George H.W. Bush

Funny, no mention of Reagan.

41 posted on 07/17/2005 8:01:36 AM PDT by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: joe_oak
Welcome to Free Republic.
Sounds more like the written version of one of those 'seminar callers' Rush Limbaugh has talked about.
Michael Bloomberg ( mayor of New York ) is a 'Republican', but only because that's how he could win office. Bloomberg has very little in common with the Republican party.
42 posted on 07/17/2005 8:01:44 AM PDT by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joe_oak

"We have mortgaged the country's fiscal future in a way that no Democratic Congress or administration ever did"

Uhh... where was he in the mid-60's when all of these disasterously expensive programs were started?


43 posted on 07/17/2005 8:02:00 AM PDT by Betaille ("I turned 21 in prison doin' life without parole" Merle Haggard (lyrics))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joe_oak

Let me make sure that I understand this correctly. We are being asked to consider as valid the thoughts of a LAWYER ? ? ?.

Worse yet, we are asked to ignore the fact that this is a lawyer from Eugene, Oregon ? ? ?

Eugene, Oregon - as in "The People's Republic of Eugene?


44 posted on 07/17/2005 8:02:43 AM PDT by GladesGuru ("In a society predicated upon liberty, it is essential to examine principles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joe_oak

I vote ZOT now!!


45 posted on 07/17/2005 8:03:11 AM PDT by Thomas Truxtun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joe_oak

"We're teetering on the brink of self-inflicted insolvency."

Hmm.. I'm willing to bet this guy felt the exact opposite way in 1994 when the Republicans were bold in trying to elminate the deficit. By the way, didn't the deficit just cut in half because of economic growth?


46 posted on 07/17/2005 8:03:27 AM PDT by Betaille ("I turned 21 in prison doin' life without parole" Merle Haggard (lyrics))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joe_oak
gcochran, who was banned for his outspoken hatred of the Bush Administration, would have loved this guy.

On foreign policy I took the position that the Administration was justified in manipulating the evidence to take us to war, that a long line of war-time Presidents going back at least to Polk had done just that. But he would have none of it. He said his ancestors, all the way back to Revolutionary days, had fought for a government which was honest with its citizens and he was not going to break with them. He thought the Arabs were a weak people, easily controlled with sanctions and inspections, and that the price we would pay for breaking our international commitments and reneging on our obligations would permanently damage us.

47 posted on 07/17/2005 8:04:36 AM PDT by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joe_oak
James Chaney is a Eugene attorney who has been in private practice for more than 20 years, and who has been a registered Republican since 1980.

The problem is if this guy believes what he does on each of the issues he lists in this piece, he could not possibly have ever voted for a Republican unless the Republicans in Eugene are Democrats. Either that or he hasn't a clue as to how the Republican Party evolved after Nixon, or even Goldwater.

My guess is this guy reads "law" stuff and not much else. In Minneapolis we have some sports writers that have talk radio shows. They spend a good deal of time on the shows talking politics. I find a couple of them to be superb sports writers. It's obvious when they venture into other venues they are illiterate. Perhaps our friend from Eugene is of the same ilk.

48 posted on 07/17/2005 8:04:47 AM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joe_oak; Admin Moderator

Marks of a troll:

1. Post an article on the first day of membership.
2. Post a REALLY STUPID article on the first day of membership.
3. Do not interact with replies to REALLY STUPID article on first day of membership.

Looking bad.

Dan


49 posted on 07/17/2005 8:04:51 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roylene
Oh so many democrat talking points. What a fake.

That was my reaction as well, particularly since it was posted by somebody who just signed up today. However, a little Googling demonstrates that the article at least is real and that the author is in fact who he is alleged to be. So, the question boils down to how real a Republican he ever was and whether Republican values have in fact changed in some significant way.

50 posted on 07/17/2005 8:05:37 AM PDT by blau993 (Labs for love; .357 for Security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: joe_oak

Eugene as in Oregon?

Yeah, right. After glancing at the article I noticed a bunch of lies.

Don't let the door......


51 posted on 07/17/2005 8:05:46 AM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (Vote a Straight Republican Ballot. Rid the country of dems. NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stevem

Did I get in before the ZOT?


52 posted on 07/17/2005 8:06:05 AM PDT by Malichi (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: joe_oak

BLAH BLAH BLAH.
So who will he vote for? Teddy and Hillary..there is some honesty there for him.


53 posted on 07/17/2005 8:06:18 AM PDT by joyce11111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joe_oak
My problem is this: I believe in principles and ideals which my party has systematically discarded in the last 10 years.

Someone who claims principles and ideals isn't going to "cross over" at least not to the demonrats. If a person was truely a Republican or conservative, and believed in the values of our founding fathers, they might become disillusioned at the Pubbies since Ronald Reagan, but they would also realise that the demonrats have been systematically discarding principal and ideals for the last 75 years. With increased vigor the last 20.

Anybody who would voluntarily associate themselves with the party of Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Al Gore, Ted Kennedy, Harry Reid, Tom Daschle, Howard Dean, and others, OBVIOUSLY knows nothing about priciples and ideals.

54 posted on 07/17/2005 8:07:27 AM PDT by mountn man (Everyone brings joy into a room. Some when they enter. Others when they leave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joe_oak
My problem is this: I believe in principles and ideals which my party has systematically discarded in the last 10 years.

And what happened 10 years ago? Oh that's right--the Republicans took control of both the House and the Senate, sending the Dems into a tailspin from which they have yet to recover. (And some would argue that they have already crashed.)

55 posted on 07/17/2005 8:07:33 AM PDT by silent_jonny (I miss you, Tammy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stevem

Well, there is something to be said for fiscal discipline and "Peace through strength". The problem is, the people who are complaining about that now are the same people who would oppose Republicans on budget cuts also. Also, peace through stregth only works if you prove that you will use your stregth when necessary.


56 posted on 07/17/2005 8:07:38 AM PDT by Betaille ("I turned 21 in prison doin' life without parole" Merle Haggard (lyrics))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: joe_oak
My Republican Party was the party of Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, Dwight Eisenhower, Barry Goldwater, and George H.W. Bush.

This is your really big mess up! Anyone claiming to be a Republican and his list of Republican is this list is very suspicious to me.

How many of us would put GHWB in our list and omit Ronald Reagan?

I, too, vote ZOT!

57 posted on 07/17/2005 8:07:50 AM PDT by basil (Exercise your Second Amendment--buy another gun today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joe_oak
James Chaney is a Eugene attorney

Eugene? As in Eugene, Oregon? Say no more. This is pure BS

58 posted on 07/17/2005 8:08:10 AM PDT by daybreakcoming (May God bless those who enter the valley of the shadow of death so that we may see the light of day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley

I dreamed I saw Joe Oak last night,
Alive as you and me.
Says I "But Joe, you're ten minutes banned"
"I never died" said he,
"I never died" said he.
"In Salt Lake, Joe," says I to him,
him standing by my bed,
"They framed you on a insanity charge,"
Says Joe, "But I ain't dead,"
Says Joe, "But I ain't dead."
"The Admin Mods Zotted you Joe,
they zot you Joe" says I.
"Takes more than kitties to kill a man"
Says Joe "I didn't die"
Says Joe "I didn't die"
And standing there as big as life
and smiling with his eyes.
Says Joe "What they can never Zot
went on to troll,
went on to troll"
From San Diego up to Maine,
in every mine and mill,
where girly-men defend their rights,
it's there you find Joe Oak,
it's there you find Joe Oak!
I dreamed I saw Joe Oak last night,
alive as you and me.
Says I "But Joe, you're ten minutes banned "
"I never died" said he,
"I never died" said he.


59 posted on 07/17/2005 8:08:31 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Now that taglines are cool, I refuse to have one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: roylene
Oh so many democrat talking points. What a fake.

I have to admit that I happen to know someone who was really a life long republican but now, because of hatred for the Iraq war, spouts every democratic talking point. A complete 180 in every category. Of course he is a journalism professor so perhaps it was in the cards all along.

60 posted on 07/17/2005 8:09:28 AM PDT by KJacob (If I yawn it is only in anticipation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-186 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson