Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nature wins in nurture debate
The Sunday Times ^ | July 11, 2005 | Lois Rogers

Posted on 07/15/2005 1:31:47 PM PDT by nickcarraway

NEW YORK: Scientists have raised new questions about free will, with some of the first evidence that the way people behave towards each other can be controlled by their genes rather than their environment and upbringing.

They have found that people with a rare genetic mutation known as Williams syndrome have brains that work abnormally in social situations, producing erratic and inappropriate behaviour.

The finding implies that humans' social interactions are pre-programmed to some extent and that external influences - "nurture" in contrast to "nature" - may be less important.

The researchers, at the National Institute of Mental Health in America, will publish their findings today in Nature Neuroscience.

The institute's director, Thomas Insel, said: "Social interactions are central to human experience and well-being and are adversely affected in psychiatric illness. This may be the first study to identify functional disturbances in a brain pathway associated with abnormal social behaviour caused by a genetic disorder."

The researchers compared brains of people with Williams syndrome with those of healthy volunteers.

People with Williams syndrome are missing about 21 genes on chromosome 7, a deficit that makes it hard for them to judge how to respond to social situations.

They are impulsive in their behaviour towards others, often starting conversations with complete strangers and acting in an over-friendly fashion.

Conversely, they often become anxious and agitated in non-social situations where there is no real cause for alarm.

Researchers have suspected such behaviour is linked to abnormalities in the way information is processed in the amygdala, which lies deep in the brain and plays an important role in governing social behaviour.

In the normal volunteers, researchers found a complex neuron network through which the amygdala was controlled.

For people with Williams syndrome, by contrast, these networks had been disrupted. One implication of the study is that genetic testing could pick out children with Williams syndrome. Their schooling could be adapted accordingly.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: biology; brain; disorders; genetics; naturevsnurture; science

1 posted on 07/15/2005 1:31:47 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Williams syndrome

No doubt named after Robin Williams.

2 posted on 07/15/2005 1:33:52 PM PDT by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
...brains that work abnormally in social situations, producing erratic and inappropriate behaviour.

Perhaps showing the people violent movies with classical music will make them stop...

3 posted on 07/15/2005 1:35:09 PM PDT by BostonianRightist (I don't trust a government I can't shoot back at.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
They are impulsive in their behaviour towards others, often starting conversations with complete strangers and acting in an over-friendly fashion.

This is more commonly referred to as midwesternism.

4 posted on 07/15/2005 1:35:23 PM PDT by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
They have found that people with a rare genetic mutation known as Williams syndrome have brains that work abnormally in social situations, producing erratic and inappropriate behaviour.

OK, let's take extreme abnormalities and make generalizations about other peoples behavior....

5 posted on 07/15/2005 1:37:10 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

Conversely, they often become anxious and agitated in non-social situations where there is no real cause for alarm.

**

But this would not be a normal midwesterner. This would be a woodyallener.


6 posted on 07/15/2005 1:37:20 PM PDT by saveliberty (Liberal= in need of therapy, but would rather ruin lives of those less fortunate to feel good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

While one nurtures nature, can one nurture naturally. IE Is nuturing a natural act?


7 posted on 07/15/2005 1:38:25 PM PDT by JmyBryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

So, homosexuality is in one's jeans--uh, GENES.


8 posted on 07/15/2005 1:39:01 PM PDT by Ff--150 (Being Enriched in Everything, to All Bountifulness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

LOL! This is what social science is all about-- making stuff up, arguing how it's justified and then publishing it.

You can make all the economists lie down in a line, head to toe and you would never reach a conclusion.


9 posted on 07/15/2005 1:39:04 PM PDT by saveliberty (Liberal= in need of therapy, but would rather ruin lives of those less fortunate to feel good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty

Correction - social science in general these days

LOL!


10 posted on 07/15/2005 1:40:31 PM PDT by saveliberty (Liberal= in need of therapy, but would rather ruin lives of those less fortunate to feel good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
The finding implies that humans' social interactions are pre-programmed to some extent and that external influences - "nurture" in contrast to "nature" - may be less important.

It's good to know whatever I do is not my fault. It was due to a genetic mutation 1,000,000 years ago.
11 posted on 07/15/2005 1:46:10 PM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
They have found that people with a rare genetic mutation known as Williams syndrome have brains that work abnormally in social situations, producing erratic and inappropriate behaviour.

It may be that our tendencies (e.g. the easiest way to behave) is genetic, but that doesn't mean it cannot be overcome.

12 posted on 07/15/2005 1:46:39 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
There is evidence of a genetic behavioral link in Turner's Syndrome (a single X chromosome), too. Depending on which parent the X comes from, the behavior will be different.

People like to pretend that the mind and body are distinct entities but chemical disorders, brain damage, and certain other disorders sure do suggest otherwise.

13 posted on 07/15/2005 1:48:18 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

We call'em hookers.


14 posted on 07/15/2005 1:48:44 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Can I still blame my mother for everything?


15 posted on 07/15/2005 1:49:38 PM PDT by fullchroma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fullchroma

I think you can blame her for even more now.


16 posted on 07/15/2005 2:34:48 PM PDT by WireAndWood (But first, the tranya. I hope that you relish it as much as I.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson