ROTFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!
Posted on 07/14/2005 1:50:45 PM PDT by Pukin Dog
Don’t ask me, because you know I won’t tell you how I came across this information.
Here is the scoop.
This is all about the Supreme Court.
With the knowledge that Rove was Matthew Cooper’s background source regarding the Plame incident, no matter the fact that no laws were broken, the Democrats leaped upon the matter as a way for Democrats and the MSM to possibly prevent Bush from changing the makeup of the Supreme Court. Under normal circumstances, Democrats cannot stop Bush from reshaping the Supreme Court, and that has Democrats terrified. They cannot sustain a Filibuster without Frist invoking the Nuclear Option on them, so they only have one last option, which is now underway.
The Democrats must demonize Bush to the degree that they can then begin their long-awaited impeachment articles, with the MSM in tow. If Congress can introduce articles of impeachment against Bush, then the MSM will demand that Bush postpone any nominations to the Supreme Court until the matter is decided. It is the only hope they have left of preventing a Conservative Supreme Court from taking hold, and if they do not accomplish this, the flow of money into Democratic coffers will stop instantaneously.
Next week, you will begin to hear Democrats suggesting that if Bush does not fire Karl Rove, then he is guilty of “Obstruction of Justice” and “Lying to the American People” in order to protect a friend. The Media will play along dutifully, because it was there idea in the first place.
Forget about Judith Miller.
Because the Special Prosecutor has asked the White House not to discuss the matter, no one will be able to inform Miller or the NY Times on how Miller should lie to save herself. Without that knowledge, the Times will not let her testify at all. They are paying her to be silent, and it is they who are actually guilty of ‘Obstruction of Justice’ Miller knows who the leaker is, and you all know who I believe that person to be.
What you all are about to see, is the most coordinated, vicious attack ever in the history of Politics against this administration, because those involved have everything at stake. Without control of the Supreme Court, the Liberal agenda is dead for the next 30-40 years. All of their Environmental nonsense, Abortion, Private Property, Affirmative Action and Civil Rights issues go right down the tubes.
The Bush Administration is aware of what is to come, and might be able to prevent it with a little ‘inside baseball’ but the looniest on the left will attempt this no matter what the outcome.
Expect editorials next week, arguing whether or not it is fair for a president who “stole the first election” and won the second election by the “smallest margin of any incumbent President” who is “embroiled in a National Security Scandal” to be deciding on the makeup of the Supreme Court. At the same time, Liberal Senators will begin to suggest that Conformation hearings on anyone Bush selects should be postponed until the investigations are over. Unfortunately for our side, they have an alley in one Arlen Specter. They will be leaning heavily on him to go along with delayed hearings. Specter is already angry with Bush over the Stem-cell research issue.
Will it work? No. Why? Because Bush understands the law, and also understands (with Rove’s help) that no matter how loud and long the Democrats scream, they and the MSM really cant do anything about the Supreme Court, but can effect public opinion. Bush, by telling Republicans to shut up about his choice, has set precedent for when he tells (by his Supreme Court selections) the Democrats the same thing. If he ignores both sides, he can just choose who he wants, and that is exactly what he will do.
So get ready for an ugly, ugly Summer and Fall. Don’t expect to hear much from Bush on Rove, or the Courts after he makes his selections. Republicans in Congress will also be silent (except Specter and Hagel) and will not risk their own re-elections and legacies to side with Democrats this time round.
So there it is, take it or leave it. I wont answer any questions about how or where I got the information, so don’t ask me.
-PD
If wrong is wrong then get educated on this and stop puking out the MSM/DNC talking points. Then admit that you are WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!! No offense to Pukin Dog on this matter.
His source must be the same source Jim Angle used tonight. (I think it wss him. Was listening on XM.) Anyway PukinDog got it first!
Patently untrue.
Rove never named Valerie Plame by name !
That IS the LEAK you just denied. He referred to her as Wilson's wife. Big distinction!
the law covering covert agents, did NOT cover Valerie Plame!
That's not the law I've been talking about. I'm talkin bout COWBOY law!
President Bush didn't out anyones and he is far more intelligent than you'll ever be, if you live to be 110!
President Bush out someone?
President Bush is the privileged son of a privileged son and obviously has a room temperature IQ. He has enjoyed a lifetime of free passes and forgiven/forgotten f'ups (not unlike the Kennedys in the tweedledee party).
I'm married to an early rising nurse.
Nighty night.
..perhaps, That is what is getting the 'Rats/LMSM so upset..and nobody except us is paying attention to them.
bookmark
I'm thinking you could be right.
I didn't say he outed her!!! But are you disputing that he told Matt Cooper that she worked for the CIA? Both and his lawyer admitted that he did that. The point of whether she was covert or not, or whether what Rove did was illegal is moot to this discussion. My question is why does Judith Miller have anything to fear if it were she who told someone in the White House that Plame worked for the CIA?
And all this time I thought you were kiddin bout bein a Congressman. ;-)
You should have waited an hour to take the blue pill,it is all used up now. Nighty night Mr Carville.
I'm with you on this one. Time to put an end to these types of maneuvers by the Dumborats.
So you're saying that people in the State Dept. and the CIA would leak classified information to the NY Times in order to get Karl Rove? If that's what you're saying, then I guess I understand. Although it would have to pretty new classified information, since Karl Rove still has his security clearance, which I would expect is higher than anyone at least in the State Dept. I don't get my other point, which is why should Judith Miller fear testifying that she told the White House that Plame worked for the CIA?
Things are no where as apocalyptic as you would have us believe. If Bush does get his 1 or 2 appointments do you think they are going to be Scalia and Thomas lookalikes? I don't think so. The Spectres, Chafees, Snowes et. al. will see to that. I fully expect another Sandra Day O'Connor.
And even if he were to get 2 Ann Coulters on the SC, a) there are too many clinton appointees in the lower courts to overturn all their decisions and b) a lot of time decisions don't get overturned because they're "settled law".
Again, I think you have it largely correct, I would just tone down the rhetoric a few notches.
I don't think what Rove did is necessarily a leak. He talked to a reporter. He gave information. You think Rove never talks to reporters? You think Bush never has Rove talk to reporters?
And your cheap shot at the President indicates you do need some rest. So good night.
Even worse, we have nude pictures of reno,Hellery,Mikulski,and others blown up and pasted in front of them 24-7. They have their choice of the pictures or the hot branding iron. Whatta choice!!!!!!! ROTFLMAO!
ROTFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!
Because she probably heard it from a big lib reporter or from that Commie Creep pinkus.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.