Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hurricane Emily
NHC-NOAA ^ | 13 July 2005 | NHC

Posted on 07/13/2005 7:11:21 PM PDT by NautiNurse

Hurricane Emily resources--the links are self-updating for handy reference:

NHC Hurricane Public Advisory Updates Currently published every three hours 5A, 8A, 11A, 2P, etc. ET.

NHC Hurricane Discussion Updates Published every 6 hours 5A, 11A, 5P, 11P ET

Caribbean IR Loop

Caribbean Visible Loop (Only works during daylight hours)

Puerto Rico Long Range Radar Loop

Hurricane Track Forecast

Hurricane Model Projections

Emily Forecast Track Archive Loop Great for reviewing the 3 day and 5 day historic track positions




TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: emily; hurricane; hurricaneemily; weather
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740741-760761-780781-792 last
To: All
Hurricane Emily Live Thread, Part II
781 posted on 07/16/2005 1:36:07 PM PDT by NautiNurse ("I'd rather see someone go to work for a Republican campaign than sit on their butt."--Howard Dean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 780 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

Wow. Everything shut down due to hurricane damage, no power, dirt, bugs, food gone bad, and excessive humid heat. What a great setting to experience several days of the Aztec 2-step.


782 posted on 07/16/2005 1:38:39 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 774 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
I'm not saying that we're out of the woods on this storm. A lot could change between now and next Wednesday. But if the forecasters are pretty confident that Emily will spend some time on the Yucatan, it does make me feel more comfortable. A hurricane cannot maintain its strength over land, no matter how flat it is. The core is no longer being fed.

Feeder bands are a misnomer. They don't feed the storm. Only the core does.

783 posted on 07/16/2005 1:38:53 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 779 | View Replies]

To: nwctwx

Thank you for breaking the image rule. I have a very slow dial up and your maps and images save me a lot of time trying to find pictures on my own. I appreciate it.


784 posted on 07/16/2005 1:40:59 PM PDT by NanaDory8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 710 | View Replies]

To: NanaDory8

I try to keep the image small, was posting thumbnails last night... but, it's not often we see a storm like this, figured it was worth throwing one out there. ;-)


785 posted on 07/16/2005 1:43:38 PM PDT by nwctwx (Everything I need to know, I learned on the Threat Matrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 784 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

I think they're too far south too, but that's what their models are saying.


786 posted on 07/16/2005 2:09:47 PM PDT by SouthTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 745 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

Emily is a Texas hurricane, the low over east Texas does not appear to be weaken at all, in fact my B here in Galveston country is starting to fall again, 29.8 from 29.83.


787 posted on 07/16/2005 3:14:36 PM PDT by jpsb (I already know I am a terrible speller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 745 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

let's see what Emily does with the Yucatan, I do not think Emily is going to slame into the Yucan, graze maybe, shot the gap maybe. Slame into no.


788 posted on 07/16/2005 3:18:15 PM PDT by jpsb (I already know I am a terrible speller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 741 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
let's see what Emily does with the Yucatan, I do not think Emily is going to slame into the Yucan, graze maybe, shot the gap maybe. Slame into no.

Sure hope you are right about it shooting the gap, but the images I am seeing are showing it too far south to make that a reasonable hope at this point. Perhaps you have some different/better views then I do.

789 posted on 07/17/2005 7:45:53 AM PDT by FarmerW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 788 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

On the news last night we saw people boarding the plane for Cozumel. I couldn't believe people would be so stupid.


790 posted on 07/17/2005 8:09:32 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 774 | View Replies]

To: FarmerW

No, looks like I was wrong. again.


791 posted on 07/17/2005 10:52:59 AM PDT by jpsb (I already know I am a terrible speller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 789 | View Replies]

To: All

Do y'all want a new thread started for this evening?


792 posted on 07/19/2005 1:18:33 PM PDT by NautiNurse ("I'd rather see someone go to work for a Republican campaign than sit on their butt."--Howard Dean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 791 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740741-760761-780781-792 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson