Posted on 07/11/2005 7:42:44 AM PDT by Alexander Rubin
It wasnt long after the smoke began to clear that the serial terrorism apologists started coming out of the woodwork. "Its Americas fault that this happened." they say. "If they hadnt started that war in Afghanistan and Iraq, then the bombing wouldnt have happened."
Whats interesting is that this excuse is being made by both leftist politicians in the West as well as people of Middle Eastern descent everywhere else in the world.
The Director of the Institute of Islamic Thought in London, Dr Azam al-Tamimi, while condemning the bombings as barbaric, took the opportunity to criticize Tony Blair.
"If there is some party that should be held accountable for killing the innocent and spreading terror and chaos among the British people, it should be the government of Tony Blair," al-Tamimi told Aljazeera. He said it was a combination of actions on the part of the British government that led to the attack. Among these are Britains support of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the alleged abuse of Muslim prisoners being held in London and Guantanamo Bay.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
Depravity prevents anyone from seeing or understanding truth. Poor Klaus...
Here is the whole article. It is worth reading completely:
It wasnt long after the smoke began to clear that the serial terrorism apologists started coming out of the woodwork. "Its Americas fault that this happened." they say. "If they hadnt started that war in Afghanistan and Iraq, then the bombing wouldnt have happened."
Whats interesting is that this excuse is being made by both leftist politicians in the West as well as people of Middle Eastern descent everywhere else in the world.
The Director of the Institute of Islamic Thought in London, Dr Azam al-Tamimi, while condemning the bombings as barbaric, took the opportunity to criticize Tony Blair.
"If there is some party that should be held accountable for killing the innocent and spreading terror and chaos among the British people, it should be the government of Tony Blair," al-Tamimi told Aljazeera. He said it was a combination of actions on the part of the British government that led to the attack. Among these are Britains support of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the alleged abuse of Muslim prisoners being held in London and Guantanamo Bay.
Al-Tamimi even claimed that Blairs recent comments against "extremists" after his return from Singapore where London was awarded the 2012 Olympics, was a veiled reference against Muslims.
Back home, many callers of obvious Middle Eastern origin to talk radio programs claim that the bombing was "retribution" for what America and Britain had done in the Middle East.
Lets see, they forcibly removed a psychopathic dictator from Iraq who murdered over 400,00 of his own people and vowed to incinerate Israel with nuclear weapons as soon as he could develop them. In addition, they forcibly removed the Taliban from power in Afghanistan, after terrorists trained in Taliban-sponsored camps attacked the United States and killed 3,000 of its citizens.
Hearing these individuals on the radio and reading their letters to the editors, one can only conclude that they are totally in agreement with these heinous acts, despite their condemnation of them.
I noted with interest that the head of the Canadian Islamic Congress, Dr. Mohammad Elmasry who is a professor at Waterloo University condemned the London Bombings, yet in the same statement says hat he "hopes Canadian Muslims do not pay the guilty-by-association price". Thats a curious statement, considering that no Canadian Muslims have been harmed as a result of any terrorist acts anywhere. Elmasry must be a master of Goebbels-style propaganda to be able to turn an atrocity that happened in London into a fear of imagined attacks against Canadian Muslims. It positively reeks of narcissism.
To get a real look at what the Canadian Islamic Congress is all about, one need merely read its communiqués about events in the Middle East. On February 19, 2005 a communiqué was issued that included among other things:
"To date, the American-led invasion of Iraq has resulted in the deaths of more than 100,000 Iraqis and thousands of Americans. Iraq has been transformed from country with 100% employment and a stable public service infrastructure, into an impoverished nation in disarray, with more than half of its adult workforce jobless. From being one of the leading Middle East states in administration, education and health care, Iraq has fallen to one of the world's most disadvantaged societies.
"The CIC is charging that America's aggressive Middle East policies are designed primarily to shore up Israel's military power and economic advantages in the region, while attempting to divert world attention from Israel's territorial expansion into the West Bank through illegal Jews-only settlements."
What they are really saying is that human rights mean nothing and any dictator or murderer that is opposed to Israel is their friend, which I suppose falls under that famous Arab saying, "the enemy of my enemy is my friend".
There has been a lot of discussion about the likelihood of a terrorist attack happening in Canada. I personally believe that the next terrorist outrage will be committed on Canadian soil, as Canada was identified as the fifth most important Christian country to be targeted, following the U.S., the UK, Australia and Spain. When this attack comes, we can only blame ourselves for not having the fortitude or forbearance to monitor our borders more closely.
If people like Elmasry are legitimate and respected immigrants, we can only imagine what individuals with real terrorist intentions must be like. My guess is well soon find out.
Klaus Rohrich is columnist with Canada Free Press. He can be reached at: letters@canadafreepress.com.
No mention of the fact that the 9/11 attack occured BEFORE we were at war with anyone. Serial apologists - no, that should be knee jerk apologists - at work again.
I can't begin to imagine what the reaction would be if this did happen, which I most sincerely hope it does not.
>>>It wasnt long after the smoke began to clear that the serial terrorism apologists started coming out of the woodwork. "Its Americas fault that this happened." they say. "If they hadnt started that war in Afghanistan and Iraq, then the bombing wouldnt have happened.">>>
Yes, since there have been no mass murders by Muslim terrorists BEFORE Afghanistan and Iraq.
The Director of the Institute of Islamic Thought in London, Dr Azam al-Tamimi
Ah, one who wishes the jihadists the best success. I wonder exactly what a director of Islamic Thought does for a living?
I am sure death threats have been pouring in to this writer for telling the truth.....about a "peacful" religion.
Chamberlin apologized to Hitler for Poland being in the way of his army at one time too. Can anyone name a prominent and legitament Islamic leader? What was he said about terrorism?
Maybe we do have it all wrong.
The diabolical mullahs bear responsibility.
It is they who are receiving money for brainwashing other people's children into suicide for sex and mass murder, while using the money for this madness to care for their own children. Also, muslims all over the world who give money to charities that they know full well are committing these atrocities.
The baby boomers created an environment where they take no responsibility. It's always the government's fault, religion's fault, society's fault. Anyone who can see in black and white is a target.
It's too hard for these crybabies to understand that the change has to happen with them. A protest is no solution to problems, action is.
You know, the usual things these stinking islamic scum do.
Oh...some liberal feel good, anti-traditional values, resolution...intermarriage between species?
I too pray this does not happen. However, Tel Aviv was hit by terrorists with British passports in 2003. If you have a bad dog as a pet and it bites your friends, you can choose to put it down or continue to risk that your family will be harmed.
Canada has had the feral mutt around too long.
"What I have never understood is the idea that terrorist bombings since 9/11 is 'retribution'.."
May I take a shot at the answer to this one?
It's called killing with kindness. We rewarded their bad behaviour -- and continue to do so - see how much money the Pali's got from G8.
Who knew?
Disregard the whole article posted here. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. Go to the main site at Canada Free Press and read it. Otherwise, poor Klaus will be beaten. And puppies killed. Oh well. Damage is done. Next time, though. *shake fist*
And yeah, he makes a good case, does't he?
"I noted with interest that the head of the Canadian Islamic Congress, Dr. Mohammad Elmasry who is a professor at Waterloo University condemned the London Bombings, yet in the same statement says hat he "hopes Canadian Muslims do not pay the guilty-by-association price". Thats a curious statement, considering that no Canadian Muslims have been harmed as a result of any terrorist acts anywhere. Elmasry must be a master of Goebbels-style propaganda to be able to turn an atrocity that happened in London into a fear of imagined attacks against Canadian Muslims. It positively reeks of narcissism. "
That's my favourite part.
Unfotunately, ideologically the Muslims are
like climbers roped together with no hold
on the mountain. When one of them falls, they
all fall.
There is no room for independent thought in
their worldview. Though many, if not most, of
them may not be inclined to violently run amuck,
they fundamentally must agree with those among
them who do so in the name of Allah.
The Muslim world never went through anything
like the Enlightenment that took place in the
West. They have no mechanism for Reason and Faith
to coexist.
What can they say in the face of such savage
behavior as we've just seen? The most they can
come up with is the schoolyard defense that
"you're just as bad as we are". Objectively
that's not true but what else can they say?
They can't say killing people in the name of
Allah is wrong if fundamentally they believe
it's right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.