Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Robert Redford Bemoans 'Celebrity Oriented' Press - ("deep similarities between Bush & Nixon!")
NEWSMAX.COM ^ | JULY 6, 2005 | JAMES HIRSEN

Posted on 07/06/2005 4:43:25 PM PDT by CHARLITE

Thanks to the adoring press, Robert Redford recently got to remind the world that he's not a reporter but played one in a film.

Redford, of course, was in the flick "All the President's Men," which co-starred Dustin Hoffman.

While receiving a lifetime achievement award at the Czech Film Festival, the Sundance CEO remarked: "There are deep similarities going on, but where is the press? Where is the press?"

The actor was chiding the news media for not pursuing a sequel to the investigation of Richard Nixon by launching a probe of President George W. Bush.

"There are strong similarities to what is going on, stonewalling, not telling the truth, getting people under wiretaps," Redford repeated to reporters.

Commenting on the Iraq war, Redford claimed that the U.S. public continues "to be told things that are not true and what worries me is that we have these brave young American guys risking their lives every day."

Watergate is in the headlines once again because "Deep Throat" has revealed himself to be Mark Felt, former No. 2 at the FBI.

So who better to ruminate about investigations than the Sundancer?

Redford went on to ponder the lack of investigative journalism these days. "The media have changed, we see the ethics have changed," he horse-whispered.

And he griped about how "the press is more, I am sorry to say, celebrity oriented."

The Left Coast Report points out that if the press weren't "celebrity oriented," Redford's deep thoughts would be confined to his private commode.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: award; bush; filmmaking; nixon; opinions; politics; robertredford; sundance
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
"Redford went on to ponder the lack of investigative journalism these days. "The media have changed, we see the ethics have changed," he horse-whispered."

Hunh? The press today is less ethical than EVER. I'd love to hear Redford's "educated" views on Dan Blatherer and MemoGate.......and if Redford bemoans the "decline" of investigative journalism, then some bright young journalists should start in on the Clintons' use and abuse of the Justice Dept, the IRS and the FBI....just for starters.

1 posted on 07/06/2005 4:43:27 PM PDT by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

And he really doesn't understand the irony of his remarks.


2 posted on 07/06/2005 4:44:27 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Redford has an IQ of what . . . 99?


3 posted on 07/06/2005 4:44:54 PM PDT by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

i love it when the press believe actors are as knowledgeable as the parts they play


4 posted on 07/06/2005 4:46:51 PM PDT by InvisibleChurch (Life is full of choices, but you never get any.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

The fact that he fails to see the irony in his statement only reinforces his point. What kind of media would pay attention to what an idiot like Redford has to say?


5 posted on 07/06/2005 4:47:21 PM PDT by Moral Hazard (I question the bargaining power of the Union of the Snake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Bob ain't the sharpest knife in the drawer, is he? I can think of a couple of similarities between Nixon and a successor named Clinton, including FBI files in the wrong hands. Don't recall him speaking up on that one.


6 posted on 07/06/2005 4:48:30 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Redford is an expert on NOTHING-- and especially not about aging gracefully and well.


7 posted on 07/06/2005 4:49:19 PM PDT by Fudd Fan (fiat voluntas Tua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
...Where is the press?"

Look down, Bobby, they're humping your leg.

8 posted on 07/06/2005 4:49:36 PM PDT by TADSLOS (Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

You must have read it upside down.


9 posted on 07/06/2005 4:51:26 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
It is exclusively conservatives who disrespect celebrities. Liberals love them.
10 posted on 07/06/2005 4:51:36 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

TOO high!!


11 posted on 07/06/2005 4:55:47 PM PDT by handy old one (It is unbecoming for young men to utter maxims. Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

Well the problem was that Nixon was a piker when it comes to the likes of Clinton. Colsen had one FBI file and went to prison for three years (approximately). Clinton's crew had nearly 1000, possibly as high as 3000. No problem there...

Colson was at least a White House Staff member. Clinton's FBI files were accessable by interns.


12 posted on 07/06/2005 4:57:12 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Redford proves again how the stupid ultra left, no brain, stars are so absolutely out of touch with reality.


13 posted on 07/06/2005 4:57:23 PM PDT by Oldsailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch
"I love it when the press believe actors are as knowledgeable as the parts they play."

Exactly. Celebrities opining on foreign affairs, diplomacy, and all other areas of government and international politics only prove their appalling....and actually laughable......IGNORANCE!

About 6 months ago, someone did a study on the academic credentials of the biggest mouths in Follywood, and the entire long list could only boast one college degree - Susan Sarandon, who received a B.A. in "theater arts" from some college.

Thanks for your excellent remark, InvisibleChurch.

Char :)

14 posted on 07/06/2005 4:57:40 PM PDT by CHARLITE (I propose a co-Clinton team as permanent reps to Pyonyang, w/out possibility of repatriation....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
The Left Coast Report points out that if the press weren't "celebrity oriented," Redford's deep thoughts would be confined to his private commode.


15 posted on 07/06/2005 5:00:09 PM PDT by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Funny to see freepers such as yourself who will badmouth a liberal simply bc he/she has a degree in *any* of the liberal arts, yet praise someone like Tom Selleck, Kelsey Grammer, James Woods, or Bruce Willis with similar degrees.


16 posted on 07/06/2005 5:03:37 PM PDT by Windsong (FighterPilot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Ah, Nixon.. there was a president who was severely under-rated. Nixon was under-rated and demonized, while the hippies of his generation have been over-rated and overly praised. :o(


17 posted on 07/06/2005 5:03:43 PM PDT by Sally II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Deep simularities between Redford and foot stool.


18 posted on 07/06/2005 5:08:34 PM PDT by DOGEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Hey, Bobby! When are you moving to Ireland?

On another note, I heard a rumor that when Redford read the script for "The Way We Were" and saw that he would be required to do a love scene with Barbra Streisand he contacted his agent and told him to ask for more money.


19 posted on 07/06/2005 5:13:26 PM PDT by billnaz (What part of "shall not be infringed" don't you understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

99 is much too high! How about 65?


20 posted on 07/06/2005 5:15:59 PM PDT by foofoopowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson