Skip to comments.
Fierce Defender of President to Lead Campaign for Court [Ed Gillespie]
New York Times ^
| July 6, 2005
| Elisabteh Bumiller
Posted on 07/06/2005 2:18:36 PM PDT by West Coast Conservative
Ed Gillespie was called "President Bush's pit bull" during the 2004 presidential campaign, when as chairman of the Republican National Committee he seemed to live on cable television trading snarls with Terry McAuliffe, his attack dog of a counterpart at the Democratic National Committee.
So Mr. Gillespie, 43, might seem a strange choice to manage the expected fight in the Senate over who will replace Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, since the job will include delivering moderate Democratic votes for whomever Mr. Bush selects as a Supreme Court nominee.
But Republicans said that White House officials turned to Mr. Gillespie as their battle commander for two reasons: his organizational skills in managing the chaos of a political campaign and, hot television rhetoric aside, his longtime ties across the aisle.
"As soon as the camera lights went off, we'd have a lot of conversation," Mr. McAuliffe recalled on Tuesday. "We're both strong Catholics, we both have a lot of kids, we spent a lot of time talking about our kids. We get along great. For two years, I spent more time with Ed than I spent with my wife."
Other Democrats were less convinced of Mr. Gillespie's merits and his suitability for the job. "To choose the former head of the Republican Party who's known for slash-and-burn tactics doesn't help," said Senator Charles E. Schumer, a New York Democrat who is a member of the Judiciary Committee.
Mr. Gillespie, who has seldom, if ever, been at a loss for words, was returning from a long Fourth of July weekend on the Jersey Shore on Tuesday and declined to be interviewed for this article. Republicans said that Mr. Gillespie was unwilling to discuss his role because his responsibilities have not yet been finalized.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; gillespie; rnc; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
To: West Coast Conservative
Good pick by the President. Between him and Fred Thompson the candidate(s) should be in very capable hands.
2
posted on
07/06/2005 2:20:15 PM PDT
by
babaloo
To: West Coast Conservative
Interesting. Looks like the GOP is going to take this seriously. Reading in between the lines, I would say this may be an indicator that Bush is not going to go for a safe milque toast of a nominee.
3
posted on
07/06/2005 2:22:24 PM PDT
by
Michael.SF.
("Rommel, you magnificent son of bitch.....I READ YOUR BOOK!! - Gen. Patton)
To: West Coast Conservative
Outstanding -- Gillespie and Fred Thompson -- looking better and better and now waiting for Howard Dean to throw his hissy fit!
4
posted on
07/06/2005 2:23:17 PM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
(AOII Mom -- J.C. for OK Governor in '06; Allen/Watts in 2008)
To: babaloo
Hardly. After all, it was Fred Thompson who took the lead on impeachment in the Senate. And look what a good job he did with that.
To: Michael.SF.
6
posted on
07/06/2005 2:24:27 PM PDT
by
ConservativeMan55
(DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)
To: West Coast Conservative
"To choose the former head of the Republican Party who's known for slash-and-burn tactics doesn't help," said Senator Charles E. Schumer Chucky, you chose the Gutter. Now Get Ready to Rumble!
7
posted on
07/06/2005 2:24:38 PM PDT
by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: West Coast Conservative
"To choose the former head of the Republican Party who's known for slash-and-burn tactics doesn't help," said Senator Charles E. Schumer
This from the jackass heard saying on a cell phone before the nominee is even known that this will be a nuclear war or some such nonsense.
8
posted on
07/06/2005 2:28:25 PM PDT
by
Arkie2
(No, I never voted for Bill Clinton. I don't plan on voting Republican again!)
To: MarcusTulliusCicero
It's kind of hard to blame Fred for that mess since more than a few Senate Republicans stated publicly that the eveidence didn't matter.
9
posted on
07/06/2005 2:29:49 PM PDT
by
Arkie2
(No, I never voted for Bill Clinton. I don't plan on voting Republican again!)
To: West Coast Conservative
To: West Coast Conservative
"As soon as the camera lights went off, we'd have a lot of conversation," Mr. McAuliffe recalled on Tuesday. "We're both strong Catholics, we both have a lot of kids, we spent a lot of time talking about our kids. We get along great. For two years, I spent more time with Ed than I spent with my wife." W.T.M.I.!!!!
11
posted on
07/06/2005 2:30:42 PM PDT
by
Christian4Bush
(The modern Democratic Party: Attacking our defenders and defending our attackers.)
To: West Coast Conservative
Does the %&^$@ Main Street Losers (i.e., Press) have to quote Chuckie Schumer on everything? Does his staff call the press constantly with quotes or does the press have its nose permanently stuck to his backside?
I don't know which is a bigger embarrassment: Schumer or the Presstitutes.
12
posted on
07/06/2005 2:32:17 PM PDT
by
jigsaw
(Liberalism: Hooked on Fraud)
To: Arkie2
True enough but Thompson was obviously just going through the motions.....perhaps he was already in negotiation to be the token conservative on Law and Order?
To: MarcusTulliusCicero
LOL! He's a pretty good actor. Don't know if he was better on the big screen or C-Span.
14
posted on
07/06/2005 2:36:25 PM PDT
by
Arkie2
(No, I never voted for Bill Clinton. I don't plan on voting Republican again!)
To: jigsaw
" does the press have its nose permanently stuck to his backside?"
THAT is NOT a pretty picture...
To: West Coast Conservative
Then there's Mark Racicot, Montana Governor who could be added to that team!
16
posted on
07/06/2005 2:43:34 PM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(Linguine Spined Republican Senators Will Lose Their Majority!)
To: PhiKapMom
Amazingly the Rats have already made several missteps that will come back to bite them if played properly. Biden's comment that the SC makes law was Christmas in July. Now Schumer's going to war statement. This has the potential to not go at all well for the Dems if the Republicans play it right.
This group just aren't as smooth as Slick. Makes you wonder just who is in charge now.
17
posted on
07/06/2005 2:48:18 PM PDT
by
gov_bean_ counter
(Conservatives look at Iraqi dual use chemicals and see WMDs. Liberals see tomato gardens.)
To: West Coast Conservative
They got Fred Thompson as well. Good man. His narration at the GOP convention was pure magic. I'll put Ed and Fred up against the banshees of the left any day of the week.
I 'spose it is time for someone to post the popcorn gif with EXTRA butter.
Off to church to do some Wednesday night Prayin'
To: Truth Table; cardinal4
McAuliffe is a "strong Catholic?" The god at whose altar he worships is the uber-abortionst, William Jefferson Clinton.
19
posted on
07/06/2005 3:15:21 PM PDT
by
Ax
(Patriotism is as Patriotism does.)
To: PhiKapMom
Yes. Better and better. This probably means without a doubt that Attorney General G WILL NOT get the nod...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson