Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Talk of brainstorming 'may offend epileptics
Telegraph ^ | 7/3/05 | Liz Lightfoot

Posted on 07/03/2005 7:04:19 AM PDT by paltz

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: paltz

See? They look for reasons to fret and worry. Typical lefty PC crappola. "Let's make it a problem before it becomes one!" I'm so entirely sick of their pessimism, anxiety, and depression. They want everybody to be miserable like they are. Argh!!


41 posted on 07/03/2005 8:14:45 AM PDT by AmericanChef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz

Any mention of brain offends the liberal left.


42 posted on 07/03/2005 8:17:18 AM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (Activist liberal Judges, have turned the SCOTUS into a malignancy, devouring the US Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz

No one is an "epileptic". Some people have epilepsy, or acquire epilepsy. First thing to remember is that you are not immune.


43 posted on 07/03/2005 8:22:39 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (LET ME DIE ON MY FEET IN MY SWAMP, ALEX KOZINSKI FOR SCOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob

""Arn't people with epilepsy supposed to be on some island in the Pacific? "

Just curious, if people with leprosy are lepers, then why aren't people with epilepsy called epilepers? :)


44 posted on 07/03/2005 8:26:40 AM PDT by msjhall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: paltz

45 posted on 07/03/2005 8:31:59 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #46 Removed by Moderator

To: paltz
People found it more offensive that the question was being asked of them, she said.

Those selfish epileptic people need to be more sensitive to the needs of smarmy, self-righteous NEA busybodies.

47 posted on 07/03/2005 8:41:58 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws spawned the runaway federal health care monopoly and fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob; All
I wouldn't necessarilly categorize your remark as non-pc. I would, however, consider it a symptom of terminal assholeitis.
As someone who experiences non-epilepsy related seizures, is about as offensive as the term "salad bar".
48 posted on 07/03/2005 8:49:21 AM PDT by olde north church (Why shop with the Son when the Father's place is still open for business?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: paltz

The offendee is probably somebody without much of a brain, period. Hard to have a "brainstorm" without one.


49 posted on 07/03/2005 8:51:30 AM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz

If you really want to offend an epileptic, flash a strobe light in their face.


50 posted on 07/03/2005 8:57:04 AM PDT by Mad Mammoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beckaz

If it was a tongue and cheek satire story...I would have added the humor key word. Unfortunately, this ridiculous story is true and we can indeed laugh at these british liberals. As an epileptic myelf, I never even connected the word brainstorming to epilepsy until I first read this. These idiots overthought the idea that during a seizure there is an "electrical storm" of sorts going on in the brain. It's almost like a short circuit. Leave it to liberals to find ways to make people feel offended.


51 posted on 07/03/2005 9:01:25 AM PDT by paltz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: paltz

It is probably the same UK crowd that is trying to get the word "couch potato" replaced as it offends vegetarians.

July 1, 2005

"Weird TV news of the day: British farmers are protesting - and I mean really protesting, with signs and everything - the use of the word "couch potato." They think it makes the potato seem like an "unhealthy" food. They held the protest in Oxford, England, because the protestors had written a letter to the Oxford English Dictionary asking that they reconsider their listing of the word and the definition they used: "a person who spends leisure time passively or idly sitting around, especially watching television or video tapes." They want the term taken out and replaced with the term "couch slouch." "


52 posted on 07/03/2005 9:18:49 AM PDT by bwteim (=Begin With The End In Mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: olde north church

I also have seizures and I thought it was funny.


53 posted on 07/03/2005 9:19:46 AM PDT by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: paltz

I am deeply offended that someone seems to believe the term "brainstorm" offends me.


54 posted on 07/03/2005 9:20:08 AM PDT by SaveTheChief (There are 10 types of people -- those who understand binary, and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

It's honestly not an insult to call a person with epilepsy, an epileptic-a person with diabetes a diabetic-a person with arthritis an arthritic-a sightless person blind-a non-hearing person deaf-a voiceless person mute, etc., etc., and is seldom taken as an insult by the victems of those conditions.

It's just that the paranoid homosexuals who demand we call them gays,the liberal Democrats who insist we call them progressives,the pro-abortionists who demand we call them pro-choice,the pro-terrorists who demand we call them enlightened patriots, the MSM that demands we call them unbiased, dark hued Americans who demand we call them Latinos, darker hued Americans who demand we call them African-Americans;are all so busy inventing and inviting so many new victems into their kookamania version of victemhood, that they failed to notice that their supply of
aleged victimizers, have become so much more of a minority than their accusers that one need not wind up waist deep in liberal bull feces to recognize it for what it is.


55 posted on 07/03/2005 9:21:09 AM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (Activist liberal Judges, have turned the SCOTUS into a malignancy, devouring the US Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: pepperdog
People are starving in N. Korea and Africa. Child predators are roaming the streets of our country. Cancer is epidemic. Our schools are rotten and our Universities are worse than rotten. Our rights are disappearing at an exponential rate. And we should worry about a phrase that has been around for as long as I can remember?

Yes, and we should do what the rock stars say and throw our money down the sinkholes of ridiculous causes.

56 posted on 07/03/2005 9:22:44 AM PDT by SaveTheChief (There are 10 types of people -- those who understand binary, and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SaveTheChief

If the Rock Stars were true to their convictions they would put their own money where they want their dumbass fans to put their's , until the entertainers had no more left after the donation than does their fan's after they donate. The entertainers would still have been less generous than their fans, because the fan's will work for weeks to earn back their donation, while the star will almost instantly be repaid from royalties, if they never work again.


57 posted on 07/03/2005 9:46:21 AM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (Activist liberal Judges, have turned the SCOTUS into a malignancy, devouring the US Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell

I had a crash on my bike when I was 11, beginning 22 years of intermittent siezures. I was one of the lucky ones, the damage eventually healed. I never had a decent job I did not have to lie to get, got turned down for dates in high school, it was not an easy time. I just figure that my life never got a start, until I was well past 30 years old.
It is a different situation, I suppose you have to be there to understand.


58 posted on 07/03/2005 9:47:47 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (LET ME DIE ON MY FEET IN MY SWAMP, ALEX KOZINSKI FOR SCOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell

Question: Must one have rocks in one's head to be a Rock Star??


59 posted on 07/03/2005 9:50:46 AM PDT by pepperdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: paltz
Talk of brainstorming 'may offend epileptics'

Oh for heaven's sake, this country is is trouble.

As soon as I thought I'd seen it all, PeeCee reaches a new low.
60 posted on 07/03/2005 12:00:53 PM PDT by Sweet_Sunflower29 (My poor cat has a broken leg.... and a huge cast. <^..^>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson