Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fox News reporting that Sandra Day O'Connor retiring!
Fox News | 7/1/05 | SueRae

Posted on 07/01/2005 7:14:03 AM PDT by SueRae

Hearing on Fox News


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS: 1down6togo; filibustertime; herewego; oconnor; retirement; sandradayoconnor; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 1,281-1,297 next last
To: Gipper08
We have to nominate a true conservative anyway.

It will be interesting to see who Bush nominates. But an originalist will not get on. This will be the real test of the deal cut by the seven on filibusters.

281 posted on 07/01/2005 7:48:16 AM PDT by SittinYonder (America is the Last Beach)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: samantha
Judges should be neither conservative, nor liberal. They should be impartial, with the Constitution always as their guide.
282 posted on 07/01/2005 7:48:17 AM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

No, in the case of a tie, the lower-court ruling stands...


283 posted on 07/01/2005 7:48:22 AM PDT by joey9004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Shaq ONeal

Sure Bork, Olson, Kratuhammer, Ashcroft


284 posted on 07/01/2005 7:49:00 AM PDT by FROGTOWN CONSERVATIVE (In God we trust, In Liberals we don't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: sure_fine

It will be interesting to watch McCain's "party" vote.


285 posted on 07/01/2005 7:49:01 AM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

I say TED NUGENT should replace her.


286 posted on 07/01/2005 7:49:10 AM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
I'm definitely looking forward to the fight, no one with the slightest interest in politics or the future of this country couldn't be. I'm just very nervous about putting the fate of the court and by extension the nation in the hands of the weak sisters in the Republican ranks.

If Frist can't control the rampaging Rinos over something as innocuous as a circuit court judge, what chance does he have in riding herd on them when every stop is out and anything goes on the left? I fully expect the slimy seven to stand shoulder to shoulder with their allies on the left and obstruct anyone the president nominates to the right of Michael Moore

4-4 decisions on the SC isn't the worst thing that could happen if there fight is drawn out. Much worse is what happens if the leftists manage to brow beat the president into putting up a Howard Dean clone just to fill an empty slot.

It's going to be an interesting summer to say the least.
287 posted on 07/01/2005 7:49:19 AM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg (Children's classic songs updated for Islam "If you're happy and you know it, Go Kaboom!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder

If we can't get a conservative on there , we should not nominate anyone.


288 posted on 07/01/2005 7:49:27 AM PDT by Gipper08 (Mike Pence in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: over3Owithabrain

Are you even reading my replies? You just admitted what I stated! Good grief. I stated you have an interest in bashing 41 and without RECORD stating 43 is just like him, but ignore Reagan's appointments. I stated you evidently had an agenda, and I'm correct.

Reagan gave us two Justices that ruled against the Ten Commandments and eminent domain.

I'm "shooting the messenger" because you are basing you opinions on Bush on nothing but your "feelings". You cannot point to an instance he has caved on the Judiciary. I am "shooting the messanger" because you seem content to ignore another Republican President's contributions to the court's balance.

Nevermind. Slime them as you wish. But it's evident what your agenda is.


289 posted on 07/01/2005 7:49:40 AM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: CitizenM
I have a strange proposal: Appoint Hillary.

Your kidding right?

I'm not THAT afraid of her. A lifetime appt on the Supremes is more powerful than the Prez for a limited time.

Please rethink your strange idea.

290 posted on 07/01/2005 7:49:58 AM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Minuteman at heart, couch potato in reality))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething

Have you heard any more about the Senate floating a plan that Bush nominate one among them to replace O'Connor?


291 posted on 07/01/2005 7:49:58 AM PDT by SittinYonder (America is the Last Beach)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: Altair333
We don't need conservatives. We need constructionists.

Don't abet the media in destroying this distinction.

292 posted on 07/01/2005 7:50:12 AM PDT by Chunga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Dansong
The Liberal Press: President Bush will likely choose from a host of wack-job, constitutionalist, America-loving, law-specialists. That just CANNOT be.

What will the rest of the world think of us? Open-minded, for-the-common-good justices are what this nation needs to kiss-up to the rest of the planet.

293 posted on 07/01/2005 7:50:16 AM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: daler
absolutely! The media can feign surprise at this, they want a story to over-hype. (but like i said, Kristol predicted this last week). I agree with you President Bush was not caught off guard. I'm sure he's had his separate picks for either Rhenquist or O'Connor, lined up for a long, long, time.
294 posted on 07/01/2005 7:50:25 AM PDT by YaYa123 (@I Will Support President Bush on his Supreme Court nominees.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

Ann Coulter for the Supreme Court!


295 posted on 07/01/2005 7:50:28 AM PDT by Jenya (Terrorism. Bush gets it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw

I second that


296 posted on 07/01/2005 7:50:45 AM PDT by MassachusettsGOP (Massachusetts Republican....A rare breed indeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
LOL!! That's "Post of the Day" material.

If there's a cash prize involved with "Post of the Day," I whole-heartedly accept your nomination.


297 posted on 07/01/2005 7:50:46 AM PDT by Libertarian444
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: FROGTOWN CONSERVATIVE
GWB to start taking out the baseball bat

Shades of the debate... "Lumber company... heh heh... Need some wood?"

298 posted on 07/01/2005 7:50:57 AM PDT by johnb838 (Adios, liberal mofos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: SueRae
I have just the replacement:

Michael M. Bates: My Side of the Swamp

299 posted on 07/01/2005 7:51:01 AM PDT by Mike Bates (Irish Alzheimer's victim: I only remember the grudges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shaq ONeal

If Bush really wanted to play Hardball..... he'd make a recess appointment over the July 4th holidays. And appoint Newt.


300 posted on 07/01/2005 7:51:03 AM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 1,281-1,297 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson