[Gipper08]

If we can't get a conservative on there , we should not nominate anyone.

[SittinYonder]

If we can't get a conservative on there , we should not nominate anyone.

The problem is, it's not "we" who will be making the nomination and fighting the fight. It's Bush and his "new tone" and the spineless wimps in the Senate. "We" would probably be all right, but there needs to be a Constitutional amendment allowing some delegation of Freepers to nominate and then fight for approval of Supreme Court Justices.

[conservaDave]

How about recess appointment for Bork until we get a good conservative in there.

[PhiKapMom]

I want someone that rules on the law not makes it up as they go along. After seeing comments on here in recent weeks by conservatives that don't like a ruling and want an activist court, I want a constructionist nominated -- one who construes a legal document (as the U.S. Constitution) in a specific way (from Webster's)