Are you even reading my replies? You just admitted what I stated! Good grief. I stated you have an interest in bashing 41 and without RECORD stating 43 is just like him, but ignore Reagan's appointments. I stated you evidently had an agenda, and I'm correct.
Reagan gave us two Justices that ruled against the Ten Commandments and eminent domain.
I'm "shooting the messenger" because you are basing you opinions on Bush on nothing but your "feelings". You cannot point to an instance he has caved on the Judiciary. I am "shooting the messanger" because you seem content to ignore another Republican President's contributions to the court's balance.
Nevermind. Slime them as you wish. But it's evident what your agenda is.
Souter is consistently far worse than anyone Reagan gave us. If you love Bush 1, fine. But don't say my criticism of him is without merit. Many many conservatives are sorely disappointed in him, hence his pathetic 38 percent in 1992. His son has been better to conservatives in some ways, but I say again, he and the Senate WILL cave. Hell, they can't even sell a Bolton or an Estrada to lesser positions. Talk is cheap, rhetoric is useless. Watch the results. I bet you were one of the ones here citing "strategery" during the CFR debacle, mocking those of us who knew what would happen.