Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reid suggests Republican lawmakers for high court (How nice of him...)
Reuters ^ | June 28, 2005 | Thomas Ferraro

Posted on 06/28/2005 4:05:40 PM PDT by RWR8189

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid suggested on Tuesday that four of his Republican colleagues be considered by President Bush if a vacancy occurs on the U.S. Supreme Court.

Seeking a possible consensus nominee, Reid recommended Republican Sens. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Mel Martinez of Florida, Mike DeWine of Ohio and Mike Crapo of Idaho.

Reid described them all as bright and able lawyers who would be strong additions to the nation's highest court.

"We have had approximately 10 members of the Supreme Court that came from the United States Senate over the years," Reid told reporters.

"There are people who serve in the Senate now who are Republicans who I think would be outstanding Supreme Court members," Reid said.

There had been widespread speculation that a resignation could come soon on the Supreme Court. But uncertainty rose on Monday when the court ended its term for the year without any announced departures.

Still, court observers say there could be a resignation on the aging federal bench in the days, weeks or months ahead.

Reid, who has conferred with Senate Republican leader Bill Frist on the possibility of a Supreme Court opening, said he has made his suggestions to "anyone who will listen."

Reid and fellow Democrats have urged Bush to consult with them before making a nomination, which the Senate would then be asked to confirm.

Earlier on Tuesday, Frist said, "I've made some suggestions" to the White House on potential nominees, but declined to disclose names.

"They are reaching out for suggestions," Frist said after giving a speech at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative group. He added, "I don't have any inside information" about who the nominee could be.

Another senator who has been mentioned as a possible Supreme Court nominee is Republican John Cornyn of Texas, a former member of the Texas Supreme Court and the only senator with appellate court experience.

Asked if Bush should consider Cornyn, Reid shrugged and said, "I've told you (the ones) I think he should consider."

Graham and DeWine were among seven Senate Republicans who joined seven Senate Democrats in reaching a compromise last month on Bush's most contentious appeals court nominees.

The accord cleared the way for the confirmation of a number of Bush's nominees, but preserved the right of Democrats to block others "under extraordinary circumstances."

Cornyn was among those who have criticized the accord, which could face a major test with a Supreme Court nomination.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: crapo; dewine; graham; harryreid; lindseygraham; martinez; melmartinez; mikecrapo; mikedewine; reid; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
I'm sure the President will take your suggestions to heart....
1 posted on 06/28/2005 4:05:41 PM PDT by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

BWHAHAHAHA!!! There's not a single SCOTUS material amongst that group. He really DOES take Republicans as fools.


2 posted on 06/28/2005 4:08:15 PM PDT by small voice in the wilderness (Quick, act casual. If they sense scorn and ridicule, they'll flee..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Reid just can't understand what GWB means by "no consultation" on judges. Dingy, STHU


3 posted on 06/28/2005 4:09:12 PM PDT by Fudd Fan (George Allen will decimate Hitlery in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Of COURSE, he suggested those Republicans...I don't know that much about Crapo...but the other ones surely would please the dems...

Which means, not no, but heck no!!!

Cornyn, though, would be great!!!


4 posted on 06/28/2005 4:09:32 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

What an idiot. I hope Rove & Co. have some plans to drive Reid totally off his rocker...


5 posted on 06/28/2005 4:10:02 PM PDT by eureka! (It will not be safe to vote Democrat for a long, long, time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

The boob DeWine was just stabbed in the back. As has been noted by scores of FReepers, anyone who has the political tin ear that DeWine has should not be in the Senate. Is Kasich listening?


6 posted on 06/28/2005 4:10:14 PM PDT by gaspar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Pound sand, Harry, you lying weasel SOB. We won, we get our judges.


7 posted on 06/28/2005 4:11:08 PM PDT by doug from upland (MOCKING DEMOCRATS 24/7 --- www.rightwingparodies.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

I'm surprised Arlen Specter didn't get a mention...


8 posted on 06/28/2005 4:11:09 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher (The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

John Kyl would be a perfect cheif justice of the supreme court a great conservative of course reid didn't suggest him.

I wish one of the peanut gallery had asked reid about Kyl and shown how much of an obstructionist reid is because Kyl is a brilliant conservative that would be a strict constitutionalist.

Dewine-Laughable

Lindsay Graham republican during the day democrat at night=Laughable

Crepo don't know enough about

Martinez would be weak on immigration, enviornment, and affirmative action issues. Martinez was very moderate before he ran for the senate I think as a judge he would veer to the left.

Schumer mentioned Spector too which is laughable.


Too bad the governor of arizona is a democrat or if I was Bush I would have nominated Kyl and let them reject one of their own.


9 posted on 06/28/2005 4:11:27 PM PDT by johnmecainrino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

All lightweights....and unqualified. Just proves that Reid doesn't know how to judge judges....and has no business second-guessing the President's nominees.


10 posted on 06/28/2005 4:11:32 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

As it happens, John Bolton has a law degree.


11 posted on 06/28/2005 4:11:33 PM PDT by RichInOC (The U.N. needs an enema...and John Bolton's holding the firehose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Not being on Harry's list qualifies as extreme?...NOT


12 posted on 06/28/2005 4:11:36 PM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Aren't Souter and Kennedy both what we got listening to Dems?


13 posted on 06/28/2005 4:12:12 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

They actually have the nerve to state in the article that Reid's motive is to seek a consensus choice. When is someone going to stand up to these communists and shove their nonsense back at them? To anyone but a two year old and a left wing journalist, that obviously was not the motive.


14 posted on 06/28/2005 4:12:28 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
I nominate Jerry Smith, appointed by Reagan to the 5th Circuit.

15. In a span of just over two months in 1996, you (Jerry Smith) issued two blockbuster opinions: Hopwood v. Texas, 78 F.3d 932 (5th Cir. 1996) (holding that the University of Texas Law School could not use racial preferences in deciding which students to admit); and Castano v. American Tobacco Co., 84 F.3d 734 (5th Cir. 1996) (decertifying the largest class action ever attempted in federal court). What single opinion of yours -- majority, concurring, dissenting, or other -- do you find to be the most memorable?

Hopwood.

16. How do you define the term "judicial activism," and is it ever proper for a federal appellate judge to consider his or her personal preference as to the outcome of a case (other than the preference to decide the case correctly in accordance with the law) in deciding how to rule?

Judicial activism could mean many things, but primarily it is the substitution of the court's view for the policymaker's view, in cases where the decision properly should rest with the policymaker, or substituting the court's view for what the Constitution says, where a constitutional provision is at stake. A judge should not consider his or her personal preference as to outcome, any more than an umpire should call balls and strikes based on which team is his or her favorite.

15 posted on 06/28/2005 4:16:50 PM PDT by bayourod (Unless we get 40% of the Hispanic vote in 2008, President Hillary will take all your guns away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Bush needs to start a rumor he is nominating John Ashcroft. I figure at least 10 dims would have heart failure opening up some more seats.
16 posted on 06/28/2005 4:18:17 PM PDT by mouser (run the rats out its the only hope we have)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Here's a suggestion for Harry Reid:


17 posted on 06/28/2005 4:19:13 PM PDT by andy58-in-nh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mouser
"Bush needs to start a rumor he is nominating John Ashcroft. I figure at least 10 dims would have heart failure opening up some more seats."

Why make it just a rumor? He clearly has the background, having served 4 years as attorney general. And Senator Carnahan wouldn't be around to vote against him.
18 posted on 06/28/2005 4:23:09 PM PDT by Moral Hazard (...but when push comes to shove, you've got to do what you love, even if it's not a good idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Actually, Mel Martinez is a good guy and quite conservative. I think he's going to make a really good Senator (this is his first term). However, he's not Supreme Court material.

But if I were Mel, I'd be insulted to be included in any list with Lindsey Graham.


19 posted on 06/28/2005 4:26:01 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Dear Harry,

Thanks for the input, but I already have a few good 'ol boys (maybe girls!) in mind. I'm sure you will absolutely flip over the names on my list!

Say "hi" to Howeird for me.

GWB

20 posted on 06/28/2005 4:27:38 PM PDT by LasVegasMac ("God. Guts. Guns. I don't call 911." (bumper sticker))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson