Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hi-tech SAS troops take on Taliban
Times Online (UK) ^ | 6/26/2005 | Michael Smith

Posted on 06/25/2005 7:46:44 PM PDT by 1066AD

June 26, 2005

Hi-tech SAS troops take on Taliban Michael Smith

UP TO two squadrons of British special forces are preparing to go to Afghanistan within weeks to provide the reconnaissance for an expected British deployment of more than 5,000 troops.

The men from the SAS and the new Special Reconnaissance Regiment (SRR) will form a combined joint taskforce with members of the Australian SAS, according to senior defence sources. A company of British paratroopers will provide backup.

The British special forces of about 120 men will be based in the southern province of Kandahar ahead of a 5,500-strong infantry battle group expected to be sent early next year. There are currently 1,100 British troops in Afghanistan.

The British and Australian special forces will fan out across the territory to be covered by the British battle group. They will identify the most serious threats in the region and gather intelligence on any Taliban activity.

The troops face a hostile environment, with Taliban fighters regrouping in southern Afghanistan backed up by members of Al-Qaeda, including specially trained suicide bombers.

Last week RAF Harriers based at Kandahar joined US aircraft in providing support to American and Afghan forces in clashes in which 132 Taliban fighters were reported killed.

During their operations the SAS troopers will be assisted by the improved intelligence provided by a squadron from the SRR, which was formed this year to help in the fight against international terrorism.

Special forces commanders were warned months ago that they should be ready for Afghanistan. Senior commanders prepared what one source last week described as demands for “new Gucci kit” — requests for the latest equipment to spy on and fight the enemy.

The equipment, bought as a result of lessons learnt from the first SAS deployment during the war in Afghanistan, includes a spy plane the size of a child’s glider.

The American-made drone is launched by hand, can reach heights of about 100ft and operates to a range of more than five miles.

The SRR intelligence operators also have lightweight signals equipment capable of picking up mobile phone and radio communications.

The British will also be taking so-called “fire-and-forget” electronic jammers that can be planted at various strategic points to provide blanket disruption of Taliban and Al-Qaeda communications.

The intelligence operators will have laptop computers linked to the larger US drones such as the Predator and Global Hawk and to American aerial reconnaissance satellites to download imagery of Taliban positions.

They are also expected to take a number of Supacat six-wheel, all-terrain vehicles, which have powerful turbocharged V8 diesel engines. The vehicles will be fitted with a grenade launcher that acts like a scatter gun, allowing the SAS to regain the initiative if they are ambushed by Taliban or Al-Qaeda fighters.

The composition of the battle group heading for Afghanistan has not yet been decided. Military commanders were hoping to send 19 Light Brigade, the new light infantry formation, to form the main British force. But Brigadier Chip Chapman, its commander, has said he does not believe it will be operational in time.

The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have led to a change in tactics for the SAS, which has traditionally worked in small patrols of four men. Teams now vary in size and some of the operations during the Afghan war were the largest mounted since the 1970s.


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; harriers; oef; sas; taleban; taliban
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 06/25/2005 7:46:44 PM PDT by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1066AD

Just, Wow.


2 posted on 06/25/2005 7:49:18 PM PDT by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Get'em fellas.


3 posted on 06/25/2005 7:51:48 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog; GVgirl; MadIvan
Those who dare, win.

Those who cross SAS, die.

4 posted on 06/25/2005 7:53:10 PM PDT by DCBryan1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD

Get some!


5 posted on 06/25/2005 7:54:19 PM PDT by SeeRushToldU_So (If you jog in a jogging suit, lounge in lounging pajamas,WHY would anyone want to wear a windbreaker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD

Uh oh!

Bad asses in transit...
Too bad we probably will hear no accounting of their "activity" while in country...

Worked with a few -- nearly 40 years ago, and I doubt they have gone wobbly in the knees in that time...

Semper Fi


6 posted on 06/25/2005 7:54:56 PM PDT by river rat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD
Hot Dog. I luv this $hite!!!

Why can't the NYSlime carry a story like this?

7 posted on 06/25/2005 7:56:41 PM PDT by bubman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1; Jeff Head; Travis McGee
The British special forces of about 120 men will be based in the southern province of Kandahar ahead of a 5,500-strong infantry battle group expected to be sent early next year. There are currently 1,100 British troops in Afghanistan

Am I just reading into this or is this prep for an excursion to the west of Afghanistan aka Iran ?

8 posted on 06/25/2005 7:57:01 PM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

Yes I wouldn't want to cross those lads..


9 posted on 06/25/2005 7:57:23 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dog

They might hit you with their purses.


10 posted on 06/25/2005 7:58:50 PM PDT by Modok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

You know I had heard of this move a while ago......and couldn't figure out why. I think the electios will be done....so that can't be it.


11 posted on 06/25/2005 7:59:47 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dog

That's a lot of troops.....hmmmmmmmmmmm ???

Bears watchin a while.

Stay safe !


12 posted on 06/25/2005 8:03:05 PM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Modok

Uh...I don't think that's what they mean by "Gucci kit", bubba.


13 posted on 06/25/2005 8:05:20 PM PDT by RedRover (No Conservative ever threw food at Maureen Dowd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD
Here's what the lads use to get around--the 6x6 Supacat:


14 posted on 06/25/2005 8:07:08 PM PDT by Pharmboy (There is no positive correlation between the ability to write, act, sing or dance and being right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

What in the hell is a Gucci? Is that a New York term for a bird with webbed feet and white feathers.


15 posted on 06/25/2005 8:13:45 PM PDT by Modok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

This is actually a "normal" rotation of NATO forces. It's the UK's turn to provide large numbers. And they rarely deploy without SAS to act as their lightning rod.
These guys are good as they come, and it's good to see them deployed too the south.


16 posted on 06/25/2005 8:18:53 PM PDT by ProudVet77 (NASCAR - Because it's the way Americans drive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

Isn't it interesting that the British government denies the SAS served in Vietnam.... We know differently!

Sort of the same as our government's denial we attacked the "dry & wet trail" in Laos or Cambodia, huh?

Semper Fi


17 posted on 06/25/2005 8:18:55 PM PDT by river rat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD

Have at it Gentlemen...

18 posted on 06/25/2005 8:20:02 PM PDT by Khurkris (Still raining.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Modok

Close enough!


19 posted on 06/25/2005 8:20:04 PM PDT by RedRover (Fight the Wussification of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD
“fire-and-forget”

How the WOT ought to be prosecuted.

20 posted on 06/25/2005 8:21:12 PM PDT by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson