Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Death of "Just Compensation"
Me | June 24, 2005 | UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

Posted on 06/24/2005 12:53:19 PM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

After the extinguishment of quaint 18th Century notions like "property rights" and "public use" by the Supreme Court, "Just compensation" is not only the next thing to go from the Constitution, it is already effectively dead in consequence of this SC decision. It should not take an Alan Greenspan to figure this out.

The value of a piece of property is based on supply, demand and location, location and location in free and fair open market bidding. Demand for urban real estate in particular comes from competition among real estate investors and individual homeowners. But if developers and investors can acquire properties through government emminent domain action and no longer have to entice owners to sell by bidding up prices, then they are effectively eliminated from the demand side of the classic economic equation and the value of moderate urban single-family residences and small businesses will be determined entirely by sales between individuals on the residential market. So-called "just compensation" based on that market value will decline from present levels accordingly.

Beyond that, locations which were an advantage to homeowners are now a disadvantage. The closer one is to large developments, the more likely it is to be condemned for adjacent development. Being close to shopping and other services has been an enhancement to home values. But who is going to pay a high price to live in, maintain and improve a house whose condemnation is only a matter of time and whose investment value for sale to a developer is nil? At the same time, property taxes will have to rise as a percentage of valuation to stay even, driving more residents out even in advance of the bulldozers.

I can see as this settles in that formerly valuable urban real estate would decline almost to the level of rural acreage.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: eminentdomain; emminentdomain

1 posted on 06/24/2005 12:53:20 PM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

I'd be against this if I was a developer too....what's to stop the city or redevelopment district or Whatever from condemning your development?


2 posted on 06/24/2005 12:56:21 PM PDT by A Balrog of Morgoth (With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the RINOs in terror before me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

The type of redevelopment agency condemnations that were sanctioned by the Supreme Court this week have been going on around the country for years. I've had problems with it myself, but the Court was really confirming the status quo. I don't think your observations about the effect on property values is valid.


3 posted on 06/24/2005 12:59:56 PM PDT by B.Bumbleberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

Real estate profits are essentially reserved for developers and investors who can sell shopping malls, office buildings and condominiums to each other and charge confiscatory rents from their leaseholders. The individual homeowner, particularly current homeowners, will be cheated out of any opportunity to cash in on his investment.


4 posted on 06/24/2005 1:02:22 PM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Balrog of Morgoth
That point was made by a caller to Rush's show today and it is exactly right. What happens if you acquire a parcel of land to put a store on and someone makes a much richer offer for the same ground, the city council can use eminent domain to take your ground away from you. Nasty stuff all of this is!
5 posted on 06/24/2005 1:04:41 PM PDT by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide; 4Liberty
Interesting conjectures.

Ping, 4Liberty.
6 posted on 06/24/2005 1:06:09 PM PDT by bwteim (Begin With The End In Mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B.Bumbleberry
but the Court was really confirming the status quo.

That is not really true. The status quo has been a movement in the direction of developers. The threat of a lawsuit to raise costs and delay or change construction plans has been an inducement to developers to pay more, often more than "market value" in order to get around problems. The Supreme Court has now signaled that we have arrived and that most lawsuits are pointless wastes of what you are going to get anyway.
7 posted on 06/24/2005 1:10:47 PM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

The only thing positive that I can see in this terrible ruling is states with legislatures that have any common sense whatsoever, will race to put bills through, preventing such abuses. I expect my state, Georgia, to do the right thing.


8 posted on 06/24/2005 1:12:44 PM PDT by doggieboy (Bush's exit strategy for Iraq is through Iran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

Good points.


9 posted on 06/24/2005 1:12:45 PM PDT by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
As the old saying goes: invest in real estate because they're not making more of it.

Real estate values are rarely static. Even in places where prices are depressed, historically they can be expected to recover and rise, often exponentially, spurred on by unforeseen and unanticipated developments.

Savvy developers know full well that today's appraised value is not tomorrow's. And they would not be interested in obtaining a private citizen's property at today's appraised value unless they were reasonably certain it will increase in value significantly and rather quickly.

Often in these deals the local government also gives the developer special tax concessions hoping to offset and exceed that loss of revenue with increased tax revenues from other spigots. A private citizen does not get these sweet deals.

The best hope a less powerful private citizen has is to to hold out for as long as he possibly can until the developer is willing to pay a price that more fully compensates the private citizen in light of what the developer expects to make on the property, all factors considered, including tax breaks and incentives. This is almost certainly a sum well in excess of the price the private citizen would receive via condemnation proceedings.

The Kelos decision gives local governments a green light to front chips to and assist private powerful well-connected developers in this high-stakes poker game with less powerful private citizens.

10 posted on 06/24/2005 1:15:10 PM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

Listen! Did you hear that popping noise? That was the housing bubble bursting.


11 posted on 06/24/2005 1:20:12 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles

But now condemnation proceedings will be so much cheaper that the developer can make a take-it-or-leave-it offer and go almost straight to eviction, keeping all the bennies.


12 posted on 06/24/2005 1:25:39 PM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: doggieboy

I think this is already going on to some extent. What I would like to see more than anything is to allow those whose property is condemned to be able to recover attorneys fees if they prevail in their challenges to compensation offered.


13 posted on 06/24/2005 1:34:17 PM PDT by B.Bumbleberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: doggieboy

How many state and local lawmakers are in debt to real estate interests in their locale? In local situations, particularly municipalities, the real estate interests are the political and economic power, and the legislatures are all too often their puppets.


14 posted on 06/24/2005 1:41:37 PM PDT by xkaydet65 (Peace, Love, Brotherhood, and Firepower. And the greatest of these is Firepower!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: B.Bumbleberry

Gun grabbing has been going around the country for years, too. You don't think that a SCOTUS decision codifying full-on gun-grabbing would drastically increase the number of guns seized?


15 posted on 06/24/2005 1:42:44 PM PDT by ellery (The true danger is when liberty is nibbled away, for expedience, and by parts. - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
I think you're exactly right.

Not in my state (Utah). We outmaneuvered them here and passed legislation preventing it. But people in states such as Connecticut will see it happen just as you outlined.

16 posted on 06/24/2005 1:52:40 PM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ellery
Do you know what your state constitution has to say about the right to keep and bear arms? In my experience many Second Amendment experts don't have a clue when I ask them this question.

We all need to remember that state constitutions are important too. Kelos should help make this point clear.

17 posted on 06/24/2005 1:56:13 PM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles

I do -- but it's something I just started paying attention to recently. I think you're absolutely right -- our state Constitutions are as important as the federal one (at least if you believe in states' rights).


18 posted on 06/24/2005 5:50:42 PM PDT by ellery (The true danger is when liberty is nibbled away, for expedience, and by parts. - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

I worry that this ruling with lead to a "Carl Drega"-type result with respect to developers, local officials, and the judges that abet them.


19 posted on 06/24/2005 7:16:40 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

Whoever we are
Wherever we're from
We shoulda noticed by now
Our behavior is dumb
And if our chances
Expect to improve
It's gonna take a lot more
Than tryin' to remove
The other race
Or the other whatever
From the face
Of the planet altogether

They call it THE EARTH
Which is a dumb kinda name
But they named it right
'Cause we behave the same...
*We are dumb all over*
Dumb all over,
Yes we are
Dumb all over,
Near 'n far
Dumb all over,
Black 'n white
People, we is not wrapped tight

Nurds on the left
Nurds on the right
Religous fanatics
On the air every night
Sayin' the Bible
Tells the story
Makes the details
Sound real gory
'Bout what to do
If the geeks over there
Don't believe in the book
We got over here

You can't run a race
Without no feet
'N pretty soon
There won't be no street
For dummies to jog on
Or doggies to dog on
Religous fanatics
Can make it be all gone
(I mean it won't blow up
'N disappear
It'll just look ugly
For a thousand years...)

You can't run a country
By a book of religion
Not by a heap
Or a lump or a smidgeon
Of foolish rules
Of ancient date
Designed to make
You all feel great
While you fold, spindle
And mutilate
Those unbelievers
From a neighboring state


TO ARMS! TO ARMS!
Hooray! That's great
Two legs ain't bad
Unless there's a crate
They ship the parts
To mama in
For souvenirs: two ears *(Get Down!)*
Not his, not hers, *(but what the hey?)*
The Good Book says:
*("It gotta be that way!")*
But their book says:
*"REVENGE THE CRUSADES...
With whips 'n chains
'N hand grenades..."*
TWO ARMS? TWO ARMS?
Have another and another
Our God says:
*"There ain't no other!"*
Our God says
*"It's all okay!"*
Our God says
*"This is the way!"*

It says in the book:
*"Burn 'n destroy...*
*'N repent, 'n redeem*
*'N revenge, 'n deploy*
*'N rumble thee forth*
*To the land of the unbelieving scum on
the other side*
*'Cause they don't go for what's in the
book*
*'N that makes 'em BAD*
*So verily we must choppeth them up*
*And stompeth them down*
*Or rent a nice French bomb*
*To poof them out of existance
*While leaving their real estate just where
we need it*
*To use again*
*For temples in which to praise
OUR GOD*
*("Cause he can really take care of
business!")*

And when his humble TV servant
With humble white hair
And humble glasses
And a nice brown suit
And maybe a blond wife who takes
phone calls
Tells us our God says
It's okay to do this stuff
Then we gotta do it,
'Cause if we don't do it,
We ain't gwine up to *hebbin!*
(Depending on which book you're using
at the time...Can't use theirs... it don't work
...it's all lies...Gotta use mine...)
Ain't that right?
That's what they say
Every night...
Every day...
Hey, we can't really be dumb
If we're just following *God's Orders*
Hey, let's get serious...
God knows what he's doin'
He wrote this book here
An' the book says:
*He made us all to be just like Him,"
so...
If we're dumb...
Then God is dumb...
*(An' maybe even a little ugly on the side)*

frank zappa...dumb all over


20 posted on 06/24/2005 10:25:08 PM PDT by antmanbee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson