Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court rules cities may seize homes
charlotte.com - AP ^ | Jun. 23, 2005 | HOPE YEN

Posted on 06/23/2005 8:07:27 AM PDT by Stew Padasso

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 721-728 next last
To: Stew Padasso

Nice to know that the Constitution is official toilet paper. Federal "rights" trump all State rights and private property is a convinience not a God given right. How frigging nice. China has this level of private property protection. We are heading down hill to meet the chinese.


61 posted on 06/23/2005 8:24:52 AM PDT by jb6 ( Free Haghai Sophia! Crusade!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stew Padasso
Nice to know that the Constitution is official toilet paper. Federal "rights" trump all State rights and private property is a convenience not a God given right. How frigging nice. China has this level of private property protection. We are heading down hill to meet the chinese.
62 posted on 06/23/2005 8:25:01 AM PDT by jb6 ( Free Haghai Sophia! Crusade!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

WARNING

Stop posting threats now!


63 posted on 06/23/2005 8:25:02 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skimbell

Do you think the socialists realize that THEIR constitutents are most likely to be harmed by this?


64 posted on 06/23/2005 8:25:10 AM PDT by jess35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RedMonqey
It means us landowners are only SERFS paying rent on property owned by the ruling classes and their government puppets. When they decide to kick us off our own land, they can legally do so.

How true, that is just around the corner.

65 posted on 06/23/2005 8:25:17 AM PDT by blueriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Ron in Acreage
The media are polling themselves as we speak, to decide which side to take. The powerful over the people? They will side with the stormtroopers in robes.

Yep, I'd be surprised if the MSM sided against this USSC decision. Just take a look at the judges who dissented: O'Connor, Rehnquist, Scalia, Thomas.

Not to mention that the ruling benefits the MSM's big corporations.

66 posted on 06/23/2005 8:25:23 AM PDT by Tired of Taxes (News junkie here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: skimbell
This is about the government taking your property to give to another privat individual, not about the government taking your property (with appropriate compensation) to build roads.
67 posted on 06/23/2005 8:26:03 AM PDT by Finger Monkey (H.R. 25, Fair Tax Act - A consumption tax which replaces the income tax, SS tax, death tax, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: BerthaDee

It would take a lot more then this to drive the American soccor mom sheeple to revolution: like another scandal in Gitmo (the stuff that really "matters").


68 posted on 06/23/2005 8:26:05 AM PDT by jb6 ( Free Haghai Sophia! Crusade!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TheOtherOne
I have my own case pending in Conn. Appellate Court on eminent domain, where I argued the position of the dissent in the underlying State case.

Whether its the Trade Center Memorial, illegals, the peoples' "backbone" on terrorism, the leftist agenda in the public schools- the elites truly are out of step with the people and the Constitution.

Consider, that a woman who lost her husband at the WTC had a debate with Toffel yesterday on Fox, and afterward off camera, in the most heinous act of condescension befitting Schiavo, Toffel said to her, "Nice try".

That remark epitomizes the arrogance of the elites- and in my view- a day of reckoning is coming. No not a revolution, but more and more organizations like the Minutemen.
69 posted on 06/23/2005 8:26:40 AM PDT by sirthomasthemore (I go to my execution as the King's humble servant, but God's first!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BerthaDee
Revolution, anyone?

Image hosted by Photobucket.com

I prefer a revolution in dance. B-)

Dead serious, I know here in Pittsburgh, we have had several cases of corporations using emminent domain laws to grab land from homeowners and small shopkeepers from time to time and all of this just opens the doors to this stuff. I have no more respect for the justice system anymore.
70 posted on 06/23/2005 8:27:04 AM PDT by Nowhere Man (Lutheran, Conservative, Neo-Victorian/Edwardian, Michael Savage in '08! - DeCAFTA-nate CAFTA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Stew Padasso

I promise not only to never go to New London, I will never visit the state of Connecticut. To hell with the money grubbers!


71 posted on 06/23/2005 8:27:14 AM PDT by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stew Padasso

Lets organize the "free republic economic group." What we need to do is home in on wealthy liberals' homes and build offices. We can generate tax revenue for cities by selling property rights apparral.


72 posted on 06/23/2005 8:27:40 AM PDT by followerofchrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Question: Is suggesting a revolution a threat?


73 posted on 06/23/2005 8:27:56 AM PDT by Finger Monkey (H.R. 25, Fair Tax Act - A consumption tax which replaces the income tax, SS tax, death tax, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: DSDan

He's talking about Walmart strip malls.


74 posted on 06/23/2005 8:28:41 AM PDT by jb6 ( Free Haghai Sophia! Crusade!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BerthaDee

That's "private."


75 posted on 06/23/2005 8:28:47 AM PDT by Finger Monkey (H.R. 25, Fair Tax Act - A consumption tax which replaces the income tax, SS tax, death tax, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: jb6
It would take a lot more then this to drive the American soccor mom sheeple to revolution

Start taking their homes and see what happens.

This was a dangerous decision because wars have started for less than this.

76 posted on 06/23/2005 8:29:57 AM PDT by jess35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: conservativewasp

The revolution was fought over a low 10% tax and the housing of British soldiers. Hardly a comparison to our present "enlightened" tax system and the land grabbing bastards that rule us serfs.


77 posted on 06/23/2005 8:30:28 AM PDT by jb6 ( Free Haghai Sophia! Crusade!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: BerthaDee

Vote the bastRATs out to oblivion! This is not a threat, this is wakeup call!


78 posted on 06/23/2005 8:31:23 AM PDT by Leo Carpathian (FReeeePeee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: jess35
wars have started for less than this.

Wars have started for this reason exactly.

79 posted on 06/23/2005 8:31:27 AM PDT by Finger Monkey (H.R. 25, Fair Tax Act - A consumption tax which replaces the income tax, SS tax, death tax, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: jb6

It is official citizens no long own property, you can only rent it, with the possibility of eviction at anytime.


80 posted on 06/23/2005 8:31:36 AM PDT by commonerX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 721-728 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson