[Tired of Taxes]

The media are polling themselves as we speak, to decide which side to take. The powerful over the people? They will side with the stormtroopers in robes.

Yep, I'd be surprised if the MSM sided against this USSC decision. Just take a look at the judges who dissented: O'Connor, Rehnquist, Scalia, Thomas.

Not to mention that the ruling benefits the MSM's big corporations.

[Ron in Acreage]

What back page will the Post and Times hide this decision by their liberal dictators? Hitler would be proud.

[Steve_Seattle]

"Yep, I'd be surprised if the MSM sided against this USSC decision."

I agree. It's highly unlikely that the MSM will oppose this massive extension of governmental bullying power, even if private developers are incidental beneficiaries. It's the liberals' goal to get everybody crammed into apartments, and this facilitates that goal; they're never going to us eminent domain to create single-family housing.

[Steve_Seattle]

"Yep, I'd be surprised if the MSM sided against this USSC decision."

I agree. It's highly unlikely that the MSM will oppose this massive extension of governmental bullying power, even if private developers are incidental beneficiaries. It's the liberals' goal to get everybody crammed into apartments, and this facilitates that goal; they're never going to us eminent domain to create single-family housing.