WARNING
Stop posting threats now!
Question: Is suggesting a revolution a threat?
Are insults OK?
Ruth Bader Vader Ginsberg: doesn't she look like that homely chicken with the egg-head son Foghorn Leghorn was always mooching off?
And Souter, GHWB's appointment: what a *dis*appointment!
Kennedy, again citing Martian condemnation law.
These birds can make-up constitutional rights out of whole cloth, but apparently can't read the following:
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment05
So much for the notion of "private property".
I would like to add one more reason. If we can restrain our rhetoric on this issue, we are likely to be joined by many affluent liberals. It is a rare issue on which moderation of rhetoric is a practical tactic. The threats posted are highly unlikely to be carried out BUT verrrrry likely to be repeated elsewhere and held against us.
This additional reason is unnecessary (since you guys make the rules and we post here on condition of obeying them) but may be found desirable. If I am butting in where I don't belong, I will shut up on additional reasons but this issue has "wedge issue" written all over it.