Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mexican drug commandos expand ops in 6 U.S. states
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | June 21, 2005

Posted on 06/21/2005 12:41:10 PM PDT by robowombat

Mexican drug commandos expand ops in 6 U.S. states Feds say violent, elite paramilitary units establish narcotics routes north of border

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted: June 21, 2005 1:00 a.m. Eastern

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © 2005 WorldNetDaily.com

WASHINGTON – The ultra-violent, U.S.-trained elite, Mexican paramilitary commandos known as the "Zetas," responsible for hundreds of murders along the border this year, have expanded their enforcement efforts on behalf of a drug cartel by setting up trafficking routes in six U.S. states.

A U.S. Justice Department memo says the U.S.-trained units have recently moved operations into Houston, San Antonio and the states of California, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Georgia and Florida. They have been operating in Dallas for at least two years, according to the feds.

The original Zetas are former Mexican army commandos, some apparently trained in the U.S. by Army special forces to combat drug gangs. Members of a broader Zetas organization have worked for the Gulf cartel since 2001. They provide firepower, security and the force needed to oversee shipments of narcotics and smuggled aliens along the border and up Interstate 35, which runs through Texas and Oklahoma.

According to FBI officials, the Zetas are attempting to consolidate their grip on the smuggling route along I-35. Anyone caught not paying the 10 percent commission they charge on all cargo – drugs or humans – is killed, according to U.S. and Mexican law enforcement sources.

The Zetas have also brought their cold-blooded killing tactics to the U.S., say federal law enforcement authorities – murdering rival drug dealers and sometimes innocent bystanders.

"Texas law enforcement officials report that the Zetas have been active in the Dallas area since 2003," said the Justice Department intelligence bulletin circulated among U.S. law enforcement officials. "Eight to ten members of the Zetas have been involved in multiple assaults and are believed to have hired criminal gangs in the area ... for contract killings."

The feds say the group has begun establishing its own trafficking routes into the United States and will protect them at any cost.

"U.S. law enforcement have reported bounties offered by Los Zetas of between $30,000 and $50,000 for the killing of Border Patrol agents and other law enforcement officers," the bulletin said. "If a Zeta kills an American law enforcement officer and can successfully make it back to Mexico, his stature within the organization will be increased dramatically."

The Zetas take their name from a radio code once used by its members. While originally there were 68, the Zetas have trained a second generation of commandos – many of them sons and nephews of those trained by U.S. military forces to combat drug trafficking in Mexico. U.S. law enforcement officials say they now number more than 700. Their numbers also include some Mexican army deserters and former federal police officers.

U.S. and Mexican law enforcement authorities say the Zetas operate special training camps in the Mexican states of Tamaulipas and Michoacán, where newly recruited Zetas take intensive six-week training courses in weapons, tactics and intelligence gathering.

The Zetas conducting a bloody war for control of the entire southern border in an effort to secure a monopoly on drug-smuggling and people-smuggling routes, according to law enforcement officials.

At least 600 have been killed this year in a wave of violence waged by the Zetas gang, headed by reputed drug kingpin Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, said Mexico's Attorney General Daniel Cabeza de Vaca.

Among the victims of the U.S-trained Zetas have been other suspected smugglers, hit men, police, soldiers and civilians on both sides of the 2,000-mile border.

There are widespread reports of the commandos making cross-border runs into U.S. territory in military-style vehicles, armed with automatic weapons.

The U.S. government spent millions of dollars training Los Zetas to intercept drugs, some of them coming from Mexico's southern border, before they could reach the U.S. The U.S. government has also sent U.S. Border Patrol agents to Mexico's southern border with Guatemala to train law enforcement and military forces to intercept human smugglers destined to reach the U.S.

Guzman, whose nickname means "Shorty," bribed guards to escape from prison in 2001. He is one of Mexico's most-wanted fugitives. U.S. authorities have offered a $5 million reward for his capture.

The spike in killings and kidnappings in northern Mexico in recent months has made headlines and prompted federal agents and soldiers to patrol the streets of Nuevo Laredo, across from Laredo, Texas. Recently, a new police chief in Nuevo Laredo was assassinated nine hours after taking office.

Among the 600 people murdered in gang shootings across the Mexican border this year, many were slain execution-style, with their hands tied behind their backs.

The violence along the border has reached a point where some are questioning President Vicente Fox's ability to govern the country.

A senior U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration official, Anthony Placido, told Congress last week that Mexico's corrupt police forces were "all too often part of the problem rather than part of the solution" in fighting the drug cartels.

Fox won office in 2000, ending 71 years of one-party rule and promising to clamp down on the multibillion-dollar cross-border trade in cocaine, marijuana and heroin.

While initially winning praise for putting bosses like Benjamin Arellano Felix and Osiel Cardenas behind bars, his crime-busting reputation has been undermined by the alarming rise in violence, along with evidence Fox has failed to clean up Mexico's police forces.

Faced with the fallout on its southern frontier, the State Department has twice issued travel warnings for the Mexican border, where more than 30 U.S. citizens have been kidnapped.

Mexico's apparent inability to curb the bloodshed on the 2,000-mile border is affecting the financial markets. Banking group HSBC said "staggering" levels of violence could raise questions about Mexico's stability in the run-up to next year's presidential election. Fox is constitutionally barred from running for re-election.

His approval rating has taken a hit, dropping 3 points to 56 percent in a poll in May, with many Mexicans complaining of safety fears, particularly in the north.

Fox has pledged a "mother of all battles" against the drug traffickers he says are openly challenging the government.

"We have taken on the challenge and we will do battle against all the cartels' criminals and against organized crime," Fox said in a speech Friday.

He sent hundreds of troops and federal agents to the states of Tamaulipas, Sinaloa and Baja California last week after suspected drug hit men killed the police chief of Nuevo Laredo.

Despite the move, drug gangs shot and killed at least 11 people across the three states during the week, prompting observers to declare the operation, dubbed "Mexico Secure," a failure.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Mexico; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: Oklahoma; US: Texas; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aliens; bordersecurity; bushamnesty; dhs; hispanicterrorgroup; illegalaliens; mexico; wodlist; zetas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 301-311 next last
To: Travis McGee

The fences at the U.S. Mexico border.

81 posted on 06/21/2005 9:01:40 PM PDT by bayourod (Unless we get 40% of the Hispanic vote in 2008, President Hillary will take all your guns away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
In some places.
82 posted on 06/21/2005 9:08:25 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
LOL. Somehow, I don't think so.


83 posted on 06/21/2005 9:08:37 PM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Operation Gate Keeper, designed by the military, was launched on October 1,1994. It was our test to see just how effective we could be at stopping illegal immigration.

A three tier line of defense including double fences (some concrete and steel), guard towers, flood lights infrared cameras, under ground sensors, patrol roads, night scopes, horse patrols, ATV patrols, 16 helicopters, fixed wing aircraft, unmanned aerial vehicles, trucks, and a ratio of 32 guards per mile were incorporated.

It was successful in reducing the number of immigrants crossing at that sector. Most just went further East to cross, but still about two hundred thousand are caught each year trying to cross, and another estimated 30 to 40 thousand make it across undetected. They dig under, climb over and break through the fences. That’s an average of 454 to 606 per mile per year.

Extrapolating the cost/benefit results of Operation Gatekeeper to the entire 105,000 mile coastline and land borders of the United States, at 32 guards per mile at $175,000 per guard, it would cost $588 Billion Dollars per year and still 47 to 63 Million people could cross undetected into the U.S. each year.

The Inspector General's Report On Operation Gatekeeper found in part:"For the first six months of 1996, the average daily low estimate of effectiveness was 17 percent and the average daily high estimate was 27 percent. The lowest estimate was 10 percent, the highest, 41 percent."

How confident was the government that Operation Gate Keeper would seal the border? Here's what our friend from the Terrorism Commission said at the time:

There are no legitimate studies showing that it is possible to seal the border. The problems of illegal immigration are going to have to be addressed at the destination of the border jumpers.

84 posted on 06/21/2005 9:58:38 PM PDT by bayourod (Unless we get 40% of the Hispanic vote in 2008, President Hillary will take all your guns away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: bayourod

What percentage of our 2000 mile land border with Mexico looks like your picture? Exactly where is it?

What is the logic of putting a bank vault door on one window of a house with 30 windows and five outside doors, if the rest of them are wide open?


85 posted on 06/21/2005 11:03:45 PM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Less than 66 miles. That's part of Operation Gatekeeper in California. Read the Inspector General's report for more details.

"What is the logic of putting a bank vault door on one window of a house with 30 windows and five outside doors, if the rest of them are wide open? "

To see if the vault door works. If people keep breaking in through the bank vault door you know that it would be a waste of time to put vault doors on the other 30 windows.

That's what happened with Operation Gatekeeper. The original plan was to have those double and triple fences stretch all the way from San Diego to ElPaso, but the plan was abandoned when the test showed that the fences didn't work.

They kept vehicles from going through and marked the borderline but they didn't even slow down border jumpers. Don't you think you could get past those fences?.

Check it out yourself. Once you see what the actual facts are you will no longer have any respect for people who think that we can seal the borders with fences.

86 posted on 06/21/2005 11:27:41 PM PDT by bayourod (Unless we get 40% of the Hispanic vote in 2008, President Hillary will take all your guns away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights

I agree with you about people intoxicated at work and elsewhere.
That's why that also is against the law. Yep~


87 posted on 06/22/2005 12:31:19 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: coloradan

Stalking would be mild compared to business relations between a drug supplier and a drug dealer.

They are starting to use the racketeering laws against them. :-)


88 posted on 06/22/2005 12:33:16 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: the anti-liberal
Like is said:

"So who are all the violent people carrying all the illegal drugs across from Mexico to the United States?"

89 posted on 06/22/2005 12:34:29 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

And again you miss the point. Who is the identifiable victim in a drug transaction? And would you use a smiley if they were using anti-terrorism laws? That's not what they were for, and it isn't what RICO was for, either. Well, the ends justify the means, right?


90 posted on 06/22/2005 6:48:01 AM PDT by coloradan (Hence, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
I agree with you about people intoxicated at work and elsewhere. That's why that also is against the law.

But intoxication in one's own home is legal (so long as no minors are in one's care), as is the making, selling, and possession of alcohol ... so there's no reason for more stringent rules to apply to other drugs.

91 posted on 06/22/2005 10:15:45 AM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights

That might make sense, if the intoxication were identical of all drugs.

Otherwise you're comparing a butter knife to a nuclear weapon.. Which you always do with drugs.


92 posted on 06/22/2005 10:17:49 AM PDT by G32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Why does this sound like we're at war right here?!!!!


93 posted on 06/22/2005 10:19:58 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G32
That might make sense, if the intoxication were identical of all drugs.

That's another of your silly statements; the more one takes of any drug, including alcohol, the more intoxicated one gets.

94 posted on 06/22/2005 10:25:01 AM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
The ultra-violent, U.S.-trained elite, Mexican paramilitary commandos known as the "Zetas," responsible for hundreds of murders along the border this year, have expanded their enforcement efforts on behalf of a drug cartel by setting up trafficking routes in six U.S. states.

Gee, I wonder why their not crossing our borders, setting up trafficking routes, and committing hundreds of murders for tequila?  Hmmm...

 

 

95 posted on 06/22/2005 10:26:41 AM PDT by itsamelman (“Announcing your plans is a good way to hear God laugh.” -- Al Swearengen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights

This article's not about alcohol. Can you ever talk about drugs without mentioning it? I know you can't, but seriously.

Intoxication is not the same between all drugs. If they were, nobody would use different ones. Comparing them like you do is so damn stupid.


96 posted on 06/22/2005 10:27:29 AM PDT by G32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: G32
Comparing them [alcohol and other drugs] like you do is so damn stupid.

No, it makes perfect sense in the context of A CA Guy's pro-WOD argument, "drugged people violate the rights of employers and employees regarding their personal safety and liability risks to all around them", since the same statement is true for the drug alcohol.

97 posted on 06/22/2005 10:49:41 AM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights

Again, it might make sense to someone with an altered mind..


98 posted on 06/22/2005 11:03:11 AM PDT by G32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

Comment #99 Removed by Moderator

To: Know your rights
You can't always be intoxicated in your home. As you yourself admit, you can't participate in child endangerment while drunk.

If you have your business out of your house and you have an employee, you legally can't be drunk either because that is an illegal work enjoyment under both the health code and under the rules of running a business.

You also know what you get with alcohol, but with various drugs there are no standards unless you get them from your doctor legally for a condition. So it's a lot more dangerous to do drugs illegally.

Plus alcohol in moderation or less is actually is good for you to both thin the blood and to purify the food.
Illegal drugs poison you and cause various medical conditions in various ways.
100 posted on 06/22/2005 11:17:10 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 301-311 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson