To: A CA Guy
I agree with you about people intoxicated at work and elsewhere. That's why that also is against the law.But intoxication in one's own home is legal (so long as no minors are in one's care), as is the making, selling, and possession of alcohol ... so there's no reason for more stringent rules to apply to other drugs.
91 posted on
06/22/2005 10:15:45 AM PDT by
Know your rights
(The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
To: Know your rights
That might make sense, if the intoxication were identical of all drugs.
Otherwise you're comparing a butter knife to a nuclear weapon.. Which you always do with drugs.
92 posted on
06/22/2005 10:17:49 AM PDT by
G32
To: Know your rights
You can't always be intoxicated in your home. As you yourself admit, you can't participate in child endangerment while drunk.
If you have your business out of your house and you have an employee, you legally can't be drunk either because that is an illegal work enjoyment under both the health code and under the rules of running a business.
You also know what you get with alcohol, but with various drugs there are no standards unless you get them from your doctor legally for a condition. So it's a lot more dangerous to do drugs illegally.
Plus alcohol in moderation or less is actually is good for you to both thin the blood and to purify the food.
Illegal drugs poison you and cause various medical conditions in various ways.
100 posted on
06/22/2005 11:17:10 AM PDT by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: Know your rights
But intoxication in one's own home is legal (so long as no minors are in one's care), as is the making, selling, and possession of alcohol ... so there's no reason for more stringent rules to apply to other drugs. Still promoting drugs I see, MrLeRoy.
305 posted on
06/25/2005 7:13:29 PM PDT by
Hacksaw
(Real men don't buy their firewood.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson