Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mexican drug commandos expand ops in 6 U.S. states
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | June 21, 2005

Posted on 06/21/2005 12:41:10 PM PDT by robowombat

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 301-311 next last
To: Javelina
Yes! We're under attack! Please send supplies and money to me, so I can defend California Who says I can't take MASSIVE ribbing for my little mistake? LOL!
101 posted on 06/22/2005 11:19:17 AM PDT by Iron Matron (The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , By the Blood of our Forefathers a Sovereign Nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
"And again you miss the point. Who is the identifiable victim in a drug transaction?"

Well, all of America would be the victim of course by the irresponsibility and related criminality of users and the people connected to providing the drugs.

The pro drug crowd, homosexual activists and communist party are all on the same page in politics. All want the worst for America and wish to violate the American citizens with their vice or anarchy.

102 posted on 06/22/2005 11:27:42 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Happy integration with Mexico.


103 posted on 06/22/2005 11:29:29 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
You also know what you get with alcohol, but with various drugs there are no standards unless you get them from your doctor legally for a condition. So it's a lot more dangerous to do drugs illegally.

I do not believe illegal drugs are good for anyone, but I also believe the War on Drugs should end. Then, Rather than making all drugs legal, they should just be, "not illegal", no law on the books at all.

Why?

1) The government has no business telling a free individual what they may or may not consume - no matter how harmful it is to the individual. (I believe this about seat belts too..children must, Adults can make their OWN, Adult, decision!)

2) If a person on drugs commits a crime, any crime, the crime itself is punishable. When a drunkard or druggie gets in a car and kills someone on the road..the person is just as dead no matter what was consumed. Crimes committed while under the influence are still crimes..no matter the intoxicant. The intoxicant SHOULD NOT be the crime!

3) The war on drugs has created a whole new class of "criminal" , people that are not a real criminal element, are not a threat to society..just weak. Is that worth ten years in prison? I think not.

104 posted on 06/22/2005 11:38:22 AM PDT by Iron Matron (The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , By the Blood of our Forefathers a Sovereign Nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Iron Matron

I believe the war on drugs, terror, gangs should continue.

I don't think we should give into thugs, addicts or terrorists because they don't fold immediately.

America isn't for all the anarchist, terrorists or gangland thugs, so I have no problem if they use up to deadly force and confiscate all their wealth in the process of teaching them the word "NO"!


105 posted on 06/22/2005 11:42:48 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
U.S. Drug Trade is Run By Mexican Paramilitary !

A Mexican paramilitary group trained by the U.S. in running the cocaine trade in the U.S. This group is expanding its influence every day. They are now operating in seven states and will be in your state very soon. NAFTA enables drug traffickers. The proof is in the pudding and the mixture is corrupt as hell. The corruption is wide and deep and extends to top Mexican and U.S. officials.

Read Reports Here

We Need the 'Minutemen' because of NAFTA and because neither Mexican or U.S. officials give a damn about open the border. Officials don't give a damn because they are getting rich off the drug trade. 'Nuff said.

106 posted on 06/22/2005 11:52:50 AM PDT by ex-Texan (Mathew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G32
Again, it might make sense to someone with an altered mind..

Personal attacks instead of arguments. Typical pro-WOD zombie.

107 posted on 06/22/2005 11:54:09 AM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
You can't always be intoxicated in your home. As you yourself admit, you can't participate in child endangerment while drunk.

If you have your business out of your house and you have an employee, you legally can't be drunk either because that is an illegal work enjoyment under both the health code and under the rules of running a business.

So it makes sense to support those same limited restrictions for other drugs ... but it still makes no sense to support the stronger restrictions that are now in place.

You also know what you get with alcohol, but with various drugs there are no standards

That's entirely due to their illegality; when alcohol was illegal there were no standards for that drug.

Illegal drugs poison you

So does alcohol ... in fact, unlike marijuana, it can cause a fatal overdose.

and cause various medical conditions in various ways.

So does alcohol, for example, cirrhosis of the liver.

108 posted on 06/22/2005 11:58:58 AM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Calico Cat

"I'm sure that good old reliable Bayourod will be posting to this thread soon! "

Is he still around? lol


109 posted on 06/22/2005 11:59:17 AM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (3-7-77 (No that's not a Date))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights

110 posted on 06/22/2005 12:00:26 PM PDT by G32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: backtothestreets

Our California, incidentally, is called "Alta California" by many, with the implication that it is rightfully part of Mexico.


111 posted on 06/22/2005 12:02:56 PM PDT by ko_kyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy; coloradan
Who is the identifiable victim in a drug transaction?

Well, all of America would be the victim of course by the irresponsibility and related criminality of users and the people connected to providing the drugs.

You didn't answer the question. The irresponsibility and related criminality would be illegal whether or not the drug transaction was illegal, and could be present whether or not a drug transaction even took place. One more time: Who is the identifiable victim in a drug transaction?

There was irresponsibility and related criminality by sellers and buyers of alcohol during Prohibition, but that was no argument for retaining Prohibition.

112 posted on 06/22/2005 12:03:38 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights

We do allow all drugs in homes that are regulated by the food and drug administration and used under the direction of a doctor. No problem, it's that way now.

The rest would be called criminal activity and should be dealt with accordingly.

I'm surprised since we don't like the anarchist, or homosexual agenda activists here, that somehow your pro adiction activists are allowed on a conservative site.
There is nothing conservative about a pro-illegal drug agenda.


113 posted on 06/22/2005 12:04:31 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
I don't think we should give into thugs, addicts or terrorists because they don't fold immediately.

Nor should we channel inflated profits into the hands of thugs and terrorists with a futile War On Drugs.

114 posted on 06/22/2005 12:05:31 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights

I did answer, all of America are the victims of illegal drug use. It is connected to violence, irresponsibility and a huge cost to society to handle these people medically.

Better they die of overdoses soon after they start their habits rather than living long enough to pass their addictions on to innocent children who deserve a recreational drug free life.


115 posted on 06/22/2005 12:06:39 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
We do allow all drugs in homes that are regulated by the food and drug administration and used under the direction of a doctor.

We don't have those restrictions for the deadly, addictive, violence-inducing drug alcohol, so it makes no sense to have them for other drugs ... especially the milder-than-alcohol drug marijuana.

116 posted on 06/22/2005 12:07:27 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights
"Nor should we channel inflated profits into the hands of thugs and terrorists with a futile War On Drugs."

INFLATED PROFITS????? What inflated profits are connected to illegal drugs?

The best we could really hope for is the major dealers and distributors put up a fight and get a bullet in their head to reduce the number of criminals that hurt our youth. They are the same to this country as the terrorists.

117 posted on 06/22/2005 12:10:09 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
illegal drug use. [...] is connected to violence, irresponsibility

So was alcohol use when alcohol was illegal, but that was no argument for keeping alcohol illegal.

and a huge cost to society to handle these people medically.

There's a huge medical cost to handle overeaters, but that's no argument for government banning overeating.

Better they die of overdoses soon after they start their habits

Then stop interfering by imposing legal punishments, and let them get on with it.

118 posted on 06/22/2005 12:11:16 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
What inflated profits are connected to illegal drugs?

You're kidding, right? One sticks a seed in the ground, later collects the plant's buds, and sells them for $100 an ounce ... and you think there are no inflated profits involved?!

119 posted on 06/22/2005 12:13:28 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: G32
Is that supposed to mean something?
120 posted on 06/22/2005 12:13:57 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 301-311 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson