Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Painted pearl unlocks secret of Raphael's love
Reuters ^ | 6/17/05 | Clara Ferreira-Marques

Posted on 06/19/2005 1:18:03 PM PDT by wagglebee

MILAN (Reuters) - The tiny pearl brooch seems an innocuous detail in Raphael's enigmatic "Fornarina" portrait, but for one group of historians it unlocks a scandalous love affair kept secret for centuries.

According to new research published in May, the pearl, pinned onto an elaborate turban, is part of a web of allusions to the Renaissance artist's clandestine marriage to the beautiful sitter, a baker's daughter -- despite a very public engagement to the niece of a powerful Vatican cardinal.

Officially, Raphael died a bachelor at 37.

"It was an impossible love affair," says Maurizio Bernardelli Curuz, editor of specialist journal Stile, who led a year of research into Raphael's romantic riddle.

"It is hard to overstate Raphael's status in Rome -- he was a superstar. The distance separating them was like that which today would separate George Clooney and his cleaner."

The pearl, also included in the "Velata" portrait, suggests the sitter's name was Margherita -- the Latin word for pearl -- and not Maria Bibbiena, the artist's intended bride.

It ties Margherita to a string of nuptial allegories in the "Fornarina," from the band on her arm bearing Raphael's name -- an unusual way to sign a painting -- to a wedding ring on her finger, later covered up by the painter's anxious students.

"It may seem artificial to us, but these were everyday games at the Renaissance courts," says Bernardelli Curuz.

"At least until the 18th Century, the allegorical side of painting was extremely important. It was Impressionism that dampened our ability to read a painting like a book."

The art historian says he has found evidence to support the allegories, from contemporary documents to X-rays of the "Fornarina" painting carried out during a recent restoration.

"Of course this is not just about the pearl, nor is it just about the documents. The absolute certainty comes from the way everything fits together," he says.

"But the pearl was what tipped us off -- we would have been forcing the allegory if it had been the other way around."

PEARLS, MYRTLE AND QUINCE

The notion that Margherita was Raphael's mistress is not altogether new -- inspired by her coy smile in the "Fornarina," 19th century France's Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres painted the muse sitting on the artist's knee. A century later, Picasso portrayed their trysts in a series of explicit drawings.

Novelist Honore de Balzac mentioned the two lovers.

But Bernardelli Curuz and his team have gone beyond the myth, tracing back the various symbols and uncovering documents to prove the two married in a secret ceremony, a relatively common practice at the time.

The historians say they have also proved conclusively that Margherita is the subject of both the "Fornarina" and of the "Velata," or veiled portrait, logged by one contemporary as the painting of the woman Raphael "loved until he died."

Transferring the face of one painting to the other, thanks to computer technology, there is more than a passing similarity.

And according to Bernardelli Curuz, Margherita is also to be found elsewhere in Raphael's work, from the "School of Athens" fresco to the walls of the Farnesina palace in Rome.

In the "School of Athens," painted on the walls of a room that is now part of the Vatican museum, all the characters are looking away or at each other -- only Margherita and Raphael himself are looking defiantly straight at the visitor.

But despite her presence in his paintings, Margherita's existence seems to have been kept carefully under wraps, if not by Raphael, then at least by his students.

Initial drawings uncovered under the "Fornarina" during recent restoration show the figure clothed in a diaphanous veil was sketched rapidly and presumably from life -- another indication of the painter's ties to his muse.

The sketched figure is set against quince and myrtle bushes -- symbols of fertility and fidelity -- and wears a wedding ring on her left hand.

But the final painting, completed after Raphael's death with a clumsy hand, covers the bushes and the tell-tale ring.

"At the time of his death, Raphael's school was painting the Sala di Constantino in the Vatican and they wanted at all costs to avoid losing that commission. It could have meant bankruptcy," Bernardelli Curuz says.

"He had left the "Fornarina" unfinished and the students began to fret about the landscape, the ring, anything that could tie it to the marriage."

Michelangelo, Raphael's greatest rival, was pressing the Vatican to hand him the commission.

To silence the rumors, Raphael's students placed a plaque on his tomb in the memory of his eternal fiancee, Maria Bibbiena, as if to tie the two together after death.

Raven-haired Margherita was instead sent away. Four months after Raphael's death, the convent of Sant'Apollonia in Rome's Trastevere quarter registered the arrival of "widow Margherita," daughter of a Siena baker.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: art; fornarina; godsgravesglyphs; painting; raphael; renaissance
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: wagglebee

"Fornarina" means what? Fornicatrix? Is that a clue? Anyone know Italian?


21 posted on 06/19/2005 4:32:01 PM PDT by Veto! (Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republicanprofessor

Yes, please on your art lesson list.

Do you know what Fornarina means? Fornicatrix?


22 posted on 06/19/2005 4:38:17 PM PDT by Veto! (Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA
I would say that these are different women. The one of the left has detached lobes and the right has attached.


23 posted on 06/19/2005 4:49:42 PM PDT by Hillary's Lovely Legs (This post wasn't cleared by the Fresno Mafia, so I expect a personal attack any moment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Republicanprofessor

Please add me to your list.
Did we do Impressionists yet?


24 posted on 06/19/2005 4:58:04 PM PDT by mabelkitty (Lurk forever, but once you post, your newbness shines like a new pair of shoes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

margherita has to be one of the sexiest pictures in the western canon.


25 posted on 06/19/2005 5:01:13 PM PDT by ken21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
Good point. I wasn't sure if the difference wasn't an effect of shading and difference in the direction the model's head is turned. (Is "Velata's" detached lobe obscured behind her jaw line?}

As I said, I put very little effort into my comment. And I'm certainly no art expert! Just having a bit of amusement... '-)

26 posted on 06/19/2005 5:13:41 PM PDT by TXnMA (ATTN, ACLU & NAACP: There's no constitutionally protected right to NOT be offended -- Shove It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Add me to your ping list, too, please.


27 posted on 06/19/2005 5:15:44 PM PDT by tanuki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
I would say that these are different women. The one of the left has detached lobes and the right has attached.

Good point. I wasn't sure if the difference wasn't an effect of shading and difference in the direction the model's head is turned. (Is "Velata's" detached lobe obscured behind her jaw line?}

As I said, I put very little effort into my comment. And I'm certainly no art expert! Just having a bit of amusement... '-)

28 posted on 06/19/2005 5:21:04 PM PDT by TXnMA (ATTN, ACLU & NAACP: There's no constitutionally protected right to NOT be offended -- Shove It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

I think they look very similar.

29 posted on 06/19/2005 5:23:42 PM PDT by CaptainK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: eleni121

I thought it was an odd comparison, too. Clooney is hardly a superstar....not even close to being in the same league as an artist such as Raphael!
Maybe the writer of the article has a "Clooney" fixation, huh?
How else would someone come up with something so inane! Yeesh!


30 posted on 06/19/2005 5:25:40 PM PDT by derllak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs

Excellent point about the ears. Are you a budding art historian? Even the shapes of the ear otherwise look a little different. I've heard ears are even more different than fingerprints.


31 posted on 06/19/2005 6:07:06 PM PDT by Republicanprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
Yes, we did Impressionism a couple of weeks ago. I can only scratch the surface. Feel free to continue to make comments, as long as you ping me about them so I can catch them.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1414727/posts

Do a search under Art for keyword if you want the other "classes."

32 posted on 06/19/2005 6:10:28 PM PDT by Republicanprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: billorites

Another ping for you.


33 posted on 06/19/2005 6:18:59 PM PDT by Republicanprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs; Republicanprofessor; TXnMA
"I would say that these are different women. The one of the left has detached lobes and the right has attached. "

Yeah, right.
Nice earlobes.

34 posted on 06/19/2005 6:28:19 PM PDT by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA
I'd say the "Fornarina" and the" Velata" portray the same woman.

i don't think those ears look alike at all...

35 posted on 06/19/2005 7:47:20 PM PDT by latina4dubya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Republicanprofessor

The Fornarina is currently at the Indianapolis Museum of Art (along with Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres' painting and other associated works).
http://www.ima-art.org/

I haven't seen a reproduction of this painting that does it justice. It's truly stunning.


36 posted on 06/19/2005 7:59:05 PM PDT by brewer1516
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Veto!

I believe that "Fornarina" roughly means "little baker woman." This would go along with the belief that Raphael's lover was the daughter of a baker. I studied in Rome for a semester in college and right next door to my school in Trastevere was a restaurant called "La Fornarina." It occupied a building said to be the home of the original Fornarina. On the other side of the school was the Villa Farnesina which contains several wonderful frescoes by Raphael. Perhaps Raphael met this lady while in the neighborhood working on the villa's frescoes?

I'm surprised by how many people think Velata and Fornarina are the same woman. They look completely different to me - Velata being much prettier IMO. (pretty as a woman, not a painting - both paintings are beautiful)


37 posted on 06/19/2005 8:44:08 PM PDT by sassbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: sassbox

Of course, now that you mention it, the baker woman. A good restaurant chain in the USA is Il Fornaio, in San Fran, Seattle, Pasadena, other places. They always bake bread and sell it along with serving excellent meals.

How terrific to have spent a semester studying art in Rome! I'm so pleased that FR has this nice little culture corner where I can meet people who've done the things that interest me. I spent one month there in 97 visiting friends and sort of frumming around the city on my own, as they worked. At the Vatican Grill, I met a fellow --American as I recall-- who'd just completed the art for the improved Grand Central Station in NYC. His friends swore up and down that he had indeed done so....I forget his name but you probably can roll it off your tongue. He was, I think, teaching at the American U in Rome.


38 posted on 06/19/2005 10:02:31 PM PDT by Veto! (Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Veto!

One of my best semesters in college was to spend a semester in Florence, Italy. It was amazing to have lectures on site at the various churches, and to live with Italian families, speak Italian with them. It was wonderful just to experience a different culture and live the way they live.


39 posted on 06/20/2005 6:51:47 AM PDT by Republicanprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Republicanprofessor
Now this is art. And a very interesting discussion to boot. I especially like the inclusion of Michelangelo and the reasoning behind it. Not just art history but art as history

(Of course everything so far (except for the picture of the bent one) would pass the sofa test)

40 posted on 06/20/2005 7:19:50 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson