To: TXnMA
I would say that these are different women. The one of the left has detached lobes and the right has attached.
23 posted on
06/19/2005 4:49:42 PM PDT by
Hillary's Lovely Legs
(This post wasn't cleared by the Fresno Mafia, so I expect a personal attack any moment.)
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
Good point. I wasn't sure if the difference wasn't an effect of shading and difference in the direction the model's head is turned. (Is "Velata's" detached lobe obscured behind her jaw line?}
As I said, I put very little effort into my comment. And I'm certainly no art expert! Just having a bit of amusement... '-)
26 posted on
06/19/2005 5:13:41 PM PDT by
TXnMA
(ATTN, ACLU & NAACP: There's no constitutionally protected right to NOT be offended -- Shove It!)
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
I would say that these are different women. The one of the left has detached lobes and the right has attached. Good point. I wasn't sure if the difference wasn't an effect of shading and difference in the direction the model's head is turned. (Is "Velata's" detached lobe obscured behind her jaw line?}
As I said, I put very little effort into my comment. And I'm certainly no art expert! Just having a bit of amusement... '-)
28 posted on
06/19/2005 5:21:04 PM PDT by
TXnMA
(ATTN, ACLU & NAACP: There's no constitutionally protected right to NOT be offended -- Shove It!)
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
Excellent point about the ears. Are you a budding art historian? Even the shapes of the ear otherwise look a little different. I've heard ears are even more different than fingerprints.
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs; Republicanprofessor; TXnMA
"I would say that these are different women. The one of the left has detached lobes and the right has attached. "
Yeah, right.
Nice earlobes.
34 posted on
06/19/2005 6:28:19 PM PDT by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson