Skip to comments.
Reid: No docs, no Bolton
CNN ^
| 6/9/05
Posted on 06/09/2005 4:59:36 PM PDT by llevrok
Senate Democrats will not allow a vote on President Bush's choice for U.N. ambassador unless the White House hands over records of communications intercepts Bolton sought from the secretive National Security Agency, Minority Leader Harry Reid said Thursday.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; 2006; 2006elections; bolton; enemywithin; filibuster; mccarthywassoright; noboltonnomajority; nuclearoption; nukethemtiltheyglow; pullthetrigger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 281-296 next last
To: sirthomasthemore
The Dems have already delivered their part of the bargain by allowing the judicial nominations to proceed. A nuke now would seriously damage the credibility of the Pubs.
41
posted on
06/09/2005 5:27:18 PM PDT
by
soupcon
To: mwp99
good to hear it, notice how CNN buries the central issue on the bottom of the page?
42
posted on
06/09/2005 5:27:35 PM PDT
by
TeleStraightShooter
(When Frist exercises his belated Constitutional "Byrd option", Reid will have a "Nuclear Reaction".)
To: llevrok

Nuke'em. Nuke the *&^%$#@$^
43
posted on
06/09/2005 5:27:45 PM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: llevrok
...to which the president's response should be, "No Bolton, no US ambassador to the UN."
44
posted on
06/09/2005 5:27:55 PM PDT
by
clintonh8r
(Liberals preach comity and practice calumny.)
To: anniegetyourgun
Speaking of Reid, he is in a RED State isn't he, who we got to run against him?
We'll just have to do a Dashle on him, and the American People are not STUPID enough to believe the Democrats, the Democrats are going to be down to the 25 percent Looney Crowd for their base.
45
posted on
06/09/2005 5:28:31 PM PDT
by
agincourt1415
(4 More Years of NEW SHERIFF IN TOWN!)
To: SoCar
OK Dusty Reid, we will leave this UN Ambassador post vacant if you do not vote on Bolton. Who really cares?? When Bush gets around to it he can recess appoint him. You and your ilk are completely unnecessary! Just in case we need a US rep to vote for us on the UN SC, can the charge d'affairs (#2--acting ambassador) vote?
46
posted on
06/09/2005 5:30:08 PM PDT
by
CDB
To: sirthomasthemore
I could accept that actually, I like that idea. Take it to the mats over Bolton, he's not as "valuable" as a judge, is that your point?
To: tobyhill
He gave a recess appointment to Bill Pryor; Dubya should be more gutsy on Bolton.
To: llevrok
Remember the operation is being run by REPUBLICAN STEERS.
I have little hope that things will be better.
49
posted on
06/09/2005 5:31:08 PM PDT
by
pointsal
To: agincourt1415
Reid just won reelection, unfortunately. You can thank Rep. Gibbons for not running against him. He could have won.
50
posted on
06/09/2005 5:34:00 PM PDT
by
SoCar
(Refugee from NJ)
To: mwp99
Obviously Reid must not trust his ranking member on the Intel committee.
51
posted on
06/09/2005 5:34:04 PM PDT
by
TeleStraightShooter
(When Frist exercises his belated Constitutional "Byrd option", Reid will have a "Nuclear Reaction".)
To: tobyhill
Could Bush do a recess appointment during the August recess, or does it have to be in between sessions of Congress, at the end of 2006?
To: soupcon
The Dems have already delivered their part of the bargain by allowing the judicial nominations to proceed. A nuke now would seriously damage the credibility of the Pubs.
Soup,
Not the pubs- the 7 Rino's. The GOP didn't agree to anything, at least, according to Frist.
That agreement was unprecedented. I've posted before, I'm unaware of any previous instance where a "Treaty" was entered into by a small group of Senators to stymie the will of the Senate. This agreement should be undercut as soon as feasible.
53
posted on
06/09/2005 5:35:12 PM PDT
by
sirthomasthemore
(I go to my execution as the King's humble servant, but God's first!)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
I prefer my tagline
;^>
54
posted on
06/09/2005 5:35:17 PM PDT
by
TeleStraightShooter
(When Frist exercises his belated Constitutional "Byrd option", Reid will have a "Nuclear Reaction".)
To: llevrok
Given the tendency of Senators to blab sensitive national secrets on cable news channels, the President is well-justified in withholding the info.
55
posted on
06/09/2005 5:36:14 PM PDT
by
Thane_Banquo
("Armed with what? Spitballs?")
To: CDB
Just in case we need a US rep to vote for us on the UN SC, can the charge d'affairs (#2--acting ambassador) vote? I do not know for sure, but I assume there is an acting ambassador with voting powers there. Leave him in until he does something disagreeable. At that point recess appoint Bolton or someone "worse." I'm thinking Richard Perle.
56
posted on
06/09/2005 5:37:15 PM PDT
by
SoCar
(Refugee from NJ)
To: llevrok
Senate Democrats will not allow a vote on President Bush's choice for U.N. ambassador unless the White House hands over records of communications intercepts Bolton sought from the secretive National Security Agency, Minority Leader Harry Reid said Thursday...."so we can turn it over to the enemy, 'cause it's not fair, we're bigger than them."
57
posted on
06/09/2005 5:38:36 PM PDT
by
JimRed
("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?")
To: llevrok
Harry......its not your call!....you lying POS!
IF you got the documents you're asking for, you'd lie about their content, to suit your agenda.
58
posted on
06/09/2005 5:39:03 PM PDT
by
G Larry
(Promote Conservative Judges NOW! YOU BUNCH OF COWARDS!!!)
To: Perdogg
The House GOP should say "No Bolton No UN money". Now there is a true nuclear option -- along with cutbacks in blue states in Federal Spending.
59
posted on
06/09/2005 5:42:07 PM PDT
by
topher
(One Nation under God)
To: colorado tanker
"The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session."
It sounds like August and Bolton would remain in the position until 06
60
posted on
06/09/2005 5:43:41 PM PDT
by
tobyhill
(The war on terrorism is not for the weak!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 281-296 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson