Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reid: No docs, no Bolton
CNN ^ | 6/9/05

Posted on 06/09/2005 4:59:36 PM PDT by llevrok

Senate Democrats will not allow a vote on President Bush's choice for U.N. ambassador unless the White House hands over records of communications intercepts Bolton sought from the secretive National Security Agency, Minority Leader Harry Reid said Thursday.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; 2006; 2006elections; bolton; enemywithin; filibuster; mccarthywassoright; noboltonnomajority; nuclearoption; nukethemtiltheyglow; pullthetrigger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-296 next last

1 posted on 06/09/2005 4:59:36 PM PDT by llevrok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Recess appointment


2 posted on 06/09/2005 5:03:01 PM PDT by tobyhill (The war on terrorism is not for the weak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

These guys are too inept to be true. Nuke 'em, Frist.


3 posted on 06/09/2005 5:04:31 PM PDT by sirthomasthemore (I go to my execution as the King's humble servant, but God's first!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

So much for seperation of powers.


4 posted on 06/09/2005 5:04:34 PM PDT by Sthitch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sirthomasthemore

with what votes? McCain and his gang of 7 are not going to change the rules for Bolton.


5 posted on 06/09/2005 5:05:42 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
Who's the (D) on the Intel committee who has seen said requested docs and said "there's nothing here"
6 posted on 06/09/2005 5:05:57 PM PDT by TeleStraightShooter (When Frist exercises his belated Constitutional "Byrd option", Reid will have a "Nuclear Reaction".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TeleStraightShooter

Rockefeller I believe.


7 posted on 06/09/2005 5:06:38 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
Or leave it open. Bush's choice of Bolton means he intends to reform the UN. Reform or Abandon should be our message.
8 posted on 06/09/2005 5:06:48 PM PDT by Fenris6 (3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
Don't give in PRESIDENT Bush!

They have no right to these docs and Sen. Roberts and what's his name, already told you there is nothing there.

9 posted on 06/09/2005 5:07:57 PM PDT by Just A Nobody (I - L O V E - my attitude problem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

however it provides a nice jagged rock for which to interrupt Senate "comity" of which the compromised is perched upon.


10 posted on 06/09/2005 5:08:56 PM PDT by TeleStraightShooter (When Frist exercises his belated Constitutional "Byrd option", Reid will have a "Nuclear Reaction".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
Nope, nuclear option. Once done, it would also apply to judges.

Done. Over with.

11 posted on 06/09/2005 5:09:48 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Drop the bomb, Senator Frist.


12 posted on 06/09/2005 5:09:53 PM PDT by Perdogg (Cheney for President - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

The House GOP should say "No Bolton No UN money".


13 posted on 06/09/2005 5:10:40 PM PDT by Perdogg (Cheney for President - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
Recess appointment

Heck no! That'd be like giving in to these idiots.

Nuke 'em!

14 posted on 06/09/2005 5:11:21 PM PDT by Coop (In memory of a true hero - Pat Tillman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
Does Minority Leader Harry Reid want to be a dictator, some Grand Exaulted Ruler?
15 posted on 06/09/2005 5:11:32 PM PDT by Mark (Proven scientific experiment: The NY Times flushes easily down the standard toilet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
McCain and his gang of 7 are not going to change the rules for Bolton.

You have no idea what they're going to do. Wait and see just like the rest of us.

16 posted on 06/09/2005 5:12:21 PM PDT by Coop (In memory of a true hero - Pat Tillman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
Hey Reid, guess what?

You and your little party of socialist traitors can't be trusted with sensitive info. PERIOD!

17 posted on 06/09/2005 5:12:40 PM PDT by Bullish (Proudly and consistently hating the Clinton's since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
OK Dusty Reid, we will leave this UN Ambassador post vacant if you do not vote on Bolton. Who really cares?? When Bush gets around to it he can recess appoint him. You and your ilk are completely unnecessary!
18 posted on 06/09/2005 5:13:08 PM PDT by SoCar (Refugee from NJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TeleStraightShooter

Bush criticized the delay last week, telling reporters that the information Democrats want was given to Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kansas and ranking committee Democrat John Rockefeller, D-West Virginia.

But Democrats have tried to argue that lawmakers have a right to that information in order to make an informed decision on Bolton, who has been accused of threatening intelligence analysts whose conclusions did not match his.

Either this is poorly written, or the Democrats are dumber than I previously thought. They're arguing that lawmakers have a right to information which some lawmakers already have? Mind-bogglingly stupid.

19 posted on 06/09/2005 5:13:15 PM PDT by mwp99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Coop
I like the nuke option but I heard some Rinos claiming they won't go with it for the UN Post just Judicial.
20 posted on 06/09/2005 5:13:43 PM PDT by tobyhill (The war on terrorism is not for the weak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-296 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson