Skip to comments.
Reid: No docs, no Bolton
CNN ^
| 6/9/05
Posted on 06/09/2005 4:59:36 PM PDT by llevrok
Senate Democrats will not allow a vote on President Bush's choice for U.N. ambassador unless the White House hands over records of communications intercepts Bolton sought from the secretive National Security Agency, Minority Leader Harry Reid said Thursday.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; 2006; 2006elections; bolton; enemywithin; filibuster; mccarthywassoright; noboltonnomajority; nuclearoption; nukethemtiltheyglow; pullthetrigger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 281-296 next last
1
posted on
06/09/2005 4:59:36 PM PDT
by
llevrok
To: llevrok
2
posted on
06/09/2005 5:03:01 PM PDT
by
tobyhill
(The war on terrorism is not for the weak!)
To: llevrok
These guys are too inept to be true. Nuke 'em, Frist.
3
posted on
06/09/2005 5:04:31 PM PDT
by
sirthomasthemore
(I go to my execution as the King's humble servant, but God's first!)
To: tobyhill
So much for seperation of powers.
4
posted on
06/09/2005 5:04:34 PM PDT
by
Sthitch
To: sirthomasthemore
with what votes? McCain and his gang of 7 are not going to change the rules for Bolton.
5
posted on
06/09/2005 5:05:42 PM PDT
by
oceanview
To: llevrok
Who's the (D) on the Intel committee who has seen said requested docs and said "there's nothing here"
6
posted on
06/09/2005 5:05:57 PM PDT
by
TeleStraightShooter
(When Frist exercises his belated Constitutional "Byrd option", Reid will have a "Nuclear Reaction".)
To: TeleStraightShooter
7
posted on
06/09/2005 5:06:38 PM PDT
by
oceanview
To: tobyhill
Or leave it open. Bush's choice of Bolton means he intends to reform the UN. Reform or Abandon should be our message.
8
posted on
06/09/2005 5:06:48 PM PDT
by
Fenris6
(3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
To: llevrok
Don't give in PRESIDENT Bush!
They have no right to these docs and Sen. Roberts and what's his name, already told you there is nothing there.
9
posted on
06/09/2005 5:07:57 PM PDT
by
Just A Nobody
(I - L O V E - my attitude problem!)
To: oceanview
however it provides a nice jagged rock for which to interrupt Senate "comity" of which the compromised is perched upon.
10
posted on
06/09/2005 5:08:56 PM PDT
by
TeleStraightShooter
(When Frist exercises his belated Constitutional "Byrd option", Reid will have a "Nuclear Reaction".)
To: tobyhill
Nope, nuclear option. Once done, it would also apply to judges.
Done. Over with.
11
posted on
06/09/2005 5:09:48 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: llevrok
Drop the bomb, Senator Frist.
12
posted on
06/09/2005 5:09:53 PM PDT
by
Perdogg
(Cheney for President - 2008)
To: oceanview
The House GOP should say "No Bolton No UN money".
13
posted on
06/09/2005 5:10:40 PM PDT
by
Perdogg
(Cheney for President - 2008)
To: tobyhill
Recess appointment Heck no! That'd be like giving in to these idiots.
Nuke 'em!
14
posted on
06/09/2005 5:11:21 PM PDT
by
Coop
(In memory of a true hero - Pat Tillman)
To: llevrok
Does Minority Leader Harry Reid want to be a dictator, some Grand Exaulted Ruler?
15
posted on
06/09/2005 5:11:32 PM PDT
by
Mark
(Proven scientific experiment: The NY Times flushes easily down the standard toilet.)
To: oceanview
McCain and his gang of 7 are not going to change the rules for Bolton. You have no idea what they're going to do. Wait and see just like the rest of us.
16
posted on
06/09/2005 5:12:21 PM PDT
by
Coop
(In memory of a true hero - Pat Tillman)
To: llevrok
Hey Reid, guess what?
You and your little party of socialist traitors can't be trusted with sensitive info. PERIOD!
17
posted on
06/09/2005 5:12:40 PM PDT
by
Bullish
(Proudly and consistently hating the Clinton's since 1992)
To: llevrok
OK Dusty Reid, we will leave this UN Ambassador post vacant if you do not vote on Bolton. Who really cares?? When Bush gets around to it he can recess appoint him. You and your ilk are completely unnecessary!
18
posted on
06/09/2005 5:13:08 PM PDT
by
SoCar
(Refugee from NJ)
To: TeleStraightShooter
Bush criticized the delay last week, telling reporters that the information Democrats want was given to Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kansas and ranking committee Democrat John Rockefeller, D-West Virginia.
But Democrats have tried to argue that lawmakers have a right to that information in order to make an informed decision on Bolton, who has been accused of threatening intelligence analysts whose conclusions did not match his.
Either this is poorly written, or the Democrats are dumber than I previously thought. They're arguing that lawmakers have a right to information which some lawmakers already have? Mind-bogglingly stupid.
19
posted on
06/09/2005 5:13:15 PM PDT
by
mwp99
To: Coop
I like the nuke option but I heard some Rinos claiming they won't go with it for the UN Post just Judicial.
20
posted on
06/09/2005 5:13:43 PM PDT
by
tobyhill
(The war on terrorism is not for the weak!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 281-296 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson