Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Deep Throat Was Wrong; Nixon Was Not Guilty
Wanniski ^ | 6/8/2005

Posted on 06/08/2005 7:58:25 AM PDT by worldclass

I came to believe beyond any reasonable doubt that Nixon did not lie or direct a cover-up, and that if he had gone to trial in the Senate, he would have survived. Why did he then resign? Because he knew a Senate trial would take a year of the nation’s energy at a time when our economy was falling apart underneath him and we were at a point in the Cold War in which the Soviet Union seemed to be winning.

(Excerpt) Read more at wanniski.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: deepthroad; deepthroat; deepthroatdodo; nixon; wanniski; watergate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last
To: advance_copy

I agree he was an honorable man and put the country first even though it must have been extremely painful.


61 posted on 06/08/2005 1:02:32 PM PDT by earlyamerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy

Nixon did quite enough in overseeing the institution of the EPA. I've nothing to thank him for.


62 posted on 06/08/2005 1:04:33 PM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 88keys

"If one more peace-nik calls up C-Span to suggest anyone who voted for President Bush should send their sons and daughters down to the recruiter's office, I am going to scream!!! It's a VOLUNTEER army!!! No one is drafted!!! So shut up and move on to something productive!"

Well, they are right that there is now a "backdoor draft" where reservists and National Guardsmen are being held beyond what they signed up for. And the Democrats' point is that lower income people (rather than "elites") are more likely to NEED to join the military, since their economic opportunities are more limited. We need not make a straw man out of their argument. What they miss, of course -- and what precious few, not even Bush, have been willing to admit -- is that we DO need a draft. We need more troops in Iraq and we need to be prepared in case another war is needed. I don't mean to sound like Charlie Rangel or any of the other libs pushing for a draft (though the public has no idea this is a liberal initiative), but at times of national crisis, a draft has always been employed, and our nation has usually been the better for it.


63 posted on 06/08/2005 4:08:52 PM PDT by BackInBlack ("The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

"Just like all blacks BELIEVING that democrats got them the Civil Rights and Voting Rights acts. WRONG! It took LBJ going to the republicans because southern democrats (SENATOR AL GORE SENIOR INCLUDED) opposed it."

Yes, but northern Dems were the ones who really pushed for it, largely because their constituencies (minorities, labor unions, Catholic churches, etc.) were demanding it. The way I look at it is this: yes, the Dems (at least, the northern ones, whose successors are now practically the only Dems left) spearheaded those civil rights bills. But (a) Republicans did ultimately support it, and (b) that doesn't excuse the culture of dependency that the Democrats fostered in the black community. That dependency has probably done more to hurt blacks than civil rights has done to help us. Then when you factor in the Democrats' holocaust against the unborn, their inexplicable affection for spotted owls and Alaskan caribou over human workers, their misguided faith in bureaucracy to solve social problems, and all the rest, blacks should be angrier at the Dems than at the Reps.


64 posted on 06/08/2005 4:17:24 PM PDT by BackInBlack ("The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mc5cents

"[In Phillie,] The count is 70% to 30% for Kerry. I would say that is prima facie evidence of fraud and corruption."

In Chicago it was something like 79-19...and in New York it was around 84-14...If that's the number in Phillie, I'd actually be suprised because of how WELL Bush did there!


65 posted on 06/08/2005 4:19:40 PM PDT by BackInBlack ("The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
...none of it would have come to light if not for rampant unethical behavior in the White House.

I believed at the time, and still do, that Nixon could have successfully defended himself and remained in office if he had merely refused to obey the Supreme Court order to release the tapes - on the grounds that he could not and would not make the office of POTUS subservient to a supposedly co-equal branch of the government.

66 posted on 06/08/2005 4:35:21 PM PDT by badgerlandjim (Hillary Clinton is to politics as Helen Thomas is to beauty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy

"Nixon never put his own political interests over the interests of our country."

Sooo very true.


67 posted on 06/08/2005 4:39:54 PM PDT by Baraonda (Demographic is destiny. Don't hire 3rd world illegal aliens nor support businesses that hire them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
Democrats got us INTO Vietnam, Republicans got us out.

So you approve of our exit from Vietnam, basically handing it over to the Commies?

68 posted on 06/08/2005 4:49:50 PM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: razoroccam

Compare all or nothing because all who have grown government or turned their back on innocent people are wrong.

Thanks !!


69 posted on 06/08/2005 6:44:16 PM PDT by Paige ("Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." --George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: worldclass

Nixon did one wonderful thing. He ended Vietnam, the democrats war. Nixon was a good man. He got caught up in a lot of crap and rather than do what Clintoon did the man resigned. He felt the welfare of the country was more important than his personal ego.


70 posted on 06/08/2005 6:46:39 PM PDT by television is just wrong (http://hehttp://print.google.com/print/doc?articleidisblogs.blogspot.com/ (visit blogs, visit ads).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
While it may be the case (although I don't beleive it) that Nixon is not technically guilty of the one charge, none of it would have come to light if not for rampant unethical behavior in the White House.

After Nixon's resignation, Jerome Zeifman, special counsel to the House Judiciary Committee (the David Schippers of his time), stated that Nixon was not guilty of any criminal acts -- only political errors.

71 posted on 06/08/2005 7:23:03 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King

"Yes, I read the article, and I have spent hours and hours of my life reading everyone's side of the story, and listening to the tapes and/or reading the transcripts. Despite what Jude says, I beleieve that there was a lot of unethical behvaior going on in the White House, and that it is the unethical behavior that is what brought Nixon down. No unethical behavior = no Nixon being brought doen."

Unethical behavior is NOT a reason for impeachment. What crime/s did Nixon commit?


72 posted on 06/08/2005 10:19:25 PM PDT by mjaneangels@aolcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: CasearianDaoist
I tend to agree with you. The burglary was a crime and Nixon had nothing to do with it. We know that various Repub offices have been broken into. No big deal I guess.

Nixon was a great President. I believe in the end, we will find that what he did was simply "No big deal" and he resigned because he knew the Dems would put the Nation through hell.

Please remember that Hillary worked on the Nixon takedown and what she proposed to take him down was deemed both illegal and unconstitutional. So the pattern of Takedown still remains with the Dems....from the school grades of the President to the "FORGED" documents presented by Dan Rather.

73 posted on 06/09/2005 4:44:54 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I agree that there are more "patriots" (yeh, right) working with Felt and have a feeling that one of them might have just died....In other words, there wasn't just a two people agreement (Woodward and Felt)...it involved others.

I remember being at the Capitol Hotel in DC. A DC cop was talking not too nice about the FBI. He said "I'll bet they shred a million pages a day".

I have to believe that Felt has some papers someplace and his daughter found them. Wonder if she holds Power of Attorney?? That's probably a Duh!!

74 posted on 06/09/2005 4:50:59 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes

Not really. It's just a way to irritate liberals.


75 posted on 06/09/2005 6:08:22 AM PDT by RockinRight (Conservatism is common sense, liberalism is just senseless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Interesting and very thoughtful opinion.


76 posted on 06/10/2005 6:49:20 PM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson