Skip to comments.
SUPREME COURT RULING: You can arrest those using marijuana for medical purposes
Posted on 06/06/2005 7:16:18 AM PDT by Hillary's Lovely Legs
Per Fox News:
The Supreme Court has ruled Medical Marijuana as illegal.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: angrydopeheads; angrynannies; backtosniffingglue; bitterbitterdopers; bitterbitternannies; bitterbittersweets; bongbrigade; buzzkill; cluelesswoders; cruelty; doperhell; farout; fedophiles; hahahahahaha; illtoketothat; justsayno; keepgypsumlegal; libertarianlastdays; medicalmarijuana; mrleroyweeps; newdealotry; newdealots; nohightimes; pissedhippies; ruling; scalia; scotus; screwtheconstitution; statism; statistsrejoice; thebuzzisgone; timetosoberup; weeddude; whatstatesrights; wod; wodlist; wowman; youforgottheruling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680, 681-700, 701-720 ... 1,261-1,272 next last
To: beansox
then should we prosecute the bulimic and anorexic as well? Our laws prosecute dealers, not users, so you analogy is invalid.
To: derheimwill
...and the constitutional issues? What constitutional issues?
To: curiosity
... interstate commerce, states' rights, et al...
683
posted on
06/06/2005 5:13:45 PM PDT
by
derheimwill
(Love is a person, not an emotion.)
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
Shame! What part of "interstate commerce" does the Supreme Court not understand?
Oh I forgot, marijuana is used as the whipping boy for all of America's ills, from psychosis to male pattern baldness to shoplifting.
684
posted on
06/06/2005 5:13:56 PM PDT
by
rasblue
(What would Barry Goldwater do?)
To: curiosity
Our laws prosecute dealers, not users, so you analogy is invalid.
Wrong.
685
posted on
06/06/2005 5:14:06 PM PDT
by
libertarianben
(Looking for sanity and his hard to find cousin common sense)
To: -=[_Super_Secret_Agent_]=-
This is dangerous. Why have election at all?I don't recall the last election swinging on the issue of medical marijuana. And I remember that the marijuana party, aka the Libertarian Party, only got 0.32% of the vote (397,265 votes). But if I was smoking medical marijuana, I'd probably have trouble recalling what actually happened too.
686
posted on
06/06/2005 5:15:06 PM PDT
by
LenS
To: libertarianben
Okay, fine. If a user has a really really big stash for some reason, he might get thrown into prison like a dealer. But that's rare.
Mere users are rarely prosecuted, and if they are prosectuted, the most they get is a fine and/or some community service time. Big deal.
To: LenS
He/She wasn't talking about just this topic. They were saying that if the Courts keep making decisions for us then what's the point of voting for our leaders to represent us. Maybe you're on the weed if you couldn't understand the meaning of posts.
688
posted on
06/06/2005 5:18:20 PM PDT
by
libertarianben
(Looking for sanity and his hard to find cousin common sense)
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
What does George Bush mean when he says "...the freedom loving people of Iraq who yearn to be free?" and "freedom is on the march!"? He throws the "freedom" word around like a nickel but yet works hard to perpetuate the Drug War to the point of raiding homes of dying cancer patients and throwing them in jail for using marijuana to get over chemotherapy. This ruling isn't even legally sound since it throws state rights away.
Well, follow the money, if the Drug War ended tomorrow, it would economically impact the jobs of DEA drug agents, prison guards, police officers, lawyers, school physiologists, researchers at the Center for the Study of Substance Abuse at the CDC, the FDA, I'm sure I'm missing more than a few. Money would go away for the DARE grants, the pretty DARE cars, Midnight Basketball, the 3 billion a year we send to Columbia to kill Colombians, and I'm sure I'm missing a few. This money and these resources would better be directed back into our pockets, or toward the Terror War. Expending all this money by exploiting peoples weakness to "get high" and are doing harm only to themselves or a willing buyer/seller. (I'm not talking about kids.)
I guess this is compassionate conservatism, you spend like a democrat and you're mean like a republican.
689
posted on
06/06/2005 5:18:53 PM PDT
by
jackieaxe
(English speaking, tax paying, law abiding citizen.)
To: curiosity
That depends on many things.
690
posted on
06/06/2005 5:19:28 PM PDT
by
libertarianben
(Looking for sanity and his hard to find cousin common sense)
To: alisasny
"So are we going to fill the prisons with cancer patients?"If you remove the dope out of the equasion, the first step is to create as many criminals as possible....the next step is the court mandated (tax-payer provided) cancer drugs for inmates, then on to National Health Care for all prisoners and illegal immigrants. Incrementalism at its best, but where are the "States' Rights" crowd?
691
posted on
06/06/2005 5:19:39 PM PDT
by
RasterMaster
(Saddam's family were WMD's - He's behind bars & his sons are DEAD!)
To: curiosity
your wrong.
http://www.prop36.org/
Proposition 36 was passed by 61% of California voters in November 2000. This initiative allows people convicted of 1st and 2nd time nonviolent, simple drug possession to receive drug treatment instead of incarceration.
692
posted on
06/06/2005 5:20:50 PM PDT
by
beansox
Comment #693 Removed by Moderator
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
694
posted on
06/06/2005 5:21:33 PM PDT
by
Tarkin
(St. Maximilian Kolbe (1894-1941))
To: curiosity
Read your posts! You are no conservative, just a pseudo intellectual who got shunned by leftists in college. Get over it.
695
posted on
06/06/2005 5:21:38 PM PDT
by
derheimwill
(Love is a person, not an emotion.)
To: Mikse
Funny to see those on the left screaming states rights when it comes to smokin' the ganja.
696
posted on
06/06/2005 5:22:52 PM PDT
by
NavVet
(“Benedict Arnold was wounded in battle fighting for America, but no one remembers him for that.”)
To: curiosity
"Mere users are rarely prosecuted, and if they are prosectuted, the most they get is a fine and/or some community service time. Big deal."
STOP. You have no idea what you are talking about.
697
posted on
06/06/2005 5:23:27 PM PDT
by
beansox
To: NavVet
Funny to see those on the left screaming states rights when it comes to smokin' the ganja. And likewise, those from the right, taking the opposite position.
To: NavVet
I scream states rights on many things, it does no good. The left and the right really need to understand the 10th amendment, it would help.
699
posted on
06/06/2005 5:26:02 PM PDT
by
libertarianben
(Looking for sanity and his hard to find cousin common sense)
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
Scalia greaviously dissapointed me with his vote in this case...Chief Justice Thomas is the only possibility then...
700
posted on
06/06/2005 5:30:38 PM PDT
by
Tarkin
(St. Maximilian Kolbe (1894-1941))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680, 681-700, 701-720 ... 1,261-1,272 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson