Posted on 05/31/2005 6:41:03 PM PDT by El Conservador
The next time you run a scan with your anti-spyware tool, it might miss some programs. Several anti-spyware firms, including Aluria, Lavasoft, and PestPatrol, have quietly stopped detecting adware from companies like Claria and WhenU--a process called delisting. Those adware companies have been petitioning anti-spyware firms to delist their software; other companies have resorted to sending cease-and-desist letters that threaten legal action.
In most cases it's difficult for customers to determine whether their anti-spyware tool has delisted anything and, if so, which adware it skips.
"When a spyware program gets delisted, users won't be aware of its presence," says Harvard law student and spyware researcher Ben Edelman. The practice, he says, "offers spyware makers a new lease on life, letting them keep users who otherwise would have removed their software."
Degrees of Spyware
Of course, some spyware apps are worse than others. One spyware program may make severe changes to your computer's settings, while another merely displays ads.
Claria and WhenU are making the case that their adware programs don't resort to illegal tactics, such as exploiting security holes, to install themselves. And though this software can be annoying, adware developers argue that merely being listed in an anti-spyware scanner's database tarnishes a company's reputation by linking its relatively benign adware application with far more harmful and intrusive spyware programs.
According to Avi Naider of WhenU, though some other adware companies will track your Web meanderings and sell that data, WhenU's privacy policy doesn't permit it to track the search queries that users type or the Web pages that they browse.
Each anti-spyware firm uses its own set of criteria to decide whether to remove or detect a file or Registry key related to spyware. Usually even a few bad behaviors suffice to red-tag a file as spyware or adware.
Peter Mackow of PCTools, maker of the Spyware Doctor anti-spyware program, says that his company won't publish the entire list of its criteria for fear that spyware companies will use the information to design a spyware application that skirts every rule. That is a position shared by many others who fight spyware.
"The spyware guys want a really rigid set of rules defining spyware so they can then make an end run around [all of them]," says Eric L. Howes, who tracks the spyware business for Spywarewarrior.com and consults for anti-spyware software companies.
Experts recommend that you employ two--or even three--anti-spyware tools. The more you use, the likelier they are to counter the individual biases of each anti-spyware company.
To Delist or Not
It's unfair to permanently blacklist a company based on its past behavior, so some delisting is inevitable. But delisting an adware application is a dangerous proposition for anti-spyware developers. In the past, some spyware and adware makers have changed their software enough to get delisted only to resume the activity that got them flagged in the first place.
As a result, the anti-spyware industry has developed a thick skin. Delisting is rare because, Edelman says, anti-spyware firms "stand up to strongly worded demand letters."
Adware companies also decry the word spyware itself as inherently negative, so some anti-spyware firms have tried to create terms that mean essentially the same thing, using more-neutral language: grayware, potentially unwanted programs, or potentially unwanted software. But Webroot's CEO David Moll argues that matters could get more confusing if the anti-spyware companies try to refer to spyware by other names, just when many people are beginning to understand what spyware can do.
It may be until MS got thru modifying it for their own use.
Spybot fixed the "5 registry keys found" error many months ago.
Look up Spyware Tools at www.majorgeeks.com site, and you will see a listing for spybot-tx update.
Or just jump to Spybot 14r2 and have all of the updates.
For some reason, I couldn't get the MS Beta to load on my new Compaq. I then loaded Spybot, which totally blew me out of the water. I must include that I already had Norton AV, and Internet security. And Spy subtract. But Spybot did repair it's errors, and I seem to be no worse off. I then De-Installed Spybot. I was running that program on my previous computer, with no problems.
sometimes inadvertent typos make surfing the web an interesting exercise in avoiding spewing one's Coffee all over one's key board and monitor.
Did that "restore dick" come with instructions???
Browser Wars, take two various FR links | 12-22-04 | The Heavy Equipment Guy http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1306815/posts ...and let your compiler of links drop out of Lurk & Link mode for comment and advice: Ditch IE. Honest to God, almost anything else will give you fewer problems. Try and compare- use IE, then run Ad-Aware and Spybot Search & Destroy... then try another browser and repeat. You will be stunned at the garbage IE attracts. Keep your OS updated & patched. Run a hardware firewall-- with today's LAN's, it's easy. You need a hardware firewall. |
Yep, you need more than one to catch all the garbage out there. FWIW, these two online scanners also look for spyware:
Panda Online Scan
Trend Micro Online Scan
Use cleanpar (Google it and should be able to find and download it) and wipe that sucker clean. Then......do a fresh install of XP. Been there, done that.......often.
.
Thanks that's great info, I never knew it was a fault in Spybot. Any info on whether the extremely slow starting up of my pc when I turn it on is due to having installed Norton Anti-virus? The problem started around the same time.
It is possible that NAV and McAfee security suites are to blame for a slow starting PC, but it is usually due to multiple problems beside one program.
Use Spybot, Advanced Mode, Tools, System Startup and see what is being fired off when your system starts. You haven't lived until MS starts downloading updates, your antivirus has a major update, Adobe tries to auto-download and another half dozen programs try immediate checks for updates, while your virus/spyware scanner checks everything for validity. I turn off auto-updates on all of my systems, but I will occasionally keep the Windows updates on for a difficult client.
When I was a certified "Internet security specialist" we felt that Sophos AV was the best AV for corporations. Now I use mostly AVG Free, since it's memory footprint and network usage is small. Being free, I can give it to all of my home customers without violating license agreements.
Goody gumdrops - you can cut and paste! Nice text wall! How about some hard returns or other basic formatting? If Weatherbug is so terrific as you claim - why not ask some of your crack programming staff for some help in posting?
Why are you and your company so paranoid about WeatherBug's image? Could it be a guilty conscience? Is it possible that the technical support nightmares, system slowdowns and generally unclean uninstall routine(s) have something to do with it, along with your annoying unrequested browser launches when the uninstall is run? What about the cloying, 'Weatherbug is great, why are you removing it?' BS? Does Microsoft, Lotus/IBM, Adobe et al ask for this information? Is it any of their business or yours?
Many of us have done the Google research on you, your company and have seen your photo and many of your (no longer) private e-mails. We know your methods and your cynical, clock-punching view of your job and duties. You may think you're fighting the good fight, but the informed among us will never be fooled. Guess what? We don't have to rely on rumors, lies, or innuendo. We have seen the aftermath of cute, little, good ol' WeatherBug on too many systems and it's not pretty.
Being a good company man and infesting as many web forums as you can find with your holier-than-thou BS means absolutely nothing. It's like Colonel Sanders saying KFC is good - completely meaningless and without credibility. Mentioning AOL et al hardly elevates you to a place among the angels - AIM has its own problems, as do many other shareware/freeware titles. However, their relatively clean troubleshooting and removal procedures further expose WeatherBug as the worst of a bad lot.
Whining and/or bullying the spyware scanner companies into leaving WeatherBug off their respective blacklists is a fool's errand. These companies fear lawsuits and other harrassment from entities who will no doubt claim 'damages' from being blacklisted. At the end of the day, it's of little consequence to them who's listed and who's not, and they certainly won't risk financial exposure when they can omit one mouse that roars.
Since you're so altruistically committed to the free flow of accurate information, how about we follow you around the net and inform users how to combat WeatherBug's ads with host file and firewall settings? After all, your main concern is helping schools and the military find out about the weather, right?
Please post links or information that confirm your ownership and operation of weather stations - numbers, locations, equipment lists, etc. It's hard to imagine the untold millions that the US and world governments have spent on weather data collection in the last 100-200 years - would you have us believe that an ADWARE COMPANY has expended the same amount of money in just a few short years? Even the Weather Channel relies on observations from NOAA et al - it would be a waste of money to build 100% redundant facilities. Did you personally help set up the anemometers and hygrometers? It would make a cat laugh.
By the way, you're identifying/responding to the wrong poster and your attempt at invoking a humorous stereotype is as factually incorrect as your FUD, name-dropping, 'awards' and statistics are meaningless.
Thanks for taking the bait and stopping by to join Freep to post your boilerplate, but my customers, associates and friends have already concluded that WeatherBug is to be avoided at all costs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.