Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mainstream News Media vs. America
Front Page Magazine ^ | 05/31/05 | Cinnamon Stillwell

Posted on 05/31/2005 11:03:55 AM PDT by smoothsailing

Mainstream News Media vs. America

By Cinnamon Stillwell

FrontPageMagazine.com | May 31, 2005

It's become increasingly clear in recent weeks that a second front has opened in the War on Terror. Now,  not only is the United States battling Islamic terrorism and its state supporters, it's facing another enemy. That enemy is the mainstream news media that is aided by its allies among so-called international human rights organizations, the anti-American left, and detractors within our own military, government and intelligence services who are leaking as much dirt as they can muster. The mainstream news media is doing all it can to defeat the United States abroad.

The mainstream news media for the most part has long had it out for President Bush as well as being transparently opposed to the war in Iraq. But beginning with the Abu Ghraib story, it started focusing almost solely on the U.S. military.  The obsession with Abu Ghraib began a narrative in which U.S. soldiers were always the bad guys and the terrorists they fought just innocent victims of American "oppression" or even "imperialism."

This was familiar territory for the news media that led the charge against U.S. soldiers in Vietnam and, along with the anti-war movement, managed to stain Vietnam veterans' honor for generations.  ABC White House correspondent Terry Moran even admitted to the news media's Vietnam Syndrome during a radio interview last month.  While the news media held off for a bit after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, it didn't take long for them to return to form.  And today we find ourselves back in "babykiller" territory, only this time it's all about the poor, abused terrorists in prison at Guantanamo Bay.

It was there that the mainstream news media's latest campaign against the U.S. military has centered.  It all began with a Newsweek story (tipped off by an unnamed government official) of alleged "Koran abuse" at the hands of guards at Gitmo.  An allegation was made that guards had flushed a Koran down the toilet in front of a prisoner, something that defies the laws of physics, if not common sense.  But it was soon disclosed that the story was false.  Still, fellow members of the media continued to make excuses for the Newsweek gaffe and began pushing a shameful "fake yet accurate" narrative that persists to this day.

It wasn't enough that the bogus Newsweek story helped spark riots across the Muslim world leading to 16 deaths and over 100 wounded, or that it gave the terrorists a major victory in the propaganda war, or that it was eventually retracted.  America's new enemy just couldn't let the "prisoner abuse" story go.  So they pressed on with their offensive.

A week later Newsweek and other media outlets again insisted that "Koran abuse" had occurred at Guantanamo Bay, this time according to leaked FBI e-mails.  This retread of the original story was based mostly on the claims of terrorist inmates, making it almost as reliable as the original falsehood.  Apparently, none of the reporters involved bothered to read the al-Qaeda manual, which instructs terrorists to claim torture or desecration of the Koran no matter what.  Either unable or unwilling to comprehend the strategies employed by America's enemies, the mainstream media is now openly doing the bidding of Islamic terrorists.

The next attack came from Amnesty International that used the news media to compare U.S. treatment of prisoners at Gitmo to the Soviet Union's gulag system, which killed tens of millions of people.  Amnesty's report called Gitmo "the gulag of our time."  They must have missed the concentration camps in North Korea where people are being gassed to death as in Auschwitz. Or the slaughter of black Christians by Muslims in Sudan, or the hundreds of dissidents rotting in Cuban prisons.  Then there's the ongoing destruction of Zimbabwe at the hands of the mad dictator Mugabe.  But according to Amnesty International, the United States is worse than all of them.

One argument is that the United States should confer Geneva Conventions rights on the prisoners at Gitmo.  But this would be folly at its worst.  These terrorists claim no nationality nor do they wear the uniform of any military.  They are only loyal to the jihadist cause.  In fact, their tactics involve manipulating the West's adherence to the Geneva Conventions.  So while our Army tries to tiptoe around the sites protected by the Conventions - mosques, hospitals and schools - the terrorists have no such scruples.

They routinely hole up in mosques and have no compunction about blowing them up either. They use ambulances as moving bomb receptacles and hospitals to house ammunition.  They store suicide bomber's vests in schools and take school children hostage.  They attack civilian targets as a rule and engage in torture, beheadings and the mutilation of hostages.  And, according to the defenders of terrorism, the West should handle this savagery with kid gloves.

When it comes to allegations of torture, the media and its allies just can't seem to make up their minds.  The media flips out at any hint of physical torture, but when the military utilizes psychological methods to unsettle prisoners, it turns out they're against that too.  Claims that guards at Gitmo used female interrogators to get information out of terrorists and thereby capitalize on Muslim hang-ups about sex were met with shock by the media.  This sudden prudery was ridiculously overwrought.  Isn't knowing your enemy and using his weaknesses against him what psychological warfare is all about.

The terrorists certainly know how to capitalize on the naivete of the mainstream news media, as  well.  All one has to do is to read passages of the Koran to see that adherents are instructed to use any means necessary to deceive the "disbelievers" or non-Muslims.  The practice even has a name - it's known as "al-Takeyya."  Chilling tales have been told by former Muslims about the cold-blooded lies told to "infidels" in the name of spreading Islam.  Whether it be Palestinian terrorists battling Israel or al-Qaeda terrorists attacking the United States, all use deception to defeat their enemies. 

None of this information is hidden from the public.  In fact, it's available all over the Internet and particularly at the website for the Middle East Media Research Institute. Memri.org is the place to find translated and archived print and television media from the Muslim world.  One would think that the erstwhile reporters of the mainstream news media would have access to all this information.  To continue claiming ignorance while the terrorists themselves brag about lying on a routine basis demonstrates either a willful blindness or an outright hostility towards one's own country.  I'm betting it's the latter.

In the end, it turns out that many of the alleged incidents at Gitmo involving "Koran abuse" were actually non-events, such as a Koran being accidentally knocked on the floor or, worst of all, touched by a non-Muslim (horrors!). In one case, a detainee himself ripped up pages of a Koran and stuffed them in the toilet, presumably to stir up the other inmates.  Of course, what's lost among all the hoopla is the fact that the inmates only have Korans because the U.S. military furnished them with them.   But none of this matters to anti-American Muslims who continue to protest "desecration" even as we speak. 

Even if the trumped up "Koran in the toilet" story was true, would that really constitute torture?  And if we're talking about the desecration of holy books, how did the mainstream media manage to overlook Saudi Arabia, where bibles are shredded on a routine basis?

Incidentally, they don't allow Judaism or Christianity to be practiced in that country either.  Coming from the staunch secularists in the news media who shriek in horror at any expression of Christianity in America, this sudden concern for religious symbols seems just a tad hypocritical.

The media wouldn't be able to put forward these stories without their informants.  What about members of the military who keep leaking supposedly classified information to the media?  What about government officials who mysteriously disclose America's secrets to the media and by extension, its enemies?  The fact that U.S. intelligence services seem to be in on the assault is not reassuring.  These all constitute treasonous activities and every effort should be made to track down and punish the perpetrators. 

Even when the leak is done with good intentions, as in the photos of Saddam in his skivvies, the end result is the same.  Since America seems to have so little control over such information, it does not bode well for success in the War on Terror.  We face a nihilistic enemy that seeks to use weapons of mass destruction against us and we can ill afford such leniency.

No one is suggesting censorship, but how about some wartime security standards?  Remember the WWII phrase "Loose lips sink ships"?  It seems impossibly quaint by today's standards, but there's no doubt that such precautions helped America and the allies win the war against fascism.  Just imagine what this war would be like if we had the news media on our side.  Short of that, providing aid and comfort to the enemy should at least be considered unacceptable.  The news media may be eager to embrace dhimmitude, being second class citizens to Muslims, but the rest of us don't have to facilitate such a surrender.

No longer can the War on Terrorism simply involve soldiers fighting on the battlefield or for the liberation of millions of Muslims from a tyrannical dictator.

If we don't start paying attention to the enemy within, it could very well take us all down. 


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 05/31/2005 11:03:55 AM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
Thanks for the great post.

David Horowitz is live guest hosting for Dennis Prager at the moment discussing the contribution of the NYT to the cause of our enemies.

Yes, why isn't the MSM hot on the trail of terrorists rather than on America, GWB and the American military?

I believe it comes down to the simplicity of laziness, elitism and stupidity.
2 posted on 05/31/2005 11:11:59 AM PDT by HonestConservative (Bless our Servicemen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Declare war so we can deal with these traitors appropriately.


3 posted on 05/31/2005 11:14:02 AM PDT by Lexington Green (Adapt - Improvise - Overcome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
"....the naivete of the mainstream news media..." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ There is NO naivete here at all. Only outright treason.
4 posted on 05/31/2005 11:26:23 AM PDT by Roccus (Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

The naive and ignorant media takes liberty lightly. Let them make their case for freedom of speech under Islamic rule or under other state-run media outlets. If the left-wing media continues waging its arrogant, anti-American war, the voice that they assume it is their right to have will be stifled forever.


5 posted on 05/31/2005 11:34:17 AM PDT by sageb1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
If we don't start paying attention to the enemy within, it could very well take us all down.

Someone must be lurking at FR. We've been saying the same thing.

6 posted on 05/31/2005 11:39:04 AM PDT by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pbrown


It seems Bush may be...he made the statment that Amnesty International is nothing but an orginaztion of people that hate America.


7 posted on 05/31/2005 11:40:58 AM PDT by in hoc signo vinces ("Soylent green is people!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
The terrorists certainly know how to capitalize on the naivete of the mainstream news media, as well. All one has to do is to read passages of the Koran to see that adherents are instructed to use any means necessary to deceive the "disbelievers" or non-Muslims. The practice even has a name - it's known as "al-Takeyya." Chilling tales have been told by former Muslims about the cold-blooded lies told to "infidels" in the name of spreading Islam. Whether it be Palestinian terrorists battling Israel or al-Qaeda terrorists attacking the United States, all use deception to defeat their enemies.

Sounds like the real source of all the accusations of ethnic cleansing and genocide we used to read about Serbs practicing against the poor, beleaguered slammites in Bosnia and Kosovo. Remember the stories about "rape factories" and slammite women moving on conveyer belts past rape stations and what not?

8 posted on 05/31/2005 11:44:51 AM PDT by tahotdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: in hoc signo vinces
It seems Bush may be...he made the statment that Amnesty International is nothing but an orginaztion of people that hate America.

And he hit the nail on the head. Their hatred for America could not be any clearer.

9 posted on 05/31/2005 11:46:21 AM PDT by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: in hoc signo vinces

It is true that AI is full of people that hate America, but Bush's quote today was that the Koran-flushing claims were made by the terrorists, who hate America.


10 posted on 05/31/2005 12:04:28 PM PDT by jiggyboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

The MSM tries to report the "story" but ends up being the "story." It is shocking/refreshing enough that a growing majority of Americans no longer view the MSM as neutral arbiters of information. Is is even more shocking that increasingly the MSM is viewed as an enemy of America.


11 posted on 05/31/2005 12:21:14 PM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Things have really heated up here in Canada to the point that I won't watch television news because my blood pressure can't take it, and I'm not willing to buy a new TV every week after having chucked a brick through it.

You think your MSM is bad, you should hear the bile that pours out of our living room sets every night.


12 posted on 05/31/2005 12:23:54 PM PDT by Ashamed Canadian (America - please invade us now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ashamed Canadian

To add, it's because your leftist cousins have hooked up with our leftist cousins. Canada is very influenced by America, more than you know, and the disease that has infiltrated America's media has spilled over the border in the last 40 years, with programs like M*A*S*H and all that other leftist claptrap. The leftists have been on the march for a long time and now we are reaping the sick rewards. All those movie makers like Oliver Stone and the like....


13 posted on 05/31/2005 12:26:58 PM PDT by Ashamed Canadian (America - please invade us now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson
Is is even more shocking that increasingly the MSM is viewed as an enemy of America.

That's my favorite part. Americans are waking up to the fact that our media is against us and for the left in this country. They are trying to pull another Vietnam media tirade, and they're getting busted left and right for it now.

News to the MSM...this ain't the 60's.

14 posted on 05/31/2005 12:28:16 PM PDT by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing; Landru; bert
Wowsers; another direct hit!

I see a graphic coming....the attack sub "Internet" delivering broadsides to the garbage scow "MSM". heh,heh

How long can the MSM continue to take on water? Film at 11!

FGS

15 posted on 05/31/2005 12:46:00 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HonestConservative
I'll buy laziness and elitism, but not stupidity.

The MSM knows exactly what it is doing. It is calculated and deliberate.

16 posted on 05/31/2005 2:44:55 PM PDT by smoothsailing (Qui Nhon Turtle Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy
Bush also said AI was relying on claims made by released prisoners and he said AIs charges were absurd.
17 posted on 05/31/2005 3:17:46 PM PDT by smoothsailing (Qui Nhon Turtle Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Did anyone watch the media and the Free press presentation on CSpan 5/24/05 ?(just rebroadcasted). John Conyers held a meeting with the likes of Al Franken, David Brooks, Randi Rhodes, etc. (I was so amazed to think they know what we're thinking. As if the Downing Street memo is some kind of smoking gun. Those who pay attention know Iraq's been on the radar screen since Feb 1998).
Folks, watch out for the "Fairness Doctrine" to reappear.
Anyway, I digress... Articles like this and "Sanctuary" on www.ejectejecteject.com need to be publicized to let our military know we are aware of what they face.


18 posted on 05/31/2005 3:25:13 PM PDT by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake

I would argue we should sharpen up our aim and the graphic might be persons. The media is a shotgun blast. Shultzberger and other individuals should become the targets.

These individuals are the worst enemies of America. They cause more real harm than North Korea or France or even maybe Iran. Kimjungill is a wannabe compared to Mr Shultzberger and the ability to do real harm.

Thomas Curley of the AP is also a super bad guy. not to be neglected is Richard M. Smith, editor in chief of Newsweek.


19 posted on 05/31/2005 5:26:22 PM PDT by bert (Rename Times Square......... Rudy Square. Just in.... rename the Washington Post March??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bert
Shultzberger and other individuals should become the targets.

Uh huh! You know what bert; I've given some thought to what it would take to tear down the Ministry of Truth(although they seem to be doing a pretty good job on their own). I've come to believe it's a chicken and egg thing. Who gets the pink slips first, management or employees? I would submit that neither alone would get the job done because the internal battles would pretty much lead to a status quo. That is, it would take a complete house cleaning to exorcise the cancer. Then again, the patient may be terminal ;^)

The rest of your points I agree with wholeheartedly. There is no enemy, foreign or domestic, that is more of a danger to our culture and way of life than the old media.

It's time for them to go ;^)

FGS

20 posted on 05/31/2005 6:55:37 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson