Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: smoothsailing; Landru; bert
Wowsers; another direct hit!

I see a graphic coming....the attack sub "Internet" delivering broadsides to the garbage scow "MSM". heh,heh

How long can the MSM continue to take on water? Film at 11!

FGS

15 posted on 05/31/2005 12:46:00 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ForGod'sSake

I would argue we should sharpen up our aim and the graphic might be persons. The media is a shotgun blast. Shultzberger and other individuals should become the targets.

These individuals are the worst enemies of America. They cause more real harm than North Korea or France or even maybe Iran. Kimjungill is a wannabe compared to Mr Shultzberger and the ability to do real harm.

Thomas Curley of the AP is also a super bad guy. not to be neglected is Richard M. Smith, editor in chief of Newsweek.


19 posted on 05/31/2005 5:26:22 PM PDT by bert (Rename Times Square......... Rudy Square. Just in.... rename the Washington Post March??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: ForGod'sSake
"Wowsers; another direct hit!"

HA!!
A mere *pea* against the hull of a "Missouri class" battleship, my friend.
No more, and no less.

"How long can the MSM continue to take on water?"

As long as the mega multinational corporate advertiser dollars flood-in to keep their bugger(s) afloat, I suspect.
~eh? ;^)

Of course "we" could always get *rid* of all that baloney, clean *everything* up, and get "patriotism" back where it belongs simply by getting rid of capitalism, but, "we" sure wouldn't wanna see that happen now, would we. ( /sarc + ;^) = :o) )

~snip~

"I've given some thought to what it would take to tear down the Ministry of Truth...I've come to believe it's a chicken and egg thing. Who gets the pink slips first, management or employees?"

My friend.
Wasn't it the Dutch who invented a parable for illustrating the folly of what you've suggested, above?
Finger, dike, Dutch-boy & all that? :^)

"I would submit that neither alone would get the job done because the internal battles would pretty much lead to a status quo. That is, it would take a complete house cleaning to exorcise the cancer. Then again, the patient may be terminal...There is no enemy, foreign or domestic, that is more of a danger to our culture and way of life than the old media."

Make time to sit yourself down and watch [a rented copy] of midget-mega-mouth Spike Lee's epic, Malcolm X, OK?

Wait for the scene an imprisoned, drug withdrawing Malcolm Little is approached {HINT: takes place in the prison latrine} by a NOI member who proceeds to give young Malcolm a little *advise*/*insight*.
Specifically informing Malcolm of precisely what he's [been] fighting, and, what Malcolm must do to fight back against the forces.
Forces a FOI is adamant are responsible for & behind his -- & all other oppressed minorities -- predicament.

Using the *hindsight* of my years, FGS, it seems to me if we were to all have the *kind* of "equality" -- visa vi Liberal-Socialist style -- we were destined to one day live in circa 2005?
Then this must've meant a herculean effort had to be made whereby the entire nation would become *equally* "oppressed", and, if my assessment's correct?
Then there's some damned good *advise* in [that] scene out of Malcolm X we could all use, today.
If for no other reason than to *help* us identify exactly *who* the enemy is?
Something I'd think quite crucial if we're to *fight* back; lest, we continue shooting peas against hulls?

I dare you, watch it.
Make my day. {g}

Then we'll talk.

...of dictionaries, dynasties and dictators. ;^)

21 posted on 06/01/2005 6:52:11 AM PDT by Landru (Indulgences: 2 for a buck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson