Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John McCain: The Democrats' 'Favorite Republican'?
CQ WEEKLY ^ | May 30, 2005 – Page 1478 | Craig Crawford

Posted on 05/28/2005 1:32:29 PM PDT by echoBoomer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: echoBoomer
McCain's problem is that his base support comprises the same people as Hillary Clinton's base support. And, as much as he appeals to them, they'll opt for Hillary and won't be voting in most of the Republican primaries.
21 posted on 05/28/2005 1:57:52 PM PDT by JCEccles (Andrea Dworkin--the Ward Churchill of gender politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarkin

I hear you and don't necessarily disagree, but Ted will never be able to damage the conservative cause as much as a political insider with and additional six sellouts in his pocket.


22 posted on 05/28/2005 1:58:20 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: echoBoomer
WHICH Rino will the republican primarys pick for 2008.?..
It WILL be a RINO you know.. What is a RINO.?.
A stealth democrat... Most republicans don't even know of any real republicans.. They get no press.. Few TV appearances.. and are described as extreme right wing'ers..

Hillary with Mclaim as her Veep will run against a Republican Metro-sexual.. who cares which one.. They are just cross dressing democrats anyway..

23 posted on 05/28/2005 1:59:31 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been ok'ed by me to included some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: echoBoomer
he’s standing almost alone as a nationally known leader with the instinct and skill for commanding the politically profitable middle ground.

Pure BS.

24 posted on 05/28/2005 2:00:14 PM PDT by b4its2late (It's frustrating when you know all the answers, but nobody bothers to ask you the questions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

A sobering statistic, over 8 years in office, President William Jefferson Clinton nominated 440 judges to the federal judiciary with lifetime appointments.
The average age of a Clinton appointee was 51 which means most of them will be on the bench for the next 20-25 years.


25 posted on 05/28/2005 2:00:42 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jamese777
American political historical precedent...

You may want to look into that.

...think of a Democratic President and a Democratic Senate majority...

I do not have to think about it...I lived through it for decades.

The mere presence of the filibuster option keeps for judicial appointments... IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

26 posted on 05/28/2005 2:00:55 PM PDT by Just A Nobody (I - L O V E - my attitude problem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: echoBoomer

McCain and the other 6 traitor need to get bounced from every committee they sit on.

A coach would bench a basketball player for trying to undermine his authority.

They need to be shown that actions have consequences.

They need to be shunned.


27 posted on 05/28/2005 2:01:29 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (Democrats haven't had a new idea since Karl Marx.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: echoBoomer
John McCain: The Democrats' 'Favorite Republican'?

Yes. In the same way that Petain was the Nazi's favourite Frenchman.

Perhaps those party to this "deal" should be called "Vichy Republicans" from now on.

Regards, Ivan

28 posted on 05/28/2005 2:01:39 PM PDT by MadIvan (You underestimate the power of the Dark Side - http://www.sithorder.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jamese777
Over the short term, perhaps the compromise was a loss, but over the long term, think of a Democratic President and a Democratic Senate majority and NO, repeat NO recourse for the Republican minority to stop the lifetime appointment of left wing, not liberal judges to the federal judiciary or Supreme Court. The mere presence of the filibuster option keeps judicial appointments more toward the center.

And you think that in that situation the Democratic Senate would actually hesitate more than a minute before changing the rules to invalidate judicial filibusters? If so, you're extremely naive.

29 posted on 05/28/2005 2:01:42 PM PDT by Doug Loss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: echoBoomer
Will McCain run?

I wasn't aware that he'd ever stopped.

30 posted on 05/28/2005 2:03:21 PM PDT by WestVirginiaRebel (Carnac: A siren, a baby and a liberal. Answer: Name three things that whine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: echoBoomer
McCain's mother could have written this tripe!

He is a double striped politician who is a bloviating braggart and is "looking out for number one" only!

He is repulsive and is not to be believed!

31 posted on 05/28/2005 2:04:48 PM PDT by VOYAGER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

True.


32 posted on 05/28/2005 2:05:26 PM PDT by Tarkin (St. Maximilian Kolbe (1894-1941))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: echoBoomer

The anti-Zell.


33 posted on 05/28/2005 2:05:38 PM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

'A sobering statistic, over 8 years in office, President William Jefferson Clinton nominated 440 judges to the federal judiciary with lifetime appointments.
The average age of a Clinton appointee was 51 which means most of them will be on the bench for the next 20-25 years."


oh come on.... that's purely a coincidence..../sarcasm


34 posted on 05/28/2005 2:05:44 PM PDT by Hand em their arse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles

Speaking as a moderate Republican I'd support Mccain in the primaries if I knew he had the best chance of defeating Hillary but ONLY if the this compromise results in the Democrats stopping the filibusters.

If not I'll just say to hell with it and back a conservative candidate just out of principle not matter what it means in the general election.

Mccain just better sure the Democrats don't get away with filibustering federal judicial nominees if he wants any chance - otherwise he can take a long walk on a short pier.


35 posted on 05/28/2005 2:07:18 PM PDT by Catphish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: echoBoomer

This article proves once and for all what I always suspected: Craig Crawford leans to the left an is full of shit!!


36 posted on 05/28/2005 2:09:34 PM PDT by biff0101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: echoBoomer
This cracks me up! "blah blah blah...., McCain helped forge a coalition of Republicans and Democrats to muzzle, at least momentarily, the left and right wings of both parties"

McCain didn't "forge anything". He joined 7 Democrats to thwart his own party. That doesn't take political smarts or courage.

37 posted on 05/28/2005 2:13:26 PM PDT by YaYa123 (@It Takes A Back Stabbing Egotist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jamese777
The mere presence of the filibuster option keeps judicial appointments more toward the center.

When the rolls are reversed and the Republicans try to filibuster a Socialist Democratic nominee, the Democrats will exercise the Nuclear option in a heart beat. The press would not cover it and it would not make more than a handful of newscasts or newspapers. 98 percent of the population would not even know the Democrats did it.

38 posted on 05/28/2005 2:15:00 PM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jamese777
Over the short term, perhaps the compromise was a loss, but over the long term, think of a Democratic President and a Democratic Senate majority and NO, repeat NO recourse for the Republican minority to stop the lifetime appointment of left wing, not liberal judges to the federal judiciary or Supreme Court. The mere presence of the filibuster option keeps judicial appointments more toward the center.

The Republicans will never fillibuster even the most liberal apointee to the federal bench, they never have and they never will. When Democrats controlled the Senate and Clinton was in office, his appointees had nearly a hundred percent approval rate, while W's now is below sixty percent in the same circumstances.

All we've done is create a double standard for conservative versus libers nominations to the appeals courts (which taken all together are more influential the the Supreme Court).

And, of course, if Hillary becomes president there will be a ton a vacancies for her to fill up with the most liberal jurists imaginable, which the Republicans will barely make a peep about let alone stage fillbusters.

39 posted on 05/28/2005 2:18:07 PM PDT by Catphish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: echoBoomer
"he’s standing almost alone as a nationally known leader"

Truer words were never spoken. Very few Republicans, and even fewer Democrats, would now support John McCain in a Presidential election.

40 posted on 05/28/2005 2:24:23 PM PDT by DJ Taylor (Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson