Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Girl, Dad Charged in Fatal Crash; Out-of-Control Car Killed Young Mom
Philedelphia Daily News ^ | 05/26/05 | David Gambacorta

Posted on 05/26/2005 9:09:09 AM PDT by m1-lightning

Flowers and a melancholy note from grieving family members wilted in the rain on a telephone poll at the corner of Nesper Street and Ryan Avenue in Mayfair yesterday, just a few yards from where a young mother was fatally injured last month.

Sarah McGinley, 18, was pinned by an out-of-control car on her fiance's front lawn on April 17, just seconds after she tossed her 1-year-old daughter to safety. She died from her injuries a few hours later.

Yesterday morning, the District Attorney's Office announced it was filing charges against the driver, Megan Miller, 15, and her father, Richard Miller, 46.

With her father alongside her, Megan Miller was practicing driving in the parking lot of Abraham Lincoln High School when the car crashed through a fence, sped across an intersection and soared up the lawn, hitting McGinley. Miller did not have a learner's permit or a driver's license.

The teen is charged with being involved in an accident involving death or personal injury while not being properly licensed, and will be tried in juvenile court.

Her father is being charged with involuntary manslaughter and homicide by vehicle. He could face up to 12 years in prison, said D.A. spokeswoman Cathie Aboo-kire.

Both father and daughter surrendered to the police accident-investigation division yesterday afternoon, said the family's attorney, Fortunato Perri Jr.

"It is an impossibly difficult time for them," Perri said. "They have nothing but grief for McGinley's family."

The Millers are expected to have separate preliminary hearings within the next week, Perri said.

In both cases, "I think the judge will evaluate the situation and see it's nothing more than an accident. She lost control of the vehicle and was unable to stop what happened. It's a shame," he said.

Local criminal-defense attorney A. Charles Peruto said he believes that juvenile court will be kind to Megan Miller. "The most likely outcome is that they will defer adjudication. They'll leave her in limbo until she's 18 and then wipe her record clean," Peruto said.

The reason, he said, is that as a "young, nonindependent person," she was just following her father's instructions to practice driving.

District Attorney Lynne Abraham viewed the Millers' accident different from Peruto. She cited Pennsylvania law stating that drivers must obtain learner's permits before they can possess a driver's license. "Then and only then may you get behind the wheel of a lethal vehicle and drive the car," she said.

Abraham also faulted Richard Miller for allowing his daughter to drive his 1999 Mercury Grand Marquis, even though they were in a deserted parking lot. If Miller had denied his daughter a driving lesson, "that would have prevented a young mother from dying, and a child from being orphaned for her entire life."

McGinley's daughter, Victoria Wagner, is being cared for by her fiance and his parents.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; US: Maryland; US: New Jersey; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: accident; cary; driverslicence; learnerspermit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-168 next last
To: af_vet_1981

You are truly the new face of FR.


61 posted on 05/26/2005 10:27:22 AM PDT by Nov3 ("This is the best election night in history." --DNC chair Terry McAuliffe Nov. 2,2004 8p.m.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: acad1228
Traffic laws do apply in a parking lot, and on public property. A person is responsible if you do faulty electric work and practically anything else if you do it without a license especially if it results in death.
62 posted on 05/26/2005 10:29:00 AM PDT by JIM O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JIM O
A person is responsible if you do faulty electric work and practically anything else if you do it without a license especially if it results in death.

Guess what - they're also liable if they do faulty work WITH a license.
63 posted on 05/26/2005 10:34:48 AM PDT by beezdotcom (I'm usually either right or wrong...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: JIM O
Traffic laws do apply in a parking lot, and on public property. A person is responsible if you do faulty electric work and practically anything else if you do it without a license especially if it results in death.

Only if someone is, as in this case, injured or killed. In such instannces the responsible party (i.e. the father)can be charged with endangerment or neglegent homocide for failing to control the situation. If the girl had kept the car in the lot and accidently hit an unoccupied car, her father or his insurance company would be responsible for damages, but she would have commited no crime.

64 posted on 05/26/2005 10:36:32 AM PDT by acad1228
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: beezdotcom
If so, then the lack of a permit could be shown to be irrelevant to the crime, and not a contributing factor.

That argument would lead to illegal aliens can drive without a license or insurance as long as they are old enough.

65 posted on 05/26/2005 10:36:50 AM PDT by JIM O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Deaf Smith
"With vehicles, there are no accidents; someone is always negligent."

Untrue. Driving to fast is negligence. Swerving to avoid a deer and hitting another car is an accident.

Negligence would imply lack of care or concern. If the father had no care or concern for the safety of pedestrians, then why did he choose a parking lot for the location?

66 posted on 05/26/2005 10:37:12 AM PDT by m1-lightning (God, Guns, and Country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: acad1228

Isn't the intent in this case the same? Wether or not the object that she hit was inanimate or something breathing (ie. human, dog, cat, etc.)?


67 posted on 05/26/2005 10:39:30 AM PDT by kx9088
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: kx9088
Isn't the intent in this case the same? Wether or not the object that she hit was inanimate or something breathing (ie. human, dog, cat, etc.)?

Not really. Your car, cat, dog, or pink flamingo lawn ornament are considered property. Different laws apply.

Speaking of intent, this girl's intent was to learn to drive. her father's intent was to teach. No harm was intended. She lost control of the car and he failed to retain control if the situation. He is civilly and criminally liable for this young mother's death.

68 posted on 05/26/2005 10:47:05 AM PDT by acad1228
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: m1-lightning

Ok...so to get a learner's permit, isn't a written test only required. After the permit is obtained, then you get behind the wheel. SO exactly HOW would the permit have prevented this young gal from letting the vehicle go out of control??

A horrible accident to be sure, but I think the DA is going a little overboard.


69 posted on 05/26/2005 10:47:16 AM PDT by griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

I needed a learner's permit to take driver's ed. I also attended this high school. The campus is huge, and the streets surrounding the school are wide, so that must have been one long, out-of-control, scenario.


70 posted on 05/26/2005 10:47:43 AM PDT by hollywood (Stay on topic, please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Arthalion

...including the fact that the BRAKE will STOP an out of control car

I don't think so....rules of the road are tested. Not how to apply the brakes.


71 posted on 05/26/2005 10:48:43 AM PDT by griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Nov3
You are truly the new face of FR.

You know Lynne Abraham is guilty.

We just have to find someone to file the charges.

Since she is The People's DA I figured she could do it herself ...

72 posted on 05/26/2005 10:49:07 AM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: m1-lightning

"Swerving to avoid a deer and hitting another car is an accident."

Nope it is just plain stupid and negligent. Your saying that putting more human life at risk to keep from hitting the deer is an acceptable reason to crash a car. I disagree.


73 posted on 05/26/2005 10:50:33 AM PDT by CSM ( If the government has taken your money, it has fulfilled its Social Security promises. (dufekin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Arthalion
"I feel sorry for the kid, but they should throw the book at the dad. He willingly created a potentially lethal situation, and it killed someone."

I disagree. My father put me behind the wheel in a parking lot before I got my driver's license and taught me how to drive on ice... in that situation, the brake does not stop the car and you just have to learn to feel the car to get it to stop the best that you can.

Had I lost control a struck someone then we would have been in a similar situation. However, I didn't hit anyone and because of the training my father gave me that the state doesn't give to other drivers, I have avoided many accidents in the winter, one of which could have been fatal had my wife been driving because she has little experience behind the wheel on ice.

74 posted on 05/26/2005 10:51:13 AM PDT by m1-lightning (God, Guns, and Country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: CSM

I'm telling PETA you said that. ;)


75 posted on 05/26/2005 10:52:52 AM PDT by hollywood (Stay on topic, please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: latina4dubya
" if they had followed the law, this would not have happened..."

That's right. I have never heard of a state licensed driver loosing control of a vehicle.
76 posted on 05/26/2005 10:53:06 AM PDT by griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: JIM O
If so, then the lack of a permit could be shown to be irrelevant to the crime, and not a contributing factor.

That argument would lead to illegal aliens can drive without a license or insurance as long as they are old enough.


Uh, NO.

It is still illegal to drive without a permit, and the penalty for that infraction should be applied without regard to any other activities. It is illegal to be here "illegally", and the penalty for THAT infraction should be applied without regard to any other activities.

Since the girl did not meet the permit age requirements, you could certainly argue that, since the state dictates age as a component of driver competence, the father should have known that she was not competent to drive - which is where the criminal negligence charge makes sense. My point was (became) the hypothetical situation where, if she was 100% eligible for the permit, no increase in knowledge or skills but an extra piece of paper would somehow save her and her father from further criminal liability. That makes little sense to me. The permit, as it is implemented right now (go look at the requirements), does not certify or confer additional competence, at least at any level that would have applied here. Thus, if the girl had been of age, I think the lack of the permit (while still a punishable offense) would have less bearing on the overall charge of negligence.

Let's look at the reverse. Suppose a guy who shows you his electrician's license comes and wires your house, and does a fine job. An inspector comes later and says "That guy's license was faked; you have to rip all this out and get a licensed guy to do it." You ask, "is there a problem with the wiring?" He says, "No, it's a fine job, but the license is the only thing that matters." Would THAT make sense?

It reminds me a little bit of the comedian who makes fun of the airlines warning against the seat backs having to be raised on takeoff and landing. He leans forward an inch and says "LIVE." Then he leans back an inch and says "DIE." ...forward... "LIVE." ...backward... "DIE." ...
77 posted on 05/26/2005 10:58:44 AM PDT by beezdotcom (I'm usually either right or wrong...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: m1-lightning

I was making a statement that a lot of people cannot drive, at the most they can only aim a car.


78 posted on 05/26/2005 11:00:55 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit." AYN RAND)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: acad1228

I agree that what the father did was wrong, but to put him in jail for something that he (and many other parents in the country) thought would be a simple "...lightly press on the gas pedal, drive in a few circles, ok now stop, put it in park and switch seats..." type of deal.

But what really annoys me about this situation is the way Abraham is going all pit-bull over it. There are for more pressing matters going on in the city that need her attention, this is something that should just be a citation and appearence in traffic court.


79 posted on 05/26/2005 11:01:41 AM PDT by kx9088
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: CSM; m1-lightning
Nope it is just plain stupid and negligent. Your saying that putting more human life at risk to keep from hitting the deer is an acceptable reason to crash a car. I disagree.

Think again:


..
80 posted on 05/26/2005 11:02:43 AM PDT by beezdotcom (I'm usually either right or wrong...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-168 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson