To: m1-lightning
"Swerving to avoid a deer and hitting another car is an accident."
Nope it is just plain stupid and negligent. Your saying that putting more human life at risk to keep from hitting the deer is an acceptable reason to crash a car. I disagree.
73 posted on
05/26/2005 10:50:33 AM PDT by
CSM
( If the government has taken your money, it has fulfilled its Social Security promises. (dufekin))
To: CSM
I'm telling PETA you said that. ;)
75 posted on
05/26/2005 10:52:52 AM PDT by
hollywood
(Stay on topic, please.)
To: CSM; m1-lightning
Nope it is just plain stupid and negligent. Your saying that putting more human life at risk to keep from hitting the deer is an acceptable reason to crash a car. I disagree.
Think again:
![](http://www.snopes.com/photos/small/durango3_small.jpg)
..
![](http://www.snopes.com/photos/small/durango4_small.jpg)
80 posted on
05/26/2005 11:02:43 AM PDT by
beezdotcom
(I'm usually either right or wrong...)
To: CSM
Your saying that putting more human life at risk to keep from hitting the deer is an acceptable reason to crash a car. I disagree.There is no negligence in split second reactions. Situations on the road change rapidly. Instinct has the biggest influence on your reaction. It is instict to avoid a deer. When you have to go into a thought process of deciding which way to turn to avoid the deer, then it takes too much time to do so thus it becomes an accident. Accidents are unintended. I doubt any one who swerves to miss a deer intends to hit a car instead.
84 posted on
05/26/2005 11:17:34 AM PDT by
m1-lightning
(God, Guns, and Country!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson