Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hannity radio show will have Sen. Lindsey Graham @ 1630 EST - Sen. Bill Frist scheduled for 1700 EST
Hannity Radio Show | 5/24/05 | Libloather

Posted on 05/24/2005 1:23:58 PM PDT by Libloather

Frist's first interview since the musshy middle announced their deal. As far actual news goes - Rush called Frist's office and at this point all judges will get a vote.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; 430; 500; bill; est; filibuster; frist; graham; hannity; lindsey; radio; scheduled; sen; senator; show; simperingpansygraham; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321-335 last
To: econ_grad
Again, this is the divide and conquer strategy of the Republicans that people like you fall for.

Spare me the condescension -- you're the one trying to divide Republicans ("people like you"? You don't even know me). So you hate Bush, fine. Go join some feckless third- or fourth-party so you can feel ideologically pure, politically smug, and utterly impotent. Instead of whining about how stupid everyone else is, how about proposing solutions?

321 posted on 05/24/2005 4:19:19 PM PDT by inkling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
I'm still waiting for some satellite broadcast to carry Rush.

I expect you'll have a long wait. Rush has too many affiliates (and the private side of his web site) to broadcast via satellite.

322 posted on 05/24/2005 4:35:33 PM PDT by JoeGar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: inkling

Whao, you call me names and then say I am condescending. Hmmm. I think the big problem is people cannot really handle the truth. Once you have accepted the truth, then you will see the path yourself. However, at that point others will call you condescending, utterly impotent, etc.


323 posted on 05/24/2005 4:40:31 PM PDT by econ_grad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
They all deserve consequences for the political adultery.

I guess we will have to disagree on this. I don't think Snowe, Collins and Chafee "deserve" anything near what the 4 red state Senators "deserve." And there are so many more options with the latter.

At this point I think Frist is correct. Ignore the agreement and bring up the judges over and over again until they get up or down votes.

On this we completely agree.

324 posted on 05/24/2005 4:45:07 PM PDT by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: econ_grad

"Whao" indeed. I wish you well in your path of "martyr to the one true way".


325 posted on 05/24/2005 4:46:57 PM PDT by inkling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: cody32127; JoeGar
Rush is not going to satellite because of his agreements with the radio stations he's on now. - I expect you'll have a long wait. Rush has too many affiliates (and the private side of his web site) to broadcast via satellite.

If there's loot to be made, the satellite doods will be all over it. Sirius, XM, it doesn't matter. Time for the Maha to devour the planet. THAT would boost sales. Let the bidding begin...

326 posted on 05/24/2005 4:53:26 PM PDT by Libloather (If it wernt for spellcheck, I'd have no check at all. Gloom, despair, and agony on me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: inkling

If it is true, it can only be one. I could be wrong, but everytime I think I am wrong I am proven right. Before you dismiss anything, and it doesn't have to be in politics, ask yourself this question: "What if it is right?" Would the world look any different if it is right? If you have deduced correctly, then you can judge for yourself whether or not to reject that hypothesis. So far every time I ask myself a question "Are Republicans conservative?," I am proved wrong.


327 posted on 05/24/2005 4:54:29 PM PDT by econ_grad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger


Ooooooh, whippings for them,...lol... they'd better watch out!


328 posted on 05/24/2005 5:27:07 PM PDT by onyx (Pope John Paul II - May 18, 1920 - April 2, 2005 = SANTO SUBITO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: feedback doctor

Eloquent.


329 posted on 05/24/2005 5:41:01 PM PDT by Zechariah11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: PeskyOne

Ravenel/Inglis/Sanford


330 posted on 05/24/2005 6:14:20 PM PDT by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: PeskyOne

Rats, I missed that. I was waiting to hear Graham, but had to go to my daughter's soccer game. I think I heard earlier on that show about some ppl already have asked Ravenel to run or to draft him to run. I supported him against DeMint, and I would work hard to get him elected. He seems to be a true conservative.


331 posted on 05/24/2005 6:47:40 PM PDT by Babsig (I am a Republican, always vote Republican...although I did vote for Lindsey Graham.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: econ_grad
as pbs says:
In 1978, Souter became an associate justice of the New Hampshire Superior Court, the state's trial court of general jurisdiction, which made rounds from county to county. Newly elected New Hampshire governor John Sununu appointed Souter to the New Hampshire Supreme Court in 1983. Seven years later, as President George Bush's Chief of Staff, Sununu recommended Souter for a position on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. Souter assumed that job in April 1990.

Just months later, Souter was nominated for a seat on the Supreme Court, winning Senate confirmation in October by a vote of 90 to 9. The press quickly dubbed Souter the "stealth justice," since his professional record provoked little, if any, controversy.

Now I have always heard that Sununu went "to bat" for Souter as he was "one of his guys" from New hampshire.
332 posted on 05/24/2005 7:08:08 PM PDT by KC Burke (Men of intemperate minds can never be free....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

I can't help but wonder how he's going to react.

I didn't listen but I'm gonna guess RANT RANT RANT RANT It's the end of the world,RANT RANT RANT, buy my book RANT RANT RANT, I'm the only true conservative on radio, RANT RANT RANT.


333 posted on 05/24/2005 8:28:10 PM PDT by Valin (The right to do something does not mean that doing it is right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunkport

"LOL....Susan Collins?"

Yeth...that's the one.


334 posted on 05/25/2005 4:40:21 AM PDT by Maria S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: econ_grad
That's strange. What you are saying is that everyone knew about Souter, except for Bush.

That certainly proves that "going along to get along" is not sound strategery.

Reminds me of "read my lips", then raising taxes, not smart.

I actually voted for Perot in 92, the only problem was I got Clintoon, my apology to all, LOL.

335 posted on 05/25/2005 11:04:41 AM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Minuteman at heart, couch potato in reality))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321-335 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson