Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hannity radio show will have Sen. Lindsey Graham @ 1630 EST - Sen. Bill Frist scheduled for 1700 EST
Hannity Radio Show | 5/24/05 | Libloather

Posted on 05/24/2005 1:23:58 PM PDT by Libloather

Frist's first interview since the musshy middle announced their deal. As far actual news goes - Rush called Frist's office and at this point all judges will get a vote.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; 430; 500; bill; est; filibuster; frist; graham; hannity; lindsey; radio; scheduled; sen; senator; show; simperingpansygraham; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 321-335 next last
To: mware
RIGHT and withhold funds and all perks.

Fight fire with fire and then some. It's hardball time.

201 posted on 05/24/2005 2:22:04 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: wouldntbprudent

I'm glad to seek the jackels coming out of the woodwork. This is all about the right to kill unborn babies. Period. End of story. No further analysis necessary.


202 posted on 05/24/2005 2:22:21 PM PDT by Kenny Bunkport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Prolifeconservative
I really wonder if Senator Graham's dipstick touches the bottom of his oil pan. """

Good question: Who's pan does Graham's dipstick touch? Does this sweet weakling remind you of Tinder Bell?

203 posted on 05/24/2005 2:23:42 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: don-o
I appreciated how candid Frist was with his answers. This will end up being a win for him. He said he was disappointed and is keeping his finger on the nuclear option.

Lindsay Graham had a tone to his voice that conveyed to me he was beginning to regret his sellout.

204 posted on 05/24/2005 2:23:57 PM PDT by Zechariah11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy

I'll believe it when I see it and not before.


205 posted on 05/24/2005 2:24:07 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

Dan, can you get KSFO on the drive home? I think they still run Hannity on delay from 3-6.


206 posted on 05/24/2005 2:24:59 PM PDT by Kenny Bunkport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: maggiefluffs
Graham and DeWine are currently running scared. They are smart enough to know they stepped on it. They won't be blocking anything in committee IMHO.

PS: Sorry for the crudeness but that is the best way to describe it based on the squealing, dissembling and contortions I've seen and heard from them.

207 posted on 05/24/2005 2:25:28 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy; Liz; Howlin; ALOHA RONNIE; RonDog; Mudboy Slim
Frist: "Constitutional option is still alive and on the table".

I'm STILL wondering - since the RATS think they got what they want, what's changed with the so-called deal? The Constitution? That would take an amendment...

208 posted on 05/24/2005 2:25:28 PM PDT by Libloather (If it wernt for spellcheck, I'd have no check at all. Gloom, despair, and agony on me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Zechariah11

Graham, who was on McCain's band wagon in 2000, needs to become Freeper....so he can get the straight talk here!


209 posted on 05/24/2005 2:25:32 PM PDT by smiley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunkport

thanks I'll try that.


210 posted on 05/24/2005 2:26:22 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Dolphy
Correct, except in extraordinary circumstances. This is an agreement between 14 senators. Supposedly, they will hold one another accountable. If one strays from the agreement, it becomes null and void.

The Dems are acting like the agreement is binding on everyone. People like Frist and Cronyn say this deal is non-binding for them and just represents the views of 14 senators who reached an agreement among themselves.

211 posted on 05/24/2005 2:26:23 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: baystaterebel

agreed 100%


212 posted on 05/24/2005 2:26:32 PM PDT by wrathof59 ("to the Everlasting Glory of the Infantry".........Robert A Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy
Frist calls them "rump groups"

Is that a polite way of calling them a bunch of asses?

213 posted on 05/24/2005 2:26:39 PM PDT by Kenny Bunkport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Zechariah11

"Lindsay Graham had a tone to his voice that conveyed to me he was beginning to regret his sellout."


Yeah, I remember that Clinton said that he "regretted" the whole Lewinsky matter too. And?


214 posted on 05/24/2005 2:26:47 PM PDT by Deo et Patria (Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Zechariah11
"Lindsay Graham had a tone to his voice that conveyed to me he was beginning to regret his sellout."

Too bad he forgot to put on his "Oops I Crapped My Pants" undergarment this morning.

215 posted on 05/24/2005 2:26:47 PM PDT by Miss Behave (Do androids dream of electric sheep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunkport

The Lib abortion factory is threatened any time the topic of Judges is brought up. What is frustrating is that on every issue we are being sold out. Whether it is on confirming Bolton (Voinobitch sides with Libs and the UN) or Judges (Graham joins with the Libs and the RINOs from the People's Republic of New England).


216 posted on 05/24/2005 2:26:49 PM PDT by Rosemont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
I'm STILL wondering - since the RATS think they got what they want, what's changed with the so-called deal? The Constitution? That would take an amendment...

Well, they believe the Constitution can be amended by a judge on a bench. So it's no surprise that they think 14 Senators can amend the Constitution.
217 posted on 05/24/2005 2:27:43 PM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

You're overdoing it.


218 posted on 05/24/2005 2:28:33 PM PDT by stands2reason (It's 2005, and two wrongs still don't make a right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: econ_grad
You said..."This deal has Gonzalez nomination written all over it. Bush will come up with the excuse that he is the only nominee that Harry Reid will let through. Bush will further the damage his dad has done by nominating Souter."

I find it 'interesting' that Bush is now conspicuously absent from this fight. Bush could IMO effectively undermine this moderate power broker block of senators...if he chose to....using the bully pulpit....combined with a little righteous anger. He could further hurt these senators among the party base...as if they aren't damaged goods already.

Why wont he?

Polls have consistently shown us that Bush is perceived favorably by many in his personal qualities...even among moderate democrats. He won the election with sufficient plurality to claim a mandate. If you are going to spend political capital...why not for an important fight...CONSERVATIVE judicial appointees.

Is Bush's political capital to be spent on moderates...or on conservatives?

Time will tell what the game plan is.....
219 posted on 05/24/2005 2:28:38 PM PDT by Dat Mon (will work for clever tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

You can get Hannity on XM Radio channel 124 now.

I would - if I had XM. I'm still waiting for some satellite broadcast to carry Rush. Until then, I won't commit (unless there are exceptional circumstances, of course...)

Rush is not going to satellite because of his agreements with the radio stations he's on now. I heard Rush tell a caller just that,..sorry, but xm is great.


220 posted on 05/24/2005 2:28:51 PM PDT by cody32127 (If Democrats are not evil, then evil has no meaning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 321-335 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson