Posted on 05/22/2005 6:35:45 AM PDT by Koblenz
A mathematical study of the US House of Representatives reveals clear partisanship - including stacked committees - within the House.
While this may not surprise political analysts, the objective analysis contradicts the US Code, which outlines US laws and suggests a just system in which all legislation receives a fair hearing from politicians who put the country’s interests ahead of their political party’s. The words “non-partisan” and “unbiased” appear frequently in the code.
Among the study’s findings is that the membership of the Select Committee on Homeland Security, formed after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, is closely tied to the House Rules Committee, a powerful group involved in the regulation of all committees and House members. But, contrary to expectation, the Homeland Security committee does not have many members in common with the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
The paper identifies the House Rules, Judiciary, and Homeland Security committees as being the most partisan while the Intelligence committee is one of the least partisan.
The analysis also identifies the House’s most partisan members. They include Republican representatives Tancredo, Shadegg, Ryun, and Schaffer, and Democrat representatives Schakowsky, McGovern, Solis, Pelosi, and Woolsey.
Pure mathematics
All the conclusions emerge solely from mathematical data, and not from any particular political viewpoint, according to mathematicians Mason Porter, and Peter Mucha, at the Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, US, and colleagues.
Porter’s team first constructed a model of how the House would operate if committee members were chosen on a random basis. They then compared this with the actual membership of the committees. They also created a chart showing the ties between the committees based on how many common members they had.
The researchers discovered committee member selection was not random, but instead was stacked. For example, they discovered that a bipartisan subcommittee of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence first handled homeland security, “yet none of the members of that subcommittee ended up on the Select Committee on Homeland Security”, Porter told New Scientist. “And this was despite established protocol for assigning Representatives to these things,” he added. This select committee ended up with a very partisan membership.
Connection king
James Fowler, a political scientist at the University of California, Davis, US, agrees with the findings. He recently conducted network research that concluded Senator John McCain is the most connected member of the current Congress.
Fowler told New Scientist that political analysts “have known for a long time that there is a great deal of partisanship in the House. Some voters will benefit from partisanship. For example, strong Republicans are happy the Republican majority is currently voting together to pass many Republican policies. Others will not be happy, such as the moderates who believe both parties are too extreme.”
The researchers hope similar methods will be used in future to provide additional insights into the working of the US government, and other political bodies.
Journal reference: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0500191102)
DUHH!
well gee that works in the cold world of Mathematics, but Math isnt picking the members, humans are and there will be a built in bias towards those who agree with you...
I wonder if they would have reached the same conclusions in the 60's, 70's, 80's and early 90's.
I think this perhaps should be moved to "Breaking News"
Did someone actually get a grant for this study?
Other phrases that come to mind -
- What would the House do without "experts" and "studies"?
- Dog bites man, film at 11.
- No [expletive deleted], Sherlock.
- I'm shocked, SHOCKED to find partisanship in the House.
I'm actually surprised that (a) they named more DemonRATs than Pubbies as partisan, and (b) they named Pelosi as one of the most partisan DemonRATs.
Boobus Academius strikes again.
-For example, strong Republicans are happy the Republican majority is currently voting together to pass many Republican policies.-
Oh, gosh, this piece just keeps on giving right up to the end!
Gee, and elections are biased towards the person that got the most votes, although, presently, Washington is proving to be counter to that observation.
I'll bet that he'll soon volt his party and no ampere alert will ever be issued by thankful Republicans.
And freepers will dynamo once he's gone forever.
Leni
I agree with you...
Well, now it's bad. It was pretty cool back when the Democrats did it, but now it's bad.
see what I mean :-)
My thoughts exactly. I could sit home and do this study. I sure hope it isn't a government grant that paid for this worthless piece of work.
I just thought this article would be good comic relief. I mean, these mathematicians discovered that the house was biased. That's quite the discovery, don't you think?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.