Tomorrow, these mathematicians will release a study entitled "Sun is really hot"
1 posted on
05/22/2005 6:35:45 AM PDT by
Koblenz
To: Koblenz
2 posted on
05/22/2005 6:36:40 AM PDT by
zzen01
To: Koblenz
well gee that works in the cold world of Mathematics, but Math isnt picking the members, humans are and there will be a built in bias towards those who agree with you...
To: Koblenz
I wonder if they would have reached the same conclusions in the 60's, 70's, 80's and early 90's.
5 posted on
05/22/2005 6:38:52 AM PDT by
Enterprise
(Coming soon from Newsweek: "Fallujah - we had to destroy it in order to save it.")
To: Koblenz
Did someone actually get a grant for this study?
7 posted on
05/22/2005 6:45:34 AM PDT by
nuconvert
(No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR) [there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
To: Koblenz
Tomorrow, these mathematicians will release a study entitled "Sun is really hot" Other phrases that come to mind -
- What would the House do without "experts" and "studies"?
- Dog bites man, film at 11.
- No [expletive deleted], Sherlock.
- I'm shocked, SHOCKED to find partisanship in the House.
8 posted on
05/22/2005 6:46:17 AM PDT by
steveegg
(If what I just wrote makes you sad or angry, it was probably sarcasm - thanks, Owl_Eagle)
To: Koblenz
I'm actually surprised that (a) they named more DemonRATs than Pubbies as partisan, and (b) they named Pelosi as one of the most partisan DemonRATs.
9 posted on
05/22/2005 6:49:23 AM PDT by
steveegg
(If what I just wrote makes you sad or angry, it was probably sarcasm - thanks, Owl_Eagle)
To: Koblenz
While this may not surprise political analysts, the objective analysis contradicts the US Code, which outlines US laws and suggests a just system in which all legislation receives a fair hearing from politicians who put the countrys interests ahead of their political partys. The words non-partisan and unbiased appear frequently in the code.[ephasis added]
Boobus Academius strikes again.
To: Koblenz
-For example, strong Republicans are happy the Republican majority is currently voting together to pass many Republican policies.-
Oh, gosh, this piece just keeps on giving right up to the end!
To: Koblenz
Gee, and elections are biased towards the person that got the most votes, although, presently, Washington is proving to be counter to that observation.
12 posted on
05/22/2005 7:26:20 AM PDT by
AndrewC
(Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
To: Koblenz
I'm really not shocked to read that McManiac is currently the most "connected" member in the Senate. Watts new about that? His wires get crossed so many times it toggles the mind.
I'll bet that he'll soon volt his party and no ampere alert will ever be issued by thankful Republicans.
And freepers will dynamo once he's gone forever.
Leni
13 posted on
05/22/2005 7:42:25 AM PDT by
MinuteGal
("The Marines keep coming. We are shooting, but the Marines won't stop !" (Fallujah Terrorists)
To: Koblenz
It worse than that. These guys are buying the entire false image of "moderate" hook line and sinker.
No wonder our nation keeps being pulled farther and farther towards a Euro style Nanny state.
18 posted on
05/22/2005 8:07:45 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
To: Koblenz
What a waste of an article (after how the Dems behaved when they ran the House). No offense intended, Koblenz, but this thread should be pulled. We FReepers don't need to spend our time reading this trash.
19 posted on
05/22/2005 9:37:24 AM PDT by
BobL
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson