I'll believe it when I read the report that they're ice skating in hell.
Only if Gus Hall is at the top of the ticket.
Oh, you mean that kind of red. Never mind. . . .
Rudy is too liberal and will NOT get the nomination. I don't see New York voting for someone other than a liberal Republican. Before someone brings up "Reagan" let me tell you that he only won the state due to high upstate turnout and with the support of blue collar white Catholics. Since the mid-80s, upstate has lost alot of population, while the socially conservative "Reagan Democrats" are now pushing up daisies in cemetaries out in Queens. Even the suburban areas (Nassau, Suffolk and Westchester come to mind) vote Democrat on a local and national level now.
Wait, I thought New Yord DID vote red when they voted for Hitlery? Red as in COMMUNIST red!!
Ha, ha.
but, I thought this was the dumbest part of the Fox report...
"About the same number of New York voters think Clinton’s positions on the issues are "too liberal" (30 percent) as think Giuliani’s are "too conservative""
Giuiliani/? TOO conservative???
It just shows that voters in New York are just plain stupid if they think Giuliani is conservative!
Interesting. That woudl sink The Empress or whatever sap the Dimmycraps nominate.
Of course, the best thing would be to defeat her in 2006.
Nope. Won't happen. Too many commies in the city.
If the top performing republican is still 10% behind Hitlery, I don't see New York switching columns next election.
I'd say there is about a 5% chance.... That's a little less than the likelihood that Rudi will be the GOP nominee.
I give it about the same odds as OK going for a Democrat.
They didn't mention anyone that I would vote for.
really the only way NYC goes to the GOP in 08, or even 06 is if Rudy runs and runs hard....
but it wont happen in 06 and he isnt going to get the nomination in 08 either....
NY has become more like DC than even California. The GOP shouldn't waste more than just token energy and money on it...
Hmmm...let me see...uh...no.
Vote republican, yes, if Hillary were on the ticket.
They'd pull the lever for the Devil first.
Manhattan Republican here (guess not a "real" Republican, but have not voted for a Democrat in 12 years in any election). No way this place goes Red. I depressingly noted that I was one of 16% of the Manhattan population that voted for Bush last November. Bloomberg (definitely not a real Republican) will likely lose to a Bronx Hispanic candidate in the next mayoral election, and we'll be annexed by France soon after. Au revoir!
The biggest problem will be winning any Bush states for Hillary. Don't get me wrong because any democrat is formidable with their national vote fraud machine.
The New York that went for Reagan is gone, just like California. And we lost both states for the same reason, uncontrolled third world immigration that is largely poor, votes for government handouts, and provides the margin of victory for socialist politicians.
Since 1980, the white population of New York (Broke 50-49 for Bush) dropped by over a million. The legal Hispanic population (went Kerry 3:1) increased by 75%. The black population (Kerry 10:1) increased over 25%.