Bush buries the shame of Yalta

Townhall.com ^ | May 16, 2005 | Phyllis Schlafly

[OESY]

Thank you, President George W. Bush, for correcting history and making a long overdue apology for one of President Franklin D. Roosevelt's tragic mistakes. Speaking in Latvia on May 7, Bush repudiated "the agreement at Yalta" by which powerful governments negotiated away the freedom of small nations.

Bush accurately blamed Yalta for "the captivity of millions in Central and Eastern Europe" and said it "will be remembered as one of the greatest wrongs of history." This admission has been 50 years coming, and Bush's words assure that "the legacy of Yalta was finally buried, once and for all."

It was at Yalta, a filthy Russian port on the Black Sea, where our dying president in February 1945 made a secret agreement with Winston Churchill and Joseph Stalin to surrender millions of people to Communist oppression behind what Churchill a year later labeled the Iron Curtain. No treaty was submitted to the U.S. Senate; indeed, the record of what went on at Yalta was not released until 10 years later.

The Soviets demanded, and FDR acquiesced, that the conference be held on Soviet soil (where they could plant listening devices). Churchill said, "If we had spent 10 years on research we could not have found a worse place in the world than Yalta. ... It is good for typhus and deadly lice which thrive in those parts."

FDR came home from Yalta and made a false report to Congress. Calling it "a personal report to you and to the people of the country" he asserted, "This conference concerned itself only with the European war and with the political problems of Europe, and not with the Pacific war."

Here is a list of the European AND Asian concessions he made to Stalin, which were confirmed by the Yalta documents released on March 16, 1955.

- Poland was turned over to the Soviet Union. The United States and Britain agreed to recognize Communist stooges as the new Polish government and to withdraw recognition from the legitimate anti-Communist government of Stanislaw Mikolajczyk.

- Germany was to be dismembered, its "national wealth" removed within two years, and several million Germans were to be sent to the Soviet Union to work as slave laborers. The record quotes Roosevelt as saying, "I hope Marshal Stalin would again propose a toast to the execution of 50,000 officers of the German army."

- All Russian citizens who had fled to Germany from Communism were to be forcibly returned to the Soviet Union (i.e., the gulag).

- The Soviet Union was allowed to keep control of Outer Mongolia, which the Soviets had seized from China. The southern part of Sakhalin and all the adjacent islands were given outright to the Soviets.

- The Kurile Islands were given outright to the Soviets, and Port Arthur was given to the Soviets for use as a naval base. The Soviets were given effective control of the commercial port of Dairen, the Chinese-Eastern Railroad and the South-Manchurian Railroad, using the subterfuge of assuring that the Soviet Union's "pre-eminent" interests would be "safeguarded."

- The Soviet Union was given three votes in the United Nations, while all other nations got only one.

Roosevelt's defenders have tried to claim that his concessions were necessary to bribe Stalin to enter the war against Japan. The Yalta papers prove that was false: 3 1/2 months before the Yalta meeting, Ambassador Averell Harriman had relayed to Roosevelt a "full agreement from Stalin not only to participate in the Pacific war, but to enter the war with full effort."

Russia wasn't needed in the Pacific war, and letting Russia in simply opened the way for a Communist empire in China and North Korea. This set the stage for the Korean War in the 1950s and for the son of the original North Korean Communist dictator to threaten us with nuclear weapons today.

News photos of the Yalta meeting reveal the hovering presence of the Communist spy Alger Hiss. As the chief adviser to Secretary of State Edward Stettinius, Hiss attended nearly all the Yalta meetings and could be reached on telephone No. 3, right after FDR. with No. 1 and Stettinius with No. 2.

Hiss was given all top-secret files and documents about the U.S. position 19 days before the conference. Sen. William Knowland, R-Calif., said this made FDR "like a man playing poker with a mirror at his back."

While Republicans and honest writers such as David Lawrence and John T. Flynn denounced the Yalta betrayal, the pro-Roosevelt media praised it. Time called Yalta "a great achievement," Life called it "a success," and the New York Times called it "a milestone on the road to victory and peace."

But truth finally overtakes lies and cover-ups. President Bush set the record straight when he repudiated Yalta as part of the "unjust tradition" of Munich and the Hitler-Stalin pact that carved up Europe and left millions in oppression.

[injin]

you just have to love these wonderful Democrat Presidents.....
(not!)

[NetValue]

Yalta was one of the greatest wrongs of history.

No enemy has done as much damage to America (and America's reputation) as liberal democrats.

[followerofchrist]

Wow. I cannot believe he admitted this was a mistake. The libs will call him an anti-semite now. He has earned a little respect from this independent. Now it is time for Great Britain to admit the mistake, and acknowledge that most recent wars have their roots in British colonialism after WW1.

[Brian Allen]

<< You just have to love these wonderful Democrat "presidents" .....
(not!) >>

Yep.

If, insofar as the illegality, unlawfulness, unconstitutionality of and/or downright near-treasonous sedition perpetrated by his "administration" is concerned -- there was ever a worse occupant of the oral office than Roosefelt, his name was surely Truman.

Or Kennedy.

Or Johnson.

Or Cartah.

Or Cli'ton ............

[FierceDraka]

Chipping away at the "great legacy" of FDR, one bit at a time.

About time, if you ask me.

[TexanToTheCore]

In one hundred years, the Yalta Agreement is what FDR will be remembered for.

[burlywood]

Now it is time for Great Britain to admit the mistake, and acknowledge that most recent wars have their roots in British colonialism after WW1.

We've been doing that for fifty years or more now. The word empire is still an obscenity to liberals and socialists in this country. In their company you'd get more respect and sympathy by being a paedophile than admitting to an admiration for the achievements of the British Empire.

[David Isaac]

"In one hundred years, the Yalta Agreement is what FDR will be remembered for."

I would hope it would be much sooner than 100 years. But then again, Bush has "buried" it, at a stroke.

Let us pray that he is wrong.

[gobucks]

bump..

[Preachin']

I am quite amazed to hear anyone take a jab at FDR.

President Bush has a lot of guts for apologizing to eastern Europe for Yalta. What a man.

[followerofchrist]

"We've been doing that for fifty years or more now. The word empire is still an obscenity to liberals and socialists in this country. In their company you'd get more respect and sympathy by being a pedophile than admitting to an admiration for the achievements of the British Empire."

I see the good and the bad of British Empire. In this day and age I don't think it is good to trample on national sovereignty for purposes of greed. It is true that most recent conflicts have their roots in British colonialism. I know it brought good as well. It isn't only socialists who oppose empire, it is many old school conservatives and libertarians as well. They (we) know that the seeds of future conflicts are being planted right now, though some good will come as well.

[PzGr43]

>I am quite amazed to hear anyone take a jab at FDR.
>
>President Bush has a lot of guts for apologizing to >eastern Europe for Yalta. What a man.
>

Quite so. Politically-Domestically, it was unnecessary since the electorate have never heard of the Yalta agreement.

Poltiically-Foreign-Policy, it is not an easy call. The whole 20thC in Europe is fissured with this kind of thing. And if one party starts apologizing then it could lead to reprisal apologies by another party. And then where would it end ?

He's right. But politically it was not easy to make out the costs/benefits.

[PzGr43]

>>Now it is time for Great Britain to admit the mistake,
>>and acknowledge that most recent wars have their roots
>>in British colonialism after WW1.
>>
>We've been doing that for fifty years or more now.
>The word empire is still an obscenity to liberals
>and socialists in this country. In their company
>you'd get more respect and sympathy by being a
>paedophile than admitting to an admiration for
>the achievements of the British Empire.
>

Hmmmm... I must add this to my armory of social faux-pas.

[Puff's chest] "Of course ! The Empire we most admire was the excellent British Empire, where forty-six million Britishers dominated and governed approximately 16 million square miles of the surface of the earth !!"

The anti-empire political element is composed largely of two groups: A much smaller anti-Empire intellectual whose objection is theoretical and a much larger anti-Empire left, who oppose empire since it advances the Imperialist's Military-Industrial complex.

The thing is, a lot of people in the former-empire(s) realize the benefits it brought them compared to government-by-organised-crime which they have today and see it as a better time. Liberalism/PCness is a disease of the wealthy western democracies, which can come as a shock to liberals visiting various Afrikan countries, who imagine they will meet hordes of people who hate the Imperialists and love what the liberals are 'doing' for Third-World countries.

[Coleus]

FDR sold out millions of people to the communists. Millions since have been murdered.